Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Picked up a friend
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Picked up a friend

by Rick Lundh

Gallery: LandscapePosted September 5, 20054,167 views26 comments
This is Indian Beach in Ecola State Park, on the Oregon Coast. I picked up this little feller in Seaside, and thought he ought to be freed...so I set him down...and nothing!?! :confused: I took the fact that he didn't run off, a sign that he or she...would rather be a "star" and have it's picture posted on the web... :rolleyes:

OK, seriously now...I was somewhat pleased to have the moment of light on the sand right in front of the placed starfish...
Yo thoughts?

Nikon D2X
Sigma 10-20mm

Comments

26 comments
Comment posted by Doug Dolde on September 5, 2005 at 6:44 PM
Great composition..that little starfish is the icing on the cake. Looks like you had more dynamic range than you could handle though...two blended exposures might have made it more enticing.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 305 Posts, 3900 Comments
Comment posted by INGOMA on September 5, 2005 at 6:46 PM
Great picture. I agree with Doug, the sun is overexposed. Could you still fix that by blending two version of the same RAW file?
Regards,
Christoph
Registered on July 2, 2004, 231 Posts, 3110 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Lundh on September 5, 2005 at 7:02 PM
This is two blended exposures...I should have mentioned that. I'm gonna have to try to do something with it, I guess...I didn't know if that blown sun would be OK with the scene...
Registered on April 28, 2004, 774 Posts, 4351 Comments
Comment posted by Kent Newton on September 5, 2005 at 7:32 PM
I think it works as it is, Rick. Of course, if you CAN fix the sun, I'd like to see the revised version. :smile:
Registered on May 22, 2005, 308 Posts, 761 Comments
Comment posted by Alice Scoggins on September 5, 2005 at 7:53 PM
The blown sun doesn't bother me, but the dark area to the left is a bit of a distraction. I would crop a little off the top to eliminate the little grey cloud URC. I love the light on the starfish. Did you get any close-ups of the starfish and the water/shore?
Registered on February 21, 2005, 430 Posts, 5959 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on September 5, 2005 at 8:26 PM
The colors and light are gorgeous here, Rick. You've done a great job of blending AFAIC. Shooting into the sun like this normally makes it nearly impossible to find any detail in the foreground. Yours is all lit up and glowing nicely.

Now about the starfish. You don't need it. This pic, IMO, would work great without it. Between the reflection and the curving water, this seems quite complete.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on September 5, 2005 at 8:42 PM
Nicely done, Rick. I have to agree with Tony about the starfish. I think the sweet light and the graceful curve of the water carry this image.

Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Baumbach on September 5, 2005 at 8:43 PM
I totally agree with Tony. I don't mind the burnt out sun at all but as someone who's spent time at the ocean, the starfish looks like a dried starfish that you placed there and IMHO it ruins the shot.

- Dan.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 473 Posts, 7980 Comments
Comment posted by Duane Rosenkranz on September 5, 2005 at 8:43 PM
I think this is a beautiful shot. I don't have any problem with the sun at all.
:toast:
Duane Rosenkranz
Registered on October 13, 2004, 280 Posts, 2661 Comments
Comment posted by Todd Caudle on September 5, 2005 at 8:51 PM
Very nice!
Registered on November 9, 2003, 472 Posts, 3705 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Tal on September 5, 2005 at 8:57 PM
Very nicely composed. I also like the light and detail in the sand.
Not sure about the starfish. It does look like it was placed there (it hovers over the sand where I would expect it to be partially submerged) but at the same time it goes well with the scene.

Guy
Registered on November 1, 2003, 566 Posts, 15507 Comments
Comment posted by Dane Glueck on September 5, 2005 at 9:15 PM
Fantastic comp and sweet light. I agree with extending the range of the scene just a bit with possibly combining two images. In regards to the starfish - I think that's up to you. The purists / photographers may be right that this works without the starfish as well or better, but if you're looking to sell the image, I would guess the starfish version would win out.
Registered on November 10, 2003, 193 Posts, 1748 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Lundh on September 5, 2005 at 9:48 PM
Thanks for the comments, I'll admit premeditated intentions as I approached this beach with flashing green dollar signs in my eyes...I'm doing a show in Lincoln City next month at the Casino, and I needed to beef up my stock of cheesy tourist-leading comps :biggrin: I'll drag this guy along with me to the beach until a better comp comes along...
Registered on April 28, 2004, 774 Posts, 4351 Comments
Comment posted by Joseph Kayne on September 5, 2005 at 10:02 PM
I also agree that the sun and sand are good. I have not decided about the marine life in the image.....

