Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Belted Kingfisher on a mission
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Belted Kingfisher on a mission

by Margaret Saint Cla

Gallery: AvianPosted November 14, 20036,759 views30 comments
I suppose this is a counterpoint to the restful, but still alert as always, female that Jay Barnes posted. I was trying to photograph some Wood Ducks in deep shade today, when I heard this guy and saw him hovering in a distance. By the time I was able to lock focus, he was almost past me. Although it is only a little over a third of the frame, it is larger than anything else I've been able to get of them in flight. I like that it is not the tight bullet that I usually capture. This is my first attempt to use the PhotoShop raw filter, so let me have it with suggestions.

Thanks for looking,
Margaret

Forgot to add the details yet again---
Nikon D1
300mm w/TC2.0
f/6.3 @ 1/2000
iso 200

Comments

30 comments
Comment posted by Brian E. Small on November 14, 2003 at 12:26 AM
Margaret...........all I could think to say on this one was HOLY SHI** :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 147 Posts, 933 Comments
Comment posted by Garth McElroy on November 14, 2003 at 5:18 AM
Totally agree with Brian!! :eek: :eek: :eek: Amazing!
Registered on November 1, 2003, 248 Posts, 4406 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Zipp on November 14, 2003 at 7:37 AM
Beautiful shot Margerat! Quite a difficult caputure! No suggestions from here.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 86 Posts, 940 Comments
Comment posted by Matthew Pugh on November 14, 2003 at 7:40 AM
Just simply amazing & very very very good.
I love the wing positions & detail, and you even got a catchlight
:eek:

Best Regards
Matthew
Registered on November 1, 2003, 72 Posts, 1230 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Ross on November 14, 2003 at 7:51 AM
Nothing to fault here captured perfectly with exposure and wing position. If anything though the head may be soft (compared to the wing area) , like focus has locked on the wing, or it may be the JPEGing only way to tell is examining the full size file.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 403 Posts, 2729 Comments
Comment posted by Bob Steele on November 14, 2003 at 8:01 AM
Let me join in with a few

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:

A remarkable and wonderful capture Margaret. I really, really wish this was mine...
Registered on November 1, 2003, 354 Posts, 13896 Comments
Comment posted by David Gottlieb on November 14, 2003 at 8:07 AM
Are you kidding me??The only time I see them hovering is when my camera is elsewhere..normally I can't even get close enough to get anything..This one is amazing..
Registered on November 1, 2003, 436 Posts, 1790 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Heironymus on November 14, 2003 at 10:14 AM
:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: <br>I've been trying all summer for a Kingfisher! What's wrong with me?
Registered on November 1, 2003, 36 Posts, 1110 Comments
Comment posted by Jay Barnes on November 14, 2003 at 10:49 AM
KILLER shot, Margeret! You caught her at a great angle. An instant later and she would have been too far past you.

Since you asked for Adobe RAW help... This isn't a nit, but increasing the saturation might have helped separate the bird's nice coloring from the background a bit more. You could increase the saturation to the point that the sky is almost cooked and then back the sky off with a Hue Adjustment Layer after pulling it into PS. (Select 'blues' from the drop-down, select the left eye-dropper, click on the sky, then lower the sat. or lightness until it looks 'right') I don't know if it would help this image any since it already looks fantastic, but it's a thought. :smile:

One thing I often do when using Adobe RAW and C1, at least when the shot calls for it, is increase the saturation WAY too much, then compensate for it by bringing the contrast way down. This will give you much softer colors, or the appearance of soft morning/evening light, and remove the harsh 'RGB look' that some images have. To my eye, it gives a more 'Velvia-like' coloring that can work well in some cases. One of the nice things about shooting RAW is that you can go to extremes with stuff like this without increasing noise or trashing the color palette.

Registered on November 1, 2003, 231 Posts, 1153 Comments
Comment posted by Skip Layman on November 14, 2003 at 11:12 AM
Absolutely fantastic! Color me a bright jealous green!

:toast:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 558 Posts, 1704 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on November 14, 2003 at 11:40 AM
What a <i>jaw-dropper</i> of an image! I too am one of the vast majority who can't ever seem to get within photo range of this species. Getting one on the wing like this is hard to imagine, and yet here you've shown it is possible.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Rob Palmer on November 14, 2003 at 12:25 PM
I agree with all the previous comments. Beautiful capture, well done. Way to go. etc, etc.
Registered on November 13, 2003, 132 Posts, 367 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Neely on November 14, 2003 at 12:46 PM
Brian said it all.:eek:

Very nice image.

jn
Registered on November 1, 2003, 22 Posts, 180 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Royse on November 14, 2003 at 12:49 PM
:eek: Amazing! :eek:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 218 Posts, 2427 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Davidson on November 14, 2003 at 2:38 PM
Wow! :eek: :eek: :eek: Killer KF, Margaret! I can't get close enough for even a perched image of this species! This image gives a wonderful view of the Kingfisher!
Chris Davidson
Registered on November 1, 2003, 38 Posts, 815 Comments
Comment posted by Milo Burcham on November 14, 2003 at 2:40 PM
WOWWWWWWW!
Registered on November 1, 2003, 80 Posts, 584 Comments
Comment posted by Dusty Veideman on November 14, 2003 at 3:11 PM
Nice to see that this can actually be done!!!!! INCREDIBLE IMAGE!
Now I can plan the next 20 years to get one like this....maybe!
Dusty V
Registered on November 1, 2003, 295 Posts, 547 Comments
Comment posted by Justin on November 14, 2003 at 5:39 PM
Absolutely superb shot in every way. :toast: :toast:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 106 Posts, 1697 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Keown on November 14, 2003 at 8:33 PM
WOW! :jump: :jump: :jump:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 13 Posts, 479 Comments
Comment posted by Margaret Saint Cla on November 14, 2003 at 10:35 PM
Oh my! Thank you all for your comments! I can definately see that I am not the only one who has been hoping for a catch of this tricky, speed demon. You'll each have your lucky day too, I'm sure. Fortunately, I had exposure compensation set at -.7 for the Wood Ducks, as I only had time to either extend the monopod legs or reset exposure. Normally, I would not have been shooting into a sunny, noon sky at 6.3, but I'm glad I didn't have time to adjust, as I would likely have blown the opportunity. Chris, the focus is fairly even across the bird, although the shot before this does show a bit better focus on the head (but tucked in wings and some motion blur :frown: ). Jay, thank you so much for taking the time to so carefully explain some adjustment techniques. I was just about to repost it with the added saturation, but am not yet quite happy with the sky color. The Kingfisher does stand out better, though. I had less success on this image with the saturation/contrast method.

Margaret
Registered on November 1, 2003, 12 Posts, 36 Comments
Comment posted by Wayne Richardson on November 15, 2003 at 7:15 PM
Hi Margaret

An excellent flight capture, regardless of the species, & there is a better one still in there with some PS tweaking.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 34 Posts, 304 Comments
Comment posted by Neil Fitzgerald on November 15, 2003 at 7:50 PM
:eek: That has got to be one of those Nat Geo stuffed bird photos, but I can't see the wires anywhere! Incredible capture.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 0 Posts, 3 Comments
Comment posted by Al Menk on November 16, 2003 at 6:43 AM
Amazing :jump:

Al Menk
Registered on November 12, 2003, 36 Posts, 149 Comments
Comment posted by Tom Whelan on November 16, 2003 at 11:34 PM
Congrats on your honor- and hello again, Margaret! It's been far too long since I've seen one of your shots.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 35 Posts, 116 Comments
Comment posted by Herman Blockx on November 17, 2003 at 5:18 AM
excellent flight shot! a real beauty and a well deserved pic. of the week!
Registered on November 1, 2003, 238 Posts, 760 Comments
Comment posted by Eric Isley on November 18, 2003 at 4:34 PM
Cropped or not you nailed this one on focus and exposure and the details are all still here at this cropped size, These are fast birds and you did a great job just to get her into focus let alone stop the action nicely ahd hit the exposure dead on also.. I took one of these about a month ago but it wasn't sharp and it was only a pin prick in the frame so not worth keeping..

Congrats on the pick of the week here. Well deserved.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 24 Posts, 422 Comments
Comment posted by Paula Graham on November 19, 2003 at 5:45 PM
Can't say anything but "WOW".
Registered on November 1, 2003, 34 Posts, 902 Comments
Comment posted by Daniella T. on February 5, 2004 at 1:45 PM
This is a breathtaking photo! How did you manage to take that bird in flight? they fly fast and they are hard to get close to...well done! awesome flight pose too!
Registered on January 9, 2004, 41 Posts, 512 Comments
Comment posted by Gregory Lazzaro on September 29, 2006 at 5:25 PM
Nicely taken, good detail, nice panning.

Greg
:toast:
Registered on September 2, 2006, 39 Posts, 143 Comments
Comment posted by Laurie Braman on November 23, 2007 at 8:16 PM
Margaret: Talk about being in the right place at the right time. Wonderful job capturing this magnificent photo!

Laurie
Registered on November 22, 2007, 14 Posts, 71 Comments