Wintry Vixen
by Ashleigh Scully
Hi -
A beautiful female Red Fox I photographed this winter in New Jersey.
Canon EIS 5D MIII
Canon 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM
Manual Exposure
ISO 1000 | f/6.3 | 1/800s
Minor sharpening of face/eye and some saturation adjustment. About 25% cropped off of top and bottom.
I am wondering if you find any of the branches in this shot distracting? I think a Red Fox in its winter coat should draw enough attention away from other distracting elements, but Im not sure what others think.
Thank you, Ashleigh
Comments
11 commentsThe branches in the foreground are a slight distraction, but my eye keeps looking at the sharp details of the fox's face. So, the distractions are minor and are part of what nature throws at us photographers. A good job on the processing with sharp details and softly lit, bright colors
Great image, and wonderfully processed as well.
I like the intense stare of the vixen and she does stand out nicely from the background.
Two comments on the composition:
1. You ask: "...if you find any of the branches in this shot distracting?" If I'm being honest - yes. The ones that distract me (and, in my opinion, detract from the image) are the thicker reddish foreground branches/grasses that overlap the body of the fox. I totally get how hard it would be to get a clear shot of the fox (sans any distractions) in this terrain, but (even so), they still distract me.
2. This comment is personal opinion only and offered as a bit of "food for thought" - for me the crop is on the tight side. I personally find that when working with mammals getting to the "almost filling the frame when subject is broadside" point seems initially appealing to a photographer (a bit of the "closer is better" philosophy), but when you filling this much of the frame with the subject it is incredibly hard to do anything creative with the composition (other than just "show" - or document - the animal). I think giving solid consideration to "how much of the frame should my subject fill to meet my creative goals?" question is one of the most under-appreciated aspects of wildlife photography. In this instance I'd recommend either backing off significantly OR moving in much tighter (for a true portrait, for instance). I know that this can be real tough to do when working with prime lenses, but who said it was supposed to be easy?
Anyways...just my 2 cents worth...
Cheers...
Brad
Brad, Im attaching another copy which is farther away and I think its better, showing more of the environment. I really like the darker green tree in the right top corner. Let me know if you like this one better, Ashleigh
Absolutely like the second one better - that's EXACTLY what I was getting it! And, even those this is kind of a "busy" scene, those "distracting" grasses or branches that were overlapping the body have really "faded away". And I agree with you about the darker green tree - provides a nice counter-balance to the subject. Well done.
When I'm out shooting (and not spending way too much time behind my computer!
Cheers...
Brad