Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Leaf Jam
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Leaf Jam

by Dale King

Gallery: LandscapePosted October 22, 201096 views10 comments
I took this near the end of a long day and didn't bother to switch lenses so ended up with a significant crop. The water had very little color but I did desaturate it even more. I particularly liked the angles of the stick and leaf stems. C&C appreciated.

Nikon D300
Nikkor 35mm 1.8

Comments

10 comments
Comment posted by Barbara Graham on October 22, 2010 at 9:23 PM
I really like the angles, the colors and the textures of the wet leaves.
Registered on July 27, 2010, 1310 Posts, 5035 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on October 22, 2010 at 9:40 PM
Intriguing. I feel a bit unbalanced as I look at this. (I know some would say I'm always unbalanced, but I'm not talking about that type of unbalanced, if you know what I mean.) The desaturated colors make the remaining color look precarious. This has a very arty feel to it.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Dale King on October 22, 2010 at 10:28 PM
Tony and Barbara,
Thanks for your comments. Tony, I think I understand how it seems unbalanced as it is a bit of an unusual angle. I wish I had taken more time with it but in reality I my shooting location was pretty restricted. Arty, that's a good thing right, LOL.
Registered on January 2, 2010, 5 Posts, 53 Comments
Comment posted by Jason Kim on October 23, 2010 at 2:10 AM
I do like the leafs, there's something about the way they're lit that is really nice. I saw this earlier today and thought it was interesting, and I definitely like it more the second time that I've spent some time looking at it. Very intriguing image.
Registered on July 1, 2006, 60 Posts, 1233 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Sieren on October 23, 2010 at 10:40 AM
Dale, great eye on selective what to desaturate!
Registered on January 2, 2008, 360 Posts, 5321 Comments
Comment posted by Dietrich Gloger on October 23, 2010 at 3:40 PM
Excellent work Dale! The water looks great - removing all color was a good idea.
Registered on January 26, 2007, 360 Posts, 9876 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on October 23, 2010 at 5:02 PM
Dale,

I see this is your first post. Welcome to NPN and the ES&S Gallery! I'm so glad I opened this because to be honest, the thumbnail didn't look all that appealing. But now I see the color treatment more obviously and I think you've succeeded quite nicely in that regard - and yes, a bit artsy! Granted, not the most attractive cluster of leaves, but I think with your chosen viewpoint, the diagonals and your color treatment, I think this is quite excellent actually. I like this very much.

welcome aboard. We look forward to your participation and thank you for your comments already!

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on October 24, 2010 at 4:08 AM
What a cool subject! I love the comp--very edgy.
I have a slightly different take on the sat issue: to me, it looks too intentional or forced. Ive seen way too many photos with the selective saturation trick--usually you see it with flowers but autumn leaves are another common one--it's become a bit cliche and gimmicky to me. IMHO--the last thing you want here is for this to look cliche. The very strength of this is it's very 'natural' or as-found look. The selective sat here is counterproductive IMO--personally id leave whatever color there was intact, or slightly desturated so its not so obvious. Just my take. :wavey:
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Dale King on October 24, 2010 at 8:54 AM
Stan,
Thanks for your comments. I agree about selective saturation being a gimmick. I may have overstated the amount of color I removed from the water. When I looked back at the raw file the only color I could see in the water was from a submerged leaf just above and to the left of the leaf group. I did enhance the leaf group somewhat so I'm partially guilty but sometimes nature can look more photoshopped than it really is.
Registered on January 2, 2010, 5 Posts, 53 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on October 24, 2010 at 9:19 AM
Very true...
I was also probably biased by your admission that you desturated--with a second look this doesnt look as 'obvious' as it did on the first look. I think it probably just needs a real minor tweaking. Depends on your target audience, of course.
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments