Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Skeleton + Repost
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Skeleton + Repost

by Youssef Ismail

Gallery: LandscapePosted December 29, 2012542 views10 comments
Thanks for the feedback on my last image.

I made one more photo of these stark trees. This one is from what I thought was the most prominent tree in the stand. I was a little disappointed in that by the time I was set to make the photo, sunlight had creeped in and lit some of the more larger branches. I made the photo anyway, and in the end I am satisfied with the result. I processed this one similarly to the last one. Using an orton layer again to help isolate the FG branches from the chaos in the BG.

It is again a crop from a vertical frame, as what really interested me was the trunk and its outward extending branches. There was also a very brightly lit area near the top of the frame that I did not like at all.

4x5, Nikkor 300mm, f32, 1 sec, Fuji Provia 100F

Your thoughts much appreciated.

Comments

10 comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on December 29, 2012 at 3:39 PM
I like this very much, Youssef. The lit branches against the mid-tone bole and branches against the dark BG are very eye pleasing and give an indication of depth. The blue cast on the branches doesn't work for me, but others may disagree. :smile:
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Baumbach on December 29, 2012 at 4:47 PM
This is nice too, Youssef, but I don't like it as much as the previous one.

- Dan
Registered on November 1, 2003, 473 Posts, 7980 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on December 29, 2012 at 4:58 PM
Youssef,

Although I like the closer view and I think this one stands on it's own, I think I'm preferring your previous version, and especially the reworked version. Like the other post, I personally feel the blue in the bg is too much - at least if this is being presented as a straight landscape; I get blue in the shadows, but for me the bg blues are a distraction. Having said that, all is fine and good in terms of artistic license and artists choice in presentation.

What's interesting, and I think doesn't help, is that the smaller branches up front seem to have different colors. The reason is that some of the branches are stripped of their bark and so there is no blue, where as the gray or neutral parts of the branches that have bark are picking up the blue. On the surface that just makes is look like random branches are blue and others aren't. While I understand why, it just seems too much, especially with the blue so strong.

Don't mean to be so nitpicky either. I think this is one of those images where it could be processed a gazillion different ways and none of them would be right or wrong. This will make more sense when you see my rendition a bit later. ;-)

BTW, the little bits of direct light don't bother me at all.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Youssef Ismail on December 29, 2012 at 6:53 PM
Lon and Phil,

Thanks for the quick feedback. I had already reduced the blue saturation in the original post. I liked how the blue branches stood out from the rest. But I can see how they appear to be randomly chosen even though those are the underlying tones those branches just happened to pick up.

In any case, I reduced the blue saturation further as a comparison. Any additional thoughts?
Registered on November 1, 2003, 474 Posts, 5555 Comments
Comment posted by Eva McDermott on December 29, 2012 at 7:51 PM
I really like the graphics presented by the ghostly tree limbs Youssef. I think your repost hits the mark for me with the more reserved blues.
Registered on January 4, 2009, 1015 Posts, 13229 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on December 29, 2012 at 8:09 PM
Youssef,

The repost works much better for me. Just remember though, it's just one opinion and might not match your vision. But you know that.

This ones growing on me too. And since, I noticed a bright spot in the LRC, I think some sunlight catching the branch. Might clone that out if you're thinking of printing.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Bret Edge on December 30, 2012 at 12:55 AM
This is electric, Youssef. I don't mean that in the "wow the saturation levels are going to catch my retinas on fire" kind of way, though. There's something about the image that makes the tree and limbs come alive. Just a wonderfully crafted image in all regards. Congrats!
Registered on November 1, 2003, 711 Posts, 6363 Comments
Comment posted by scott lanz on December 30, 2012 at 7:13 PM
Fine, artistic image, Youssef. My only issue was the blue cast, corrected in the repost.
Registered on November 14, 2003, 840 Posts, 12902 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on December 31, 2012 at 5:22 PM
I really like this one, Youssef. There's some reality in this, but a nice dose of abstractness too. It feels like some unique light. Repost is even better. More subtle but equally effective.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on January 1, 2013 at 1:55 PM
Another excellent image with high art written all over it.
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments