Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Curvature (+ repost)
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Curvature (+ repost)

by Bill Maile

Gallery: LandscapePosted December 5, 2010120 views12 comments
NOTE: please scroll down for the repost. thanks!

A lone, barren tree limb bends as the wind and a snow squall blow in behind it.

Thanks for any C&C, larger posted too.

Comments

12 comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on December 5, 2010 at 8:26 PM
Bill,

I like the visual look of this image with the tree in sharp focus with the rest of the image in a foggy/snowy backdrop. The visual of the moving snowflakes adds some interest as well. However, from a processing standpoint there is a very obvious halo around the tree-limb... i'd re-work the image to eliminate the halo.
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Preston Birdwell on December 5, 2010 at 11:45 PM
Bill,

I like the concept in this image.I agree with Luke regarding the halo. From a compositional standpoint, I think the depth of field is a bit too shallow. I'd lile to see more deatil in the background to lend some depth. This has potential, so go after it! :smile:

--P
Registered on November 1, 2003, 471 Posts, 5188 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Greenwood on December 5, 2010 at 11:50 PM
Hmmm ... I've come back to this one a few times, but I haven't been able to nail down a specific critique. There's nothing that I'm finding particularly disagreeable about the composition. On the other hand, although I can't put my finger on why, it’s not especially piquing my interest either.

Sorry :frown:
Registered on November 9, 2003, 229 Posts, 1523 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on December 6, 2010 at 1:00 AM
I quite like the idea and composition. However the processing is a sticking point. There's an obvious halo and it looks like the trunk lacks contrast because the blacks have been reduced.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by dean hebert on December 6, 2010 at 1:19 AM
Bill I think if you can get rid of the halo on the tree this will be a good photo. I like the in-focus tree and out of focus BG. :toast:
Registered on August 4, 2010, 70 Posts, 1132 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Maile on December 6, 2010 at 6:40 AM
Thanks everyone for your help!! Ahhh yes, I've just gotten to look at it on NPN just now, the dreaded halo. I'll rework and repost, thank you for comments. :toast:
Registered on March 2, 2009, 984 Posts, 2518 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Maile on December 6, 2010 at 9:27 AM
Here is a repost with some different processing. Hope I didn't take away too much.
Registered on March 2, 2009, 984 Posts, 2518 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Chamberlain on December 6, 2010 at 9:47 AM
The repost is a huge impovement! Not just in eliminating the halo, but also in making the whole scene more natural looking, and with better contrast and tonality. The truth is, that i didn't really like the original too much, but now my mind has changed! Good job.

It's a tricky thing with shadow recovery techniques. I think getting past the urge to create extreme shadow detail is important. I did, and sometimes still do make too much effort trying to sqeeze every possible detail out of the shadow. I have learned to not feel the need to do that nearly as much. I think for me, it robs my images of depth/dimension and natural looking contrast.


Chris
Registered on March 13, 2007, 500 Posts, 8365 Comments
Comment posted by Preston Birdwell on December 6, 2010 at 10:35 AM
The repost is a huge improvement, Bill!

--P
Registered on November 1, 2003, 471 Posts, 5188 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Maile on December 6, 2010 at 11:31 AM
Thank you Preston!! And Chris--I struggle with every post as to how much to do with my images. I know what style I want to convey, yet struggle with going overboard or as I'm told, doing too little in processing--it seems I can't win either way. I like what you say here: "think for me, it robs my images of depth/dimension and natural looking contrast." That's all I'm trying to do, in my heart anyway.
Registered on March 2, 2009, 984 Posts, 2518 Comments
Comment posted by dean hebert on December 7, 2010 at 6:52 PM
Bill, the repost is defintely more realistic and natural(whatever that's worth). Most of the haloing is gone and the colour-cast seems better. I use processing to enhance(i hope) the emotional impact of the moment that I experienced, to better convey it to the viewer. It always seems to be a constant struggle :smile:
Registered on August 4, 2010, 70 Posts, 1132 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on December 7, 2010 at 9:49 PM
I would concur with the others, the repost works for me much better. Makes me cold just looking at it. :biggrin:
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments