Merced Water Study #2 +2
by Igor Doncov
I went back to the Merced River the following year to shoot some more water impressions. This was shot outside the park near the bridge. This was again an attempt to record water movement. There seemed to be little interest in the last one. Let's see how this one goes.
Canon 6D, 24-105@35mm, 1/6 sec, f/22, ISO 400, tripod
I believe the strange aperture and ISO settings were probably due to the need to get the 1/6 sec exposure given the amount of daylight.
Comments
16 commentsI think a crop from the top eliminating the boulder would work for me...
I agree that these water images seem busy but that's how water is. That's why it's mesmerizing.
I love the tumbling Merced and this captures that feeling beautifully. I think the colors are spot on - at least my desired impressions of the flowing river.
Both versions work for me. The original post I get more of a sense of the chaotic nature of the water tumbling and crashing over the random granite boulders. It almost seems the turbulent water is going in all different directions - that keeps me engaged and looking to find that "down hill" flow. The shutter speeds works perfectly here.
The repost works although for me it removes the mystery of the chaotic flow of the water. In the repost it's clear about the flow. I think rather than a drastic crop off the top, I'm wondering about cloning or dealing with just the little bright area of that dark rock up top? Then you don't need to crop - at least from my perspective.
Also, an interesting thought is that with the crop, I'm kinda wishing for a different shutter speed - a longer, softer presentation of the water. Interesting, because it gets me thinking about when to apply different shutter speeds, depending on the intimacy, or broader view... hmmmm, have to think on that.
In the end, I keep going back to the original post.
Lon
Dave, I'm sorry. I can't remove the dark rock.
Dave also mentioned dodging that upper rock. I do think raising the levels there a tad could help.
Our tastes are all different of course, which makes the world go 'round. I still like the original framing with some of the tweaks to that upper dark rock.
Makes want to drive up to the canyon.
Lon
If you looked at the portion of the Merced in this image it wouldn't look anything like it. Conversely, if you shot an image of a stream at 0.6 secs that looked like this image you would have nothing but white water and rocks. That was my experience. You sort of have to look at white and clear sections of a stream and try to anticipate how they will look in an image. But you really never know exactly. In fact, I found that shooting the same shot from a tripod repeatedly gave different compositions because water doesn't flow the same in real time. There would be more white next to rock and a few seconds later less white. So creating a careful composition in the normal sense was impossible for me. I did my best by shooting compositions from area to area and later cropping the final image to what looked good. Most images had no appealing crop at all. This one is a crop of about 1/2 of the original.
Incidentally, after moving to Bend I tried to shoot similar images but it was drastically different. The black volcanic rock of the cascades just wasn't as appealing as the beautiful granite of the Sierras. The thin film of algae that grows on these rocks adds the warm colors.
Regarding chaos: wait til you see the next one!
I prefer the version you originally posted. It has a natural feel about it that makes this photograph really sing. I can immediately connect with the strength of both the flowing water and the huge boulders that are offering resistance. The resultant path (so well depicted by your chosen shutter speed) illustrates the beauty of fast currents. This is a true depiction of the complexity that can be observed in nature and I see no reason to simplify the scene (further) in an attempt to make it more appealing.
You have quite a treasure trove of old photos. I can't wait to see more.
Regards,
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI.