Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Mistical Highlands
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Mistical Highlands

by Harry Lichtman

Gallery: LandscapePosted January 8, 2016602 views22 comments
This highpoint in the Icelandic Highlands is known for dense fog which can really hamper route finding, especially when the route is snow covered.  Normally a trail would be visible along this stretch, but just miles of snow.  Skiing would have been a better option. I used Chris Chamberlain's idea to re-process the finished file a second time, reducing the clarity all the way.  I selectively erased portions of the mist and clouds on the original file to reveal the enhanced mist effect.  I have thought of croping a little off each end to tighten it up, but the pano crop does work with the stretched out mountains so I am undecided.  I posted the original processing below.

D810, 24-120, ISO 100, f8, 1/180 sec.

Comments

22 comments
Comment posted by Harry Lichtman on January 8, 2016 at 8:25 PM
The original processing without reduced clarity.
Registered on September 17, 2010, 304 Posts, 3507 Comments
Comment posted by Dave Dillemuth on January 8, 2016 at 8:36 PM
Harry,
Very beautiful! That fog and mist are magical. Processing looks good and I really like the softness provided by negitive clarity. As you mention, due to the stretched mountains, this image lends itself very well to a pano treatment. Perhaps you could crop slightly but I don't think you want to crowd the mountains and lose the expansiveness. If I were to crop, I think that I might take some off the right side. The left side has a lot of interesting elements and I would not want to place them any closer to the left side frame.
Registered on December 10, 2015, 104 Posts, 1112 Comments
Comment posted by Vance Gese on January 8, 2016 at 11:01 PM
Love that soft light on those mountains, Harry, as well as the mist and clouds.  Your composition works very well; personnally I would not crop either side as the semi-pano works well with the mountains and the lines and layers of the snow.  Your processing worked out superb.  An outstanding image in my opinion.
Registered on November 13, 2008, 298 Posts, 6629 Comments
Comment posted by Roel Wijtmans on January 9, 2016 at 5:32 AM
Cool effect with the reduced clarity, and thanks a lot for explaining because I was wondering how you obtained the look in your photo! I think I would stick with the crop you have right now, no need to tighten it at the ends. However, I do see another crop with the blue in the sky cropped out, to give a very different atmosphere. Both would work equally well for me. This is great stuff, Harry, the mist and clouds are sweet.
Registered on September 30, 2012, 116 Posts, 2257 Comments
Comment posted by Thomas Haney on January 9, 2016 at 9:33 AM
Beautiful shot Harry, it has great atmosphere and the fog frames the mountians perfectly.  I wouldn't crop in from either side, but I do really like Roel's alternative of cropping out the blue sky, it really changes the mood of the image and with a little darkening of the FG especially the lower left and a little lightening of the mountains it could be pretty interesting.  Just another option but I like this a lot as is.
Registered on April 7, 2013, 138 Posts, 537 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on January 9, 2016 at 9:43 AM
Mistical (or mystical, enlightened) fit this image very well, Harry.  The lack of detail in the original post adds nicely to the sense of mystery while retaining a moderate sense of realism and the combination works very well. 
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on January 9, 2016 at 9:57 AM
Harry, This looks wonderful and I love your processing on the finished image with the reduced clarity. I like this very much as is and don't think I would crop either end. Beautiful image and work! devil

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on January 9, 2016 at 11:04 AM
Beautiful, Harry.  Excellent scene and well done on the processing, too. 
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments
Comment posted by gary phillips on January 9, 2016 at 12:16 PM
Just awesome Harry.  Love this one.  I can imagine you have been spending many enjoyable hours processing these images from your Iceland trip. I sorta agree with Roel about cropping the blue sky out, but you can't go wrong with any presentation of this.  Really sweet.
Registered on October 24, 2013, 185 Posts, 4136 Comments
Comment posted by Doug Koepsel on January 9, 2016 at 12:45 PM
I wonder about reducing the clarity/tonal contrast in that the clouds above the peaks (moreso on the right side) even more so they do not compete with the peaks as much.
 
Registered on April 1, 2010, 196 Posts, 1592 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on January 9, 2016 at 1:30 PM
Harry,

This is stunningly gorgeous!  I think the first words that came to my head were clean and pristine.  Immaculate comes to mind as well.  Just perfect everything... I love this.  I have no nits or suggestions what so ever!

