Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
The Big Picture
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

The Big Picture

by Harry Lichtman

Gallery: LandscapePosted November 18, 20174,390 views9 comments
Large Image with Expansion Button

Thought I would post the big picture of the Carrabassett River Valley image I recently posted.  This was the view that originally got my attention, minus some trees that obstructed this view from the road.  I could see the distant reflection when sunlit, and thought it warranted further exploration.  I don't generally go into much about processing, but this worked easily for me using a potentially high contrast scene that you might think would normally require a split ND filter.

This is a single exposure from a RAW, that I processed 2x for the dynamic range.  After composing, I exposed to get a little clipping of the highlights on my LCD - slightly blinking highlights.  This rendered plenty of detail in the shadows, without the need to try and recover them in Post processing.  Since the LCD image is a jpeg rendering, I knew that the RAW file would contain enough info. to pull the highlights back in.  I processed the base image using the original exposure, dialing back the exposure a little, since I didn't want the shadows to appear to light.  In the 2nd process of the RAW, I just reduce the exposure, highlights and whites a little from the original conversion, layered it under the base exposure, and used the erasure tool to paint in the brighter half of the image - essentially the left side on a diagonal left corner to right corner. I did take another image as insurance but didn't need it. Heavy bracketing seems to be a thing of the past, in most cases.

D810, 24-120mm @24, f13, ISO 64

Comments

9 comments
Comment posted by Dan Kearl on November 18, 2017 at 9:49 PM
Classic, and it does not appear to be near golden hour either.
As far as the processing, I do pretty much the same except only process once. ( I do not know what you mean by processing twice).
If I expose even a midday scene properly with just some blinkies, I recover in Camera raw, and process in PS6 using normal masking, nothing very technical.
Everything in your photo appears exposed properly and a nice traditional comp.
The sharpness looks better in this compressed web photo also, not sure if you changed anything.
It is not that big a thing anyway for web posting, I am sure most people's normal files look fine anyway.
Registered on September 2, 2013, 209 Posts, 1514 Comments
Comment posted by Harry Lichtman on November 18, 2017 at 10:06 PM
So Dan, to process the raw × 2: process the image as you normally do, save as tiff and ACR closes. Then go back and open that RAW file again, if the prior adjustment setting don't load, select previous conversion in drop down menu. Then make adjustments for highlights, shadows, what ever you don't think was adequately represented in prior raw conversion. Save this version under a new name. You can then layer them to keep the best of each conversion. If you can render highlights, shadows fine in one conversion, no need to do any of this. I often find this easier than trying to blend 2 exposures that are 1 or 1.5 stops different in exposure. Just one way of going about it.
Registered on September 17, 2010, 304 Posts, 3507 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on November 19, 2017 at 8:16 AM
Beautiful color and classic blue sky with clouds fall scene. Processing looks spot on and image looks real sweet. As they, picture postcard!
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on November 19, 2017 at 2:00 PM
Harry,

What a gorgeous location and conditions. You've captured a wonderful autumn landscape image.  The colors, including the picture perfect blue sky and clouds are beautiful.  Compositionally, the view down river gently pulls you in to the scene surrounded by beauty on both sides.  Even on the right, there is enough detail in the shadows to add to the scene.

The previous image was of course a more intimate one, but both of these are just simply fantastic fall scenes. Love 'em.

Since I've mentioned sharpening a few times and you've mentioned you're still trying to nail it down, I thought I would add my .02.  First though, I've received comments about crunchiness too, so I may not be an expert here.  But I also use TK's Web sharpening tool (the v4 panel I believe.)  You mentioned trying various opacity settings down to 75 from 100.  Well, I actually have had mine set at 50 for as long as I've been using the panel.  My horizontal images I usually set for a 1200px length.  I've found that I still have to tweak the layers after the tool runs because I think most times the image is still over sharpened. Of course every image is going to be different.  But for almost every image, I also reduce the opacity of the Sharpen #2 layer.  I don't know what is happening technically, but this layer seems to increase the finer details - too much some times, so I back this layer off some.  Of course you have to open the TK Web Sharpen group to get to that Sharpen #2 layer. Attached is a screenshot, which I'm sure I don't need to include - although there may be some that don't have Tony's action panel.
Anyway, research continues as they say....

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Harry Lichtman on November 19, 2017 at 4:22 PM
Thanks Lon - I will give that a go.  I was using TK's Basic Module that contained the Web Sharpening Action, but I think it is very similar to the ones you are referring to.  I did get his V5 modules, haven't had time to dive into those.  A little intimidating compared to my normal workflow, but maybe those web sharpening actions are a bit different.  I will try reducing the 2nd sharpening down to 50% and see how it goes.  Thanks for the screenshot.  I'm not sure why these issues seem to have popped up as of late vs. images 5 years ago.
Registered on September 17, 2010, 304 Posts, 3507 Comments
Comment posted by Preston Birdwell on November 19, 2017 at 5:04 PM
Nicely done, Harry. The light here is very challenging, and your processing paid off handily. The color is gorgous, and the composition works very well.
--P
Registered on November 1, 2003, 471 Posts, 5188 Comments
Comment posted by Dave Hutchison on November 19, 2017 at 6:43 PM
Interesting process for the post flow.  Thanks for sharing. 

My main comment is the blue in the sky seems a bit pale.  Did you use a polarizer?  Not sure if you know this adjustment but try the HSL in Lightroom, then Hue, then the little icon right under hue.  Then put the cursor on the blue sky and pull up and down and see how the blue changes.  You might be surprised.  Let us know if you try the adjustment.  I would be very interested.

Otherwise beautiful image and well composed.
Registered on November 10, 2017, 3 Posts, 22 Comments
Comment posted by Harry Lichtman on November 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM
Hi Dave - I didn't use a polarizer.  I didn't want any heavy dark - light shift in the blue sky using a wide angle lens.  Would have reduced the reflection color too.  I don't have Lightroom, so i don't see that adjustment option, though I can easily adjust the hue of the cyans and blues that make up the sky.  I guess I am a little cautious not to over darken the  blues, as the light source is coming from the upper right.
Registered on September 17, 2010, 304 Posts, 3507 Comments
Comment posted by Ry Birge on November 20, 2017 at 11:46 AM
Harry, Great job.  Super colors with just the right amount of saturation.  Composition is flawless from my point of view. Keep up the good work!
Registered on September 23, 2017, 118 Posts, 278 Comments