Drop
by Nicolaus Wegner
Outside of my comfort zone on this one. Not sure how others will feel about this, but I like it in a way. This is a plant of some type that was growing amongst the boulders up in Cloud Peak Wilderness. It's probably pretty common stuff. No idea what it is called.
Technical: This is an 8 image depth of field blend. Taken with a wide angle lens as close as I could get in focus. 29mm, iso 100, f/16, .6 seconds on all 8 images.
Thanks for any critiques...would be curious as to how this comes across as it's not something I do much. Used to the wide open dramatic scenics.
Comments
10 commentsWayne, the hot spots are not technically hot, but they are pushing the limits of the highlights without losing the actual information. I can try to bring those back closer to the original in my next edit.
As for the stack, auto blend in photoshop did it all. It's been the first time I've managed to get that damn action to actually work like it's supposed to. But then there was little to no movement to start with as well as being made up of the same textures throughout the entire image, so that seems to have a huge impact on how the software handles the information. Learned something new about that at any rate.
Thank you both for the critiques.
This is an interesting image to me. This is as fine a stack as I've seen and it does a great job of depicting the subject textures. With regard to composition, I see two basic repeated shapes here, leaves with sharp points and leaves with rounded tips. The repetition of the two throughout the image creates interest as do the alternating grey and green gradients they create. Nice light throughout as well.
So there's an interesting pattern here at one scale in the image. However, I don't see either of those shapes at a smaller or larger scale in the image nor any complementary or strongly contrasting shape at a different scale. That would be fine if there were some other subject feature that draws the eye and acts as a focal sink using the repeating leaf motif as a supporting bg. I guess where I'm ending up, is that compositionally, to me, this is a really strong and interesting bg but without anything I can clearly identify as a subject element or pattern - my two cents worth. Even so, this is so well done in all respects that it has a lot interest.
I hope you'll post more flora images over here - really fine work as are the images in the rest of your gallery - at least for my tastes.
pat
Taking everyones' recommendations...hope this is slightly better. I realize the only way to get something better is to probably re-shoot, but thought I might try this and see how it comes across. It's a pretty quick edit and I will probably need to restart from scratch on the image to get all highlights/shadows properly processed, but any additional thoughts are appreciated. Thank you.
pat
Stan and Ram, I think my biggest issue with what you see here is me overprocessing those highlights. The was no direct or reflected sunlight, so a cpl would not have done much here. I use some pretty unorthodox methods for editing my images...sometimes I forget to pay attention to things like this until it's too late. I'll re-edit it this week with everyones' suggestions though. Thanks much for the input.