Joe.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 573 Posts, 2619 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Dunn on September 5, 2005 at 10:10 PM
Really sweet image, Rick. The sun being a little hot doesn't bother me much, but the starfish does seem a little too contrived. What was your aperature? Any chance that stopping down would have yielded a sunstar to compliment the starfish? :wink:
Registered on February 22, 2004, 35 Posts, 1311 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Lundh on September 5, 2005 at 10:19 PM
Rick...CRAP! Why didn't I think of THAT! MANNNNN!!! Now I'm gonna have to drive over there this week after work and try that again!!!
I was at f/14 here...MAN, I'm kicking myself...thanks buddy... :rolleyes:
Registered on April 28, 2004, 774 Posts, 4351 Comments
Comment posted by Bret Edge on September 5, 2005 at 11:33 PM
Hey Rick,

I coulda been there on the same day! We were just there a few days ago. I didn't come away with anything good, though. You, on the other hand, certainly did. The light is wonderful and the compo is fantastic. I do find the starfish to be a little bit "posed", for lack of a better word. Overall, a definite keeper.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 711 Posts, 6363 Comments
Comment posted by Nye Simmons on September 6, 2005 at 12:19 AM
its just gorgeous - even if the fish looks contrived I dont mind

my frustrations with digital have been the chernobyl sun - sometimes cant avoid it even at minimal aperture - not sure how colr neg would have done - or grad with chrome - ultimately your blend is probably the best solution
Registered on December 12, 2004, 112 Posts, 1111 Comments
Comment posted by Juza on September 6, 2005 at 5:27 AM
Hi Rick,
I really like it, the strarfish is an added bonus IMO! :toast:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 374 Posts, 10466 Comments
Comment posted by Brent Stovall on September 6, 2005 at 10:01 AM
Well done and good commentary.

B.
Registered on December 6, 2004, 54 Posts, 568 Comments
Comment posted by Colleen Townsend on September 6, 2005 at 10:02 AM
VERY NICE SHOT :jump: :jump:
Registered on July 30, 2005, 39 Posts, 260 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Windom on September 6, 2005 at 1:04 PM
While I like the starfish from a compositional point of view I have to agree with others who have said it looks as though it was placed there. It looks "dried out" if that makes any sense....its "legs" are curling up rather than in direct contact with the sand...not something I've seen happen before in a natural setting.

Also, the reflection of the clouds in the water is lighter than the clouds themselves. Reflections are naturally darker than the object being reflected. Should be easy to fix.

This image has alot of potential and with a little more work should be a good seller for you. As is I'ld lose the starfish.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 176 Posts, 2302 Comments
Comment posted by Youssef Ismail on September 7, 2005 at 1:30 AM
Rick,

Neat idea, but I have to agree with Tony and Dan B. on this one. It looks a bit contrived to anyone who spends any amount of time on the beach.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 474 Posts, 5555 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Lundh on September 7, 2005 at 2:13 AM
Youssef,
I think that anyone who has been to the Oregon Coast, or any coast with starfish, will recognize the fact that one does not usually see a starfish taking a casual stroll along the beach, like this guy...instead, we would all expect to see them clung to rocks with a death grip (see attached jpeg for example)
So, contrived...yes, a leader for the eye to draw attention + remind people of the coast...yes as well (all of course IMHO).
Thanks to everyone for their feedback!
Registered on April 28, 2004, 774 Posts, 4351 Comments
Comment posted by Laurent Baig on September 7, 2005 at 6:47 PM
The sun doesn't bother me, but being from Tucson, I'm used to the sun looking blinding like this ;-) I think the starfish is a fun idea. I really like the silhouetted hills.
Registered on January 12, 2005, 206 Posts, 6784 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Borzynski on September 9, 2005 at 3:26 PM
The starfish... Contrived, perhaps, but I still think it adds a lot to the image. I suppose it really is a matter of what you want from the shot - reality, which there seems to be little disagreement that starfish as sitting there just isn't quite right, or an artistic presentation, which I think you have greatly succeeded with.

Thanks for posting.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 109 Posts, 799 Comments