Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Why?
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Why?

by Thomas Haney

Gallery: LandscapePosted April 12, 2013237 views6 comments
A 90 second exposure of fast-moving clouds above Diamond Peak in the Oregon Cascades. This particular shot was the 6th or 7th i'd taken, and I actually thought it wouldn't turn out at there were far fewer clouds moving through the frame, but it turned out far better than the others. A little brightening in post, some darkening of the Seven Sisters constellation which turned out very bright and purple, for some reason. I really love the photo, though I wish Diamond Peak was a larger part of the composition and was more illuminated by the half moon, and am interested in other opinions.

Canon 5d Mark ii, 16-35mm lens, 90 seconds at f/4, ISO 400, Gitzo Tripod

Comments

6 comments
Comment posted by Scott Fricke on April 12, 2013 at 8:17 PM
I wish there was more of the mountain as you mentioned, as it looks almost like an afterthought here. I first thought it might be better to crop it out altogether, but it gives a great scale to the scene. That's a wicked cool looking sky. Great title too...
Registered on January 19, 2007, 133 Posts, 1448 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Reid on April 12, 2013 at 8:57 PM
Very cool cloud formatio Thomas. I too would have liked more mtn. but very nice as is. Well done.
Registered on January 27, 2013, 65 Posts, 2460 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on April 12, 2013 at 9:55 PM
Not sure if I prefer this with or without the mountain. I think it works either way. Terrific sky of course.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on April 12, 2013 at 10:55 PM
Weird! :toast:
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on April 13, 2013 at 9:35 AM
A very moody and evocative night sky for sure, Thomas. My only suggestion would have been a bit more of the mointain as you already mentioned. Still, nice as is. :toast:

Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Breitkreuz on April 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM
Thomas, I'm not finding the small amount of mountain being too big an issue for me personally. The sky is everything here and the mountain just makes a nice anchor at the very bottom as it is seen here. When I first saw this image I thought it made a neat gigantic question mark in the sky with a large dot at the very base of it. Nicely seen and captured overall. :cool:
Registered on February 25, 2006, 525 Posts, 8448 Comments