I do have a question about double processing.  I'm going to have to remember, but I may send you or Chris and email at one point to understand how this is done.  Can I assume LR?  I guess I'll have to bone up on that.

Anyway, I can't tell you how much I love this image.  Congrats!

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by David Schoen on January 9, 2016 at 2:17 PM
A stunning presentation and really neat framing effect by the clouds.  Very effective.
Registered on November 6, 2006, 1213 Posts, 4587 Comments
Comment posted by Harry Lichtman on January 9, 2016 at 2:18 PM
Thanks for the comments.  I think the pano crop is a clear winner in the polling. Thanks.  I left the blue sky because I really wanted to keep the top of the cloud on the left.

Lon, I don't use Lightroom.  I just process the RAW in Adobe Camera Raw and finish it up in CS6.  So, the way I processed this image was to make the initial RAW processing which got it very near the final image.  Normally I use a little bit of Clarity adjustment in the initial Camera RAW conversion to improve midtone contrast, as the unprocessed RAW is pretty flat despite the contrast in a scene (this one had bright white snow and very dark volcanic mnt. areas).  I then save as a TIFF.

To double process, I re-open the TIFF file in ACR and then lowered the Clarity slider all the way which maximally reduced the contrast.  I saved this version as Low CLarity.  I then erased to those portions of the Low Clarity for the cloud/mist areas.

I could have also opened the original RAW file and just lowered the Clarity slider, saved under a new name, and then done the same layer / erase.  The ACR is very powerful it seems, and most tonal/color/noise processing can be done here.  Hope that clears up any confusion.
Registered on September 17, 2010, 304 Posts, 3507 Comments
Comment posted by scott lanz on January 9, 2016 at 5:50 PM
Beautiful image with terrific light and atmosphere, Harry. Having gone back and forth, I can definately say that I can't say I like either version (with and without blue sky) any less than the other. enlightened
Registered on November 14, 2003, 840 Posts, 12902 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Fach on January 9, 2016 at 7:17 PM
Harry: I think Iceland is going to find its way to my bucket list. Marvelous scene superbly captured and presented. I kind of like the idea of a crop from the top but this works great for me as is. Most excellent.>=))>
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1805 Posts, 26981 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Wong on January 9, 2016 at 9:03 PM
I love this Harry!! This looks really cold. I wouldn't change a thing.
Registered on February 2, 2006, 79 Posts, 2629 Comments
Comment posted by Albert Darmo on January 9, 2016 at 10:18 PM
Hi  Harrycrying  This is so  wonderfully  crafted,    everything is so perfect and natural .....    love how the beautiful colors of the mountains come through, and are in harmony with the clouds and  mistdevil

Albert Darmo
Canada
Registered on November 25, 2008, 1386 Posts, 11978 Comments
Comment posted by Igor Doncov on January 10, 2016 at 4:52 PM
I love how you handled the fog in this image. It really does feel like fog. I have images like this from 3 years ago that I might try this technique.

I'm also one of those that believes that cropping out the blue sky would improve this image. With that fog the subject is one of muted colors. The bright blue of the sky and some of the shadows goes contrary to the subject matter. I would crop out the sky and desaturate the blue shadows on the right mountain and the large shadow coming from the bottom left. But that's just me.
Registered on November 22, 2014, 189 Posts, 2733 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Cameron on January 11, 2016 at 5:19 AM
A beautiful picture Harry and a superb composition but I definitely prefer the pre- processed post.  The initial one has a sort of "plasticated" feel to it, it is most evident to me in the microdetail of texture beneath the blue shadowed slope, I guess as with everything it is simply personal preference.

 
Registered on August 6, 2004, 1125 Posts, 3318 Comments
Comment posted by Ryan Shain on January 12, 2016 at 10:31 PM
Hi Harry,

I really enjoy how you re-pocessed the image with reduced clarity as it really brings about a more mysterious and soothing mood to the image. I would not crop this image and leave as is. This way the mountains have more room to breath.

Beautiful image and beautiful work in the vision in processing this scene
 
Registered on February 20, 2007, 226 Posts, 4571 Comments
Comment posted by Elizabeth Holbrook on January 21, 2016 at 6:09 PM
Congratulations on your weekly pick win.  Amazing image!
Registered on May 6, 2015, 43 Posts, 221 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Zablotny on February 15, 2016 at 7:28 AM
Awesme & congratsdevil.....................Jim
Registered on January 17, 2004, 705 Posts, 3594 Comments