Gallery: FloraPosted February 7, 20165,462 views6 comments
Found this little beauty at the Alamo, Texas.
Canon EOS 50D
F-stop f/9
Exposure time 1/160 sec
ISO speed 400
Focal length 29 mm
No flash
Comments
6 comments
Comment posted by Bill Fach on February 7, 2016 at 2:47 PM
Elizabeth: Looks like this is your first Flora post so welcome to the finest Flora gallery on the planet and for helping it remain so. Beautiful subject and overall a solid capture. The only thing that gives me a little pause is your POF. I find the near anthers that are a bit OOF a little distracting. When faced with this kind of subject that has a bit of depth to it I practically wear out my DOF preview, especially if I'm trying to get it with a single capture. It can be tough balancing the desire for full sharpness of the subject while maintaining a pleasingly blurred BG. Great to have you aboard and looking forward to more. >=))>
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1805 Posts, 26981 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on February 7, 2016 at 3:14 PM
A beautiful plant, but not American Columbine. This is a hybrid Spider lily of some sort. There are many hybrid varieties. Google Spider Lily. You will find some close to this.
Welcome to Flora, Elizabeth! This is a very tough plant to get full focus on. You have done a good job except for the near OOF anthers. I have worked Spider Lilies a few times before. The best way, IMO, is to close down to about F16 to F22 and make sure there is no background or use a setup background. I have tried stacking images, but there are too many artifacts created by crossing petals and anthers.
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Barb Pflaum on February 7, 2016 at 7:06 PM
Nice comp and colors. I would like to see more DOF to get all the anthers in focus. But this is still a nice image of a cool looking plant.
Registered on January 14, 2009, 316 Posts, 2724 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on February 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM
A very snazzy looking lily, Elizabeth. I do kind of wish for more dof, but you'd really be pushing the shutter speed unless you had a tripod and no breeze. Did you take any shots from a little lower with the stone wall as the bg? I kind of like the looks of the part of it I can see.
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Wolfenden on February 12, 2016 at 1:39 PM
There have been some very helpful comments already, Elizabeth. I will just add that I think the light on the flowers as seen against the dark background works really well. Hope to see more from you !!
Registered on May 18, 2007, 1108 Posts, 7647 Comments
Comment posted by Elizabeth Holbrook on February 12, 2016 at 2:04 PM
Thank you all for the comments and suggestions. This is my best image of the lily. It was hand held and at a time when I knew even less about the camera than I do now. And boy, do I have a lot more to learn. I am now playing with F-numbers, there is so much to consider with each picture.
Comments
6 commentsWelcome to Flora, Elizabeth! This is a very tough plant to get full focus on. You have done a good job except for the near OOF anthers. I have worked Spider Lilies a few times before. The best way, IMO, is to close down to about F16 to F22 and make sure there is no background or use a setup background. I have tried stacking images, but there are too many artifacts created by crossing petals and anthers.