|
Photo posted by Roel Wijtmans in the Landscape gallery on 04/25/15 at 12:25 pm EST
Registered on 09/30/12, 116 Posts, 2257 Comments
|
|
Comment posted by Alberto Patiño on 04/25/15 at 5:14 pm EST
Registered on 12/02/14, 278 Posts, 1736 Comments
Tough call, Roel - I like both. The beautiful sky does show off better in this one, but I feel that the rocks and trees have more interest in the original one. All in all I think that I prefer the horizontal shot.
|
|
| |
|
Alberto Patiño Douce
Athens, GA, USA
Four Billion Years Website
Four Billion Years Blog
We have faith that future generations will know that here, in the middle of the twentieth century, there came a time when men of good will found a way to unite and fight to destroy the forces of ignorance and intolerance.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt, February 12, 1943
Sic transit gloria mundi |
|
|
|
|
|
Comment posted by Jean C Cajolet on 04/25/15 at 5:29 pm EST
Registered on 04/28/14, 53 Posts, 532 Comments
That's a beautiful shot but between this one and the first one, I prefer the first one for the overall balance and the colors of the landscape. Both are excellent and I think it's just a question of taste.
|
|
| |
|
Jean-Claude Cajolet
Qc, Canada
www.cajophoto.com |
|
|
|
|
|
Comment posted by gary phillips on 04/25/15 at 6:50 pm EST
Registered on 10/24/13, 185 Posts, 4136 Comments
I've gone back and forth several times and I'm pretty sure I like the horizontal the best. Not sure why, but I think it's because the expanded tree line adds an additional element and the expanded foreground tends to sweep the eye through the frame like the streaking clouds above.
|
|
|
|
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on 04/26/15 at 08:31 am EST
Registered on 11/19/03, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments
I like both and both work very well, but I like the first one better. The broader foreground of rocks and trees works better for my eye.
|
|
| |
|
"You were born an original. Don't die a copy."
- John Mason
|
|
|
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on 04/26/15 at 09:01 am EST
Registered on 01/23/11, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Roel, after spending some time comparing the two, I think I'll vote for the first view, because I'm especially attracted to all the details in the rocks. The sky and hits of color in the clouds add nicely to the story, but they don't grab my interest like the rocks.
|
|
| |
|
Mark Seaver
Burtonsville, MD & Emigrant, MT
seaverphotos.com
Weekly Challenge Moderator
Macro/Close Up Moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on 04/26/15 at 10:39 am EST
Registered on 02/01/04, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Roel, Both of these are very nice images and I can enjoy them both. For my taste I prefer the first one with less sky for the same reasons as Mark. Wonderful scene!
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
|
|
|
|
Comment posted by Monica Orchard on 04/26/15 at 6:58 pm EST
Registered on 03/04/15, 11 Posts, 73 Comments
In both images the ice capped rocks are the main subject. I like the first image because it shows more of the rocks, but the second image shows them closer and in more detail. My vote might be for a horizontal shot, but cropped a bit closer.
|
|
| |
|
Monica Orchard Ottawa, Canada |
|
|
Just living is not enough, said the butterfly. [i]One must have sunshine, freedom and a little flower.[/i] -- Hans Christian Anderson
|
|
|
Comment posted by Ryan Shain on 04/27/15 at 10:23 pm EST
Registered on 02/20/07, 226 Posts, 4571 Comments
hI Roel,
I like both of your image, but I am going to have to go with the horizontal presentation. I like it for the larger area of view of the rocks. I guess the rocks rock in the first image.
Beautiful work on both of these image again.
|
|
| |
|
Ryan Shain Joliet, IL
The universal Mind contains all knowledge. It is the ultimate potential of all things. To it, all things are possible.
Ernest Holmes |
|
|
|
|
|
Comment posted by Carey Closs on 04/29/15 at 03:29 am EST
Registered on 04/15/12, 107 Posts, 326 Comments
Ok, I'll be the lone voter for this one. The foreground seems more intimate, like I am right in the scene.
|
|
|
|
|
|