Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Dogwood #1, Great Smoky Mountains National Park
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Dogwood #1, Great Smoky Mountains National Park

by Jerry Greer

Gallery: LandscapePosted April 27, 20053,547 views22 comments
This is another photo that I took during our tour/workshop. Most of the day was overcast and rainy but just at the end of the day the sun broke through and sent beams of light down Middle Prong. I love the spotlighting effect on the dogwood tree. What do you guys think?

Canon EOS 1Ds
TS-E 45mm lens + Extender EF 1.4x II
Singh-Ray Polarizer
Manfrotto CarbonOne 441 tripod with FLM head
Captured in RAW format and processed in PS CS

Comments

22 comments
Comment posted by Bruce Prater on April 27, 2005 at 3:39 PM
Good reason not to give up hope for better light. :toast:
Registered on June 21, 2004, 154 Posts, 379 Comments
Comment posted by Prashant Khapane on April 27, 2005 at 3:44 PM
COOL! :toast:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 492 Posts, 4580 Comments
Comment posted by George Hall, Jr on April 27, 2005 at 3:46 PM
Beautiful image Jerry, the lighting is wonderful. Just right sutter speed for the running water. Well done.
Registered on July 11, 2004, 283 Posts, 2395 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Cravillion on April 27, 2005 at 3:48 PM
Utterly terrible. Wish it was mine! Nice one, Jerry.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 20 Posts, 158 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Tal on April 27, 2005 at 4:05 PM
A beautiful image, Jerry. I love those lush green scenes - so different from my usual hangouts.

Guy
Registered on November 1, 2003, 566 Posts, 15507 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Hudon on April 27, 2005 at 4:14 PM
It's sublime, Jerry.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 315 Posts, 2246 Comments
Comment posted by Michael E. Gordon on April 27, 2005 at 4:26 PM
Very pretty photograph, Jerry. The light is really great. If I could nit anything, the inclusion of fuzzy water tends to put it on the 'trite' side. The upper 70% of the image stands very strongly on its own. A 4:5 crop from the bottom up would make this a 9.5 :wink:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 90 Posts, 2482 Comments
Comment posted by Brent Stovall on April 27, 2005 at 5:15 PM
YEP it a good one! Really like the side lighting on the tree to the right.

B.
Registered on December 6, 2004, 54 Posts, 568 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Helms on April 27, 2005 at 6:10 PM
You worked this scene well,Jerry.Not many people would have gotten two comps within a few feet of one another. I set up on a pretty similiar shot,though the Dogwood did not cooperate ,and as you are aware , neither did the wind.

Love this,the light is perfect and also agree with Michael there is a strong image w/o the water.


Thanks for sharing,since I was unlucky,or was I... Find out in a few days
Registered on November 28, 2003, 37 Posts, 1005 Comments
Comment posted by Todd Caudle on April 27, 2005 at 6:30 PM
STOP IT!
Registered on November 9, 2003, 472 Posts, 3705 Comments
Comment posted by Bret Edge on April 27, 2005 at 7:38 PM
Yep, another fantastic one Jerry! Glad to see you're getting lots of use out of the 1Ds.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 711 Posts, 6363 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Schlansker on April 27, 2005 at 8:43 PM
Jerry,

Beautiful image, nice composition - everything fits in place.
Registered on November 12, 2003, 32 Posts, 394 Comments
Comment posted by Dane Glueck on April 27, 2005 at 9:19 PM
Man - your images always pop with green - love the light with this one.
Registered on November 10, 2003, 193 Posts, 1748 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Fach on April 27, 2005 at 10:03 PM
:frown: Jerry: I opted to stay close to home for the Texas wildflowers instead of going to the Smokies. I hate seeing evidence I made a wrong choice. What a lovely image. I like the inclusion of hte water and the light is wonderful. ><>
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1805 Posts, 26981 Comments
Comment posted by Jerry Greer on April 27, 2005 at 11:08 PM
Michael G,

You stated that adding the moving water pushes the image to the edge of being trite! (Trite, mean lacking the freshness that evokes attention or interest. Applies to what has been used until its possibilities of interest have been totally exhausted. Implies falling invariably into the same pattern or form.)

:confused:

I just don't see it this way. My purpose for including the moving water was to show the beauty of Tremont, Middle Prong of the Little River and the wondrous dogwoods that grow there. I think what makes this photograph an original is the light and the way that the water is portrayed. I decided to use a faster shutter speed to again add a painterly look to the water instead of the milky interpretation that is most always used. The light… well, it speaks for its self. I just hope my friend Nye had the same luck I did, he was just yards away!

Robert H.,

I’ve got more from this very spot! Want to see them?

Everyone,

Thanks for the kind words! I must say that I’m having a blast with my new system. I’m once again, in love with making pictures, much more than just enjoying the craft of photography. It was a tough decision making the switch to the 1Ds but I now see that I’m spending even more time exploring a scene, more than ever before! It’s a great feeling! My worry was that I’d fall back into the pace that I used when shooting 35mm years ago, shooting at will and hoping one would turn out. But it’s just not the case, I shoot the same as when I used the view camera but with a much much much shorter setup and move time which allows for more images per scene. Man, I love it!


Oh, hey Bill! You missed a great one! :biggrin:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 404 Posts, 1977 Comments
Comment posted by Anil Rao on April 28, 2005 at 12:23 AM
Another beauty, Jerry. I agree with you that the slightly faster shutter speed has resulted in showing off the moving water much better than the usual mushy white.

Although I seldom care about the equipment used to make the image, I am glad to hear that you hare having a great time with the new camera.

Regards.
Registered on November 15, 2003, 234 Posts, 4923 Comments
Comment posted by Randy Harrison on April 28, 2005 at 5:06 AM
It just came together here Jerry. Two rocks nicely placed in the stream, the dogwood and the unique tree. Well done.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 468 Posts, 3099 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Helms on April 28, 2005 at 8:40 AM
Of course I want to see more,Jerry! I had miserable conditions with the wind.Heck,I had to sit for over an hour and wait on the wind to give me a 10s exposure.I struggled,but as you know it's about quality not quanity. I can't wait til I get the slides back.
Registered on November 28, 2003, 37 Posts, 1005 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on April 28, 2005 at 10:44 AM
This rocks, Jerry. :toast:

Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by Toni Lankerd on May 2, 2005 at 7:30 AM
IMO.....the inclusion of the water works very well! You can do it either way...with or without. Excellent, Jerry! :cool:

Registered on January 3, 2005, 360 Posts, 4004 Comments
Comment posted by Stefano Crosio on May 2, 2005 at 7:26 PM
I love it. Excellent and evocative image. Great color and dynamic range too. Very well done.
Ciao,
Stefano
Registered on February 8, 2004, 20 Posts, 33 Comments
Comment posted by Doug Benner on May 8, 2005 at 8:11 PM
Wonderful light and composition. Congratulations.
Registered on December 8, 2003, 482 Posts, 1868 Comments