Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
European Starling and Repost
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

European Starling and Repost

by Allen Brooks

Gallery: AvianPosted April 19, 2016114 views8 comments
Yes, an invasive pest, but it has some nice colors and I liked the pose and background.  Taken on my first foray with the Sigma 150-600.   

Canon 7D Mark2
Sigma 150-600 C at 500 mm
1/2000 at f 7.1
ISO 640

Comments and suggestions appreciated.

Comments

8 comments
Comment posted by SandyRichardsBrown on April 20, 2016 at 3:04 AM
Nice portrait of this pretty bird, despite it's invasive status. Love the pose and the worn wood. I am impressed with what these new Sigmas can do.
Sandy
Registered on November 24, 2003, 3937 Posts, 12909 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hansen on April 20, 2016 at 12:09 PM
Allen, this looks like it would make a good "wanted" poster for this species.  Must admit though, they are a pretty bird and you have done a great job of bringing all the details out, including the blacks.  Background and perch appear a little bright, but both are very complimentary to the image.
Registered on May 5, 2011, 161 Posts, 908 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on April 20, 2016 at 12:47 PM
Although I hold this species in disdain that doesn't stop me from taking photos of them when they look good and pose for me. You've got both of those going for you here - nice plumage and excellent pose.

I agree about the brightness of the BG. Try this - select the starling, invert the selection to get everything else, and with the inverted selection active add a new adjustment layer. It doesn't matter which type as you aren't going to make any adjustments. Just set the blend mode for the new layer to Multiply and that will darken everythnig but the starling. Then pull down the intensity to about 50%.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on April 20, 2016 at 4:49 PM
I agree with Richard and endorse his approach to the over-bright background.
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on April 20, 2016 at 5:02 PM
Nice iridescence you captured well here Allen.  To my eye the whole image is a little too bright and the exposure should be reduced a bit.  It looks to me like the back is sharper than the head, if this isn't much of a crop it's probably a depth of field issue with your focus on the back and not enough depth of field to get the head tack sharp.  devil
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on April 20, 2016 at 7:02 PM
You really got some great breeding plumage here, Allen.  Looks like the light was pretty bright, but it came out well.

devil
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Allen Brooks on April 20, 2016 at 11:28 PM
Richard,

Thanks for the suggestion and directions.  I haven't tried this technique before.  I think it does look better.  The starling shows better against the darker background and there is more detail in the perch.
Registered on July 27, 2011, 262 Posts, 2597 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on April 22, 2016 at 11:27 AM
Allen:

You are welcome. I like the repost. By going a bit darker on the background it also makes the colors appear richer.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments