Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Beneath the Waves
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Beneath the Waves

by Michael Anderson

Gallery: LandscapePosted November 26, 20101,340 views50 comments
Tsoi Lik Island, Papua New Guinea.

A lone starfish shines in the late afternoon light of Tsoi Lik Lagoon, Papua New Guinea. The Tsoi Islands are a secret South Pacific paradise with spectacular white sand beaches surrounding a stunning turquise lagoon. A large tropical tree overhangs the lagoon in this spot and the late afternoon sun was filtered through the branches for a few minutes each day, providing a dramatic backdrop of light rays that danced from one colorful starfish to the next.

I find that underwater photography is the most challenging aspect of my work, so any critique or commentary would be greatly appreciated. This scene was much more difficult to shoot than it appears. I didn't bring a strobe on this trip due to weight considerations so I had to shoot everything with ambient light. To get the depth of field needed for this image, I shot at f22 at ISO 1200 and 1/60 second which was barely fast enough to freeze the camera in the surging waves of the lagoon. The intensity of the light beams and the overall exposure varied second by second depending on the wind and the way the light filtered through the branches of the tree. The sun drops toward sunset much more quickly at the equator than temperate latitudes and I was amazed at how quickly the beams advanced across the sandy bottom and how quickly the exposure time increased as I was following the underwater light. Despite the challenges, the Canon 5D Mark II is the perfect tool for underwater photography with it's resolution and high ISO performance. I used an Aquatica housing and I can highly recommend it for anyone considering underwater photography. My only minor complaint is that the dome on the housing leaves images a bit soft on the edges, even at f22. If any of you guys have any tips on dealing with that issue I would love to hear from you.

I'm really enjoying all of the autumn photography everyone has posted over the last month- this has been a banner year for NPNers!!!

-Mike

Comments

50 comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on November 26, 2010 at 4:03 AM
I was wondering what shot you'd end your posting drought with--well, this is a fitting 'Welcome Back, Mike' shot!! Just friggin incredible. In a perfect world i could see the front of the starfish a little sharper--but i really don't care cause i dont even want to think about how ridiculously difficult just pulling this off was. The light rays and lit fish in the bg really make the shot for me--the starfish is just icing on the cake. I look forward to more! :toast:
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Cameron on November 26, 2010 at 4:03 AM
Love the silvery fish and the wonderful echo of the star burst of filtered light from the ocean surface and the way it mimics the starfish in warm colours below. The starfish occupies a very prominent position and consequently your attention is drawn very much to it so with the depth of field being pushed to the limits and perhaps slighty beyond the drop in sharpness does tend to distract a little. Just read the bit about your dome housing.. is it that for definite, or depth of field issues, I would have expected to see the lower and upper corners of the image suffer not just the lower, also increased fall off of sharpness in the corners of the image compared with the same point at the middle bottom of image.
Registered on August 6, 2004, 1125 Posts, 3318 Comments
Comment posted by Winnie Ho on November 26, 2010 at 4:34 AM
The lighting is wonderful, almost theatric, and I like how the fish are going in opposite directions. It feels like a wonderful moment Mike! I feel the softness right at the bottom of the image detracts a little from an otherwise perfect image.
Registered on January 6, 2008, 93 Posts, 1788 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on November 26, 2010 at 4:39 AM
Great shot to mark your return. I love the celestial feel to this with those rays coming through the water and the overall simple design to this image. I was surprised to see that f22 didn't give you quite enough DOF - I wasn't aware that housing reduces the DOF at a give aperture.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Anderson on November 26, 2010 at 5:09 AM
KKY,

Thanks for the comment! Depth of field in underwater photography is a huge challenge. Your camera doesn't actually focus on the subject- the focus is on a virtual image on the dome and the range of DOF gets dramatically reduced as a result. I still don't quite get it from a physics point of view but you can read about it on www.wetpixel.com. However, I actually think that 80% of the focus problem at the bottom of this image is due to the curvature of the dome rather than limited DOF. Seems that is just part of the deal with UW photography. I can tell you it is REALLY fun despite (or possibly because of) the challenges. It's fun to be able to shoot all day rather than scout and then shoot mostly at the golden hour.

-Mike
Registered on January 31, 2006, 228 Posts, 3072 Comments
Comment posted by Abdullaziz Bin Ali on November 26, 2010 at 5:11 AM
Wow Mike
this is awesome
the DOF is excellent
love the fish in the back it gives some realty and depth

Perfect
Registered on May 31, 2009, 112 Posts, 1590 Comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on November 26, 2010 at 5:25 AM
The light is utterly stunning and shows well that underwater is a completely different world. The two bigger fishes are wonderful - one with the killer rim light and the other one silhouetted. I'm on the fence about the softness of the starfish but I understand your explanation about the DOF and maybe it's just not possible to get it right with this kind of equipment. Anyway - this is an outstanding image as is, Michael.
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Anderson on November 26, 2010 at 5:57 AM
Ian,

Thanks for the insightful comments. The reason you don't see the dome blurring in the upper corners is because the top of the image was cropped about 10%. I feel that about 80% of the softness at the bottom is due to the curvature of the dome and maybe 20% from limited DOF by getting a couple inches too close to the starfish. Here is a discussion of the 'virtual image' which makes DOF so tricky. http://www.uwphotographyguide.com/dome-port-optics

My housing allows me to manually zoom the 16-35mm lens or focus it but not both. So I've been using the zoom manually and using spot autofocus when I compose the scene. It's one more challenge but I can't tell you how fun it is to experiment and be able to photograph all day long!

-Mike
Registered on January 31, 2006, 228 Posts, 3072 Comments
Comment posted by Giovanni Russello on November 26, 2010 at 6:43 AM
Very nice and unique. We do not see much of underwater photography over here.

gio
Registered on January 21, 2007, 95 Posts, 1617 Comments
Comment posted by Paulo A.Lopes on November 26, 2010 at 7:37 AM
i like it a lot! witch lens do you use for this one?
Registered on October 14, 2008, 122 Posts, 836 Comments
Comment posted by Eva McDermott on November 26, 2010 at 8:31 AM
Magical light Mike. I like the composition a lot but the softness at the bottom does distract some. I think the light however more than makes up for that challenge you encountered with the dome on your underwater housing.
Registered on January 4, 2009, 1015 Posts, 13229 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on November 26, 2010 at 10:07 AM
Unique perspective for NPN ESS and impossibly beautiful light. Those two fish create a bit of yin and yang in the center of the photo right where it's needed.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on November 26, 2010 at 10:26 AM
That is just some fantastic light and color. The 2 fish swiming by are a great addition also. The softness of the starfish distracts a little, but this is just awesome anyways. I'm sure it is very hard to capture something like this, and this one is wonderful.

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI.
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Jason Miles Kirk on November 26, 2010 at 10:29 AM
Hi Mike,

First - your composition is fantastic! I might dial back some of the highlights in the sand if they were not completely blown - but that is a minor nit.

As others have said the lack of focus over this horned sea star (?) is the most distracting element. I think this is one of the most difficult things about underwater work with a rectilinear optic. The dome ports available for the Aquatica series are very good - I use the 9.25" Megadome myself - and using the correct match of port/extenders for a particular lens/camera are an absolute must.

If you've checked with Aquatica to make sure you have the right adapters and are using the largest port they offer (which will cut down on these effects) then the only thing I can think of that would completely fix this problem is to use a fisheye lens. These optics will almost completely eliminate the effects of field curvature from the dome. You can get them in a variety of zooms - Tokina makes the most popular at 10-17mm.

The thing I really like about them is that you can focus them to infinity and stop down to f8 and the entire scene from a few inches in front of the port to infinity is nice and sharp.

Hope this helps!

-Jason
Registered on January 9, 2007, 7 Posts, 55 Comments
Comment posted by Koveh Tavakkol on November 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM
Mike,

This is a beautiful capture. As others have mentioned my only nitch would be the very bottom being a little out of focus. That said I can definitely relate to how difficult underwater photography is. I just recently got back from a dive trip and wrote about the challenges on my blog. I also love how everything we shoot underwater is pretty much new and never seen before. =)

Anyhow, back to the image. I love the blue water and capturing the light rays like you did is just fantastic. I am pretty new to underwater photography myself, so by no means an expert, but I am shocked that you are having the DoF issues. Do you think it is possibly because you were too close to the subject? I use a fisheye lens though, so that has something to do with it, as it seems to do pretty well in the dome. Also I use an 8" dome which is very large. I have found that with the fisheye I hardly ever get to that small of an aperture. You usually don't have to deal with with subjects super far out, so using an aperture in the F8-F16 range has yielded nice sharp images. Lastly a strobe adds quite a bit as you already know, but the weight is an issue. I nearly broke my back carrying the udnerwater gear with two strobes and random other photography stuff on my recent trip. =)

Good to see you back and posting, and I really love your underwater work as much as your above land shots.

Cheers,
Koveh
Registered on September 1, 2009, 41 Posts, 608 Comments
Comment posted by Nicolaus Wegner on November 26, 2010 at 11:47 AM
From what little experience I have with underwater photography I can only recommend that you shoot with cropping in mind and take out the soft edges afterwards. Probably not possible on this shot as you wanted to include so much. For an oceanscape it's quite good. Unfortunate that this site does not have an underwater gallery. I have a few from the Similan and Koh Chang Islands I always wanted to share. ;]

Great shot Mike, and quite a refreshing outlook on the underworld. Looks like paradise. Makes me want to grab my snorkel and go free diving again.
Registered on February 21, 2010, 133 Posts, 1509 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Budliger on November 26, 2010 at 11:57 AM
Bad ass....Wow, I'm speechless.
Registered on June 11, 2006, 113 Posts, 2116 Comments
Comment posted by Jeffrey Sipress on November 26, 2010 at 12:02 PM
This is magical. It takes me away to another world. I couldn't possibly nitpik anything here. Thanks for the trip!
Registered on February 17, 2004, 236 Posts, 1197 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on November 26, 2010 at 12:12 PM
Amazing, Mike! The light beams from above are just incredible, and the simplicity of the composition is not something we see from underwater work that much. The blurring on the starfish is distracting, of course, but I completely understand the troubles of underwater work having dabbled in it a little myself. I wonder, if you got the Nikon 14-24 if that would work better under water -- the front element is bulbous like a fisheye, so a rounded dome on the housing might not affect it as much. Perhaps worth looking into (I just got one myself, not for underwater, but because the lens is just damn good).
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Geoffrey Baker on November 26, 2010 at 12:28 PM
This is awesome and could be even better with more DOF :smile:
Well done indeed.

Geoff.
Registered on August 20, 2010, 192 Posts, 980 Comments
Comment posted by dean hebert on November 26, 2010 at 12:44 PM
Great shot and comp! :toast: I really wish the starfish was sharper but I understand.
Registered on August 4, 2010, 70 Posts, 1132 Comments
Comment posted by Kory Lidstrom on November 26, 2010 at 1:06 PM
Just awesome. Part of the starfish looks a tad out of focus, but I can overlook that with this one.
Registered on November 19, 2008, 49 Posts, 1035 Comments
Comment posted by Adam Gibbs on November 26, 2010 at 1:28 PM
Technical issues aside this is a great image Michael. The two opposing fish are a real bonus.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 168 Posts, 870 Comments
Comment posted by David Edwards on November 26, 2010 at 1:37 PM
Great shot Mike. The light beams and fish make a fabulous bg to the starfish. I see what you mean about the image being soft around the edges, and it's a shame the starfish is a little soft at the front. Even so, this is a wonderful capture in the difficult conditions.
:toast:
Registered on December 6, 2008, 142 Posts, 2623 Comments
Comment posted by Jimmy Gekas on November 26, 2010 at 1:46 PM
AMAZING! :toast:
Registered on July 26, 2007, 244 Posts, 2807 Comments
Comment posted by Kartik Venkatarama on November 26, 2010 at 2:13 PM
This would've been a killer image with just the light and the fg. But what makes it epic are the fish...incredible! The symmetry is perfect...one mid ground, one background...one swimming left, one right...and of course, one lit, one in silhouette
Registered on July 27, 2007, 197 Posts, 830 Comments
Comment posted by Youssef Ismail on November 26, 2010 at 3:54 PM
Michael,

I was just thinking last week that we have not seen anything from you in a long while. So to see this now is great. I think it is very cool that you keep challenging yourself with new techniques and this one seems like a great challenge. The OOF areas on the bottom are noticeable but really are not very objectionable and I would not make to much of it. Looking forward to more underwater photography from you. If I find anything on underwater focusing through a dome lens I will try to digest it and explain it better to you. Maybe I can put my Ph.D. to some good use. :smile:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 474 Posts, 5555 Comments
Comment posted by Lance Warley on November 26, 2010 at 4:09 PM
Incredibly beautiful, Mike.

I'm glad you described wwhat went into this shot, because this is clearly a case of making the image.

I'm surprised no one mentioned the fish on top, which add even more, in addition to the aspects already mentioned.
Registered on April 18, 2007, 52 Posts, 459 Comments
Comment posted by David E Lester on November 26, 2010 at 4:33 PM
Stunning, I wish I had my diving days back and do what I like to do now with photography..Thanks for sharing !!!
Registered on March 24, 2010, 155 Posts, 793 Comments
Comment posted by Wayne Rhodus on November 26, 2010 at 5:19 PM
Simply wonderful from foreground to background Michael. Great work! :toast:
Registered on November 16, 2003, 157 Posts, 3326 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel Ewert on November 26, 2010 at 5:44 PM
This is glorious! Awesome work, Michael.
Registered on June 2, 2009, 103 Posts, 1500 Comments
Comment posted by Arnab Banerjee on November 26, 2010 at 7:44 PM
Great comp - how did you do it w/o a strobe? Fantastic
Registered on January 3, 2007, 313 Posts, 2270 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Anderson on November 26, 2010 at 10:53 PM
Welcome back Mike!

I'm diggin' this photo! The light from above is quite is epiphanic !
I can only imagine the fun you must have been having bouncing a drift in the currents trying to nail a perfect capture of time. I'm glad your back safe and (I'm guessing) full and recharged on experiences only travel can bring. Travel and experiencing other culture and regions is better than any drug IMHO.

:toast:
Registered on September 6, 2007, 346 Posts, 2696 Comments
Comment posted by Pramod Viswanath on November 26, 2010 at 11:17 PM
Spellbound. Amazing image Mike!
Registered on December 4, 2008, 60 Posts, 697 Comments
Comment posted by Jeremy Kessler on November 26, 2010 at 11:21 PM
Beautiful and unique as always. :toast:
Registered on September 13, 2007, 36 Posts, 1283 Comments
Comment posted by Ben Horne on November 27, 2010 at 12:20 AM
Spectacular shot. I do wish the foreground was a bit sharper, but I definitely understand the limitations you were working with. That being said, you could easily crop above the sea star and still have a rock solid composition with the light beams and the fish.
Registered on August 27, 2009, 51 Posts, 959 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on November 27, 2010 at 5:20 AM
Thanks for the discussion on DOF Mike.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Dorin Bofan on November 27, 2010 at 7:26 AM
Superb image, Mike! Despite the challenges, I can easily see the fun you had doing this. Thank you for showing us places that most of us will probably never see. Although, I personally hope one day I'll be there. :smile:
Registered on April 30, 2007, 122 Posts, 3086 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Tal on November 27, 2010 at 9:41 AM
Mike, it's always a treat to see new work from you. This is one of the best composed underwater images I can think of and the color palette is wonderful.

Guy
Registered on November 1, 2003, 566 Posts, 15507 Comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on November 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM
When I saw the thumbnail I thought for sure this had to be photoart. A gorgeous capture to say the least.
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on November 27, 2010 at 7:18 PM
Mike,

As always, the two of us getting back from separate trips pretty much the same week. :smile:

My thoughts about the image - WOW! What Guy said, one of (if not) the best underwater comp/light I have seen. Stunning! .....That said though, it is a definite bummer about the primary subject up front not being in focus. Without any experience with the housing you're using, I can't suggest anything in that regard. I'm gathering this is more of DOF issue and not edge sharpness since the top edge looks comparably sharp (unless cropping was done). If that's the case it would just depend on how well you could hold this position (not exactly, but close enough) to pull off a DOF aperture blend.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Phillip Noll on November 27, 2010 at 10:16 PM
Wow! Very cool photo! The light is amazing and I like the opposing fish. Others have mentioned the soft focus on the starfish and the hot spots in the sand but even with those issues this is really a wonderful image! :toast:
Registered on November 17, 2003, 207 Posts, 1083 Comments
Comment posted by Greg Lessard on November 28, 2010 at 7:44 AM
Mike the shot is outstanding! I hate to ask, but did you get any other shots of that starfish? If its in focus, you might photoshop it into this image. I hate to start the shoot nature as we see it vs. the digitally manipulate the image debate, but it may be another solution. Other wise, as said earlier you might try to shoot with cropping in mind.

This image is so cool, it makes me want to get trained in SCUBA, buy the necessary equipment and start making underwater pictures ASAP! You've definitely got a winner here.
Registered on January 14, 2009, 38 Posts, 219 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on November 28, 2010 at 2:47 PM
Phenomenal Mike. Simply Phenomenal.

Glad to see an image from you. Even though you're the one experiencing it, it's sure great for you to share your adventures and wonderful imagery with us. Thanks!

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Gabi Lach on November 28, 2010 at 4:48 PM
Absolutely amazing! :toast:
Registered on May 1, 2007, 101 Posts, 3187 Comments
Comment posted by Vance Gese on November 28, 2010 at 11:46 PM
Phenomenal, awesome, spectacular image, Michael. Absolutely phenomenal, awesome, and spectacular.
Registered on November 13, 2008, 298 Posts, 6629 Comments
Comment posted by Catherine Reilly on November 29, 2010 at 1:20 AM
Shoot! This is unbelievable!
Registered on August 16, 2006, 603 Posts, 9192 Comments
Comment posted by Naret Visesvongsa on November 29, 2010 at 3:18 AM
This is a stunning shot. Your effort pay back very well for this one.
Registered on November 10, 2010, 6 Posts, 73 Comments
Comment posted by Arild Heitmann on November 29, 2010 at 9:13 AM
I`ve already commented on another site, but this just looks fantastic. The light piercing down towards the starfish...amazing!
Registered on October 13, 2010, 27 Posts, 378 Comments
Comment posted by Luis Argerich on December 2, 2010 at 11:18 AM
Mike,
I'm so sorry for being so late to comment your photo.
It's one of the photos that really grabbed my brains from the many beautiful pics I see on NPN.
The light and the composition are amazing.
Congrats for making this beutiful piece of art.
:toast:
Registered on December 22, 2009, 91 Posts, 1349 Comments