Comments, critiques and suggestions always welcome.
Comments
13 comments
Comment posted by Roel Wijtmans on January 3, 2016 at 11:32 AM
Vastness is the word that comes to mind here, this looks so incredibly big and vast! The diverse clouds actually add even more of that feeling to the photo, compared to what a uniform sky would have done. This just makes me ant to go out in that piece of land and start roaming and discovering all kind of things. Excellent, Harley!
Registered on September 30, 2012, 116 Posts, 2257 Comments
Comment posted by Dave Dillemuth on January 3, 2016 at 11:49 AM
Harley,
This is very nice. The image lends itself really well to B&W rendering. I like the way the dark clouds along the top, frame the image. Processing looks good. No nits.
Registered on December 10, 2015, 104 Posts, 1112 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on January 3, 2016 at 1:29 PM
Harley, to me this is a "damned if you do and damned if you don't" picture. As is, it is a two thirds/one third, sky/land picture. Both are dramatic. The weight of each is the bone of contention in my mind. I like it as is, but for the gloppiness and softness of the topmost clouds. I like it also by giving weight to the land and removing the soft clouds (and perhaps by adding some contrast to the sky). This crop makes for a skinny panorama and few places for the eye to stop an peruse. Another possibility would be to crop both from the top and the left, thus "fattening up" the panorama.
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Albert Darmo on January 3, 2016 at 4:08 PM
Hi Harley..... To me , this is an awesome image!!! the clouds and the mountains resemble two giants fighting for attention. both combating elements of this fine composition are winners..
Albert Darmo
Canada
Registered on November 25, 2008, 1386 Posts, 11978 Comments
Comment posted by Alberto Patiño on January 3, 2016 at 6:04 PM
I like the composition and the vastness, but what I find especially captivating is the patchy light on the landscape. I love windy days with fast moving clouds, and this is exactly the feeling I get from this image.
Registered on December 2, 2014, 278 Posts, 1736 Comments
Comment posted by David Schoen on January 3, 2016 at 6:49 PM
Very cool. It seems to go on and on. Nice contrast. It is a little busy but I'm easy on anything vast and Utah.
Registered on November 6, 2006, 1213 Posts, 4587 Comments
Comment posted by Stuart Williams on January 4, 2016 at 8:52 AM
gorgeous image harley. i especially like the bottom two thirds and wonder if a little TK cloud sharpening magic may help with the upper third? obviously needs to be seen big.
Registered on December 7, 2007, 247 Posts, 4792 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on January 4, 2016 at 11:23 AM
The large version is a visual treat, Harley. The landscape is so vast and barren; all topped off with those drama laden clouds. This is a beautifully done B&W.
Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Zelinka on January 4, 2016 at 1:56 PM
I love this kind of image - all those layers invite the eye to go roaming further and further. Processing looks solid.
Registered on August 20, 2007, 206 Posts, 998 Comments
Comment posted by gary phillips on January 4, 2016 at 5:43 PM
Real nice Mr. Harley. The perfect compliment to your open country portfolio . The the vast open feel is dear to my heart and is very well depicted in this image. I wouldn't change a thing .
Registered on October 24, 2013, 185 Posts, 4136 Comments
Comment posted by Preston Birdwell on January 5, 2016 at 6:37 PM
First off, the larger versions are a must-see for all the subtle detail.
I like this a lot, Harley. The composition and framing work well for me. One thing you might consider is adding a little light to the lighter greys in the desert. The textures throughout are nicely realized. Well done, sir!
--P
Registered on November 1, 2003, 471 Posts, 5188 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on January 5, 2016 at 9:30 PM
Harley,
This image fits perfectly in your series of the vast, open landscape (the term you use escapes my mind at the moment.) The vastness of the open landscape and the big sky are clearly captured here. I just love the line of high contrast lower clouds - they make the image for me.
Here's the but.... for me, I'm just not connecting with the landscape portion of this; specifically about the lower 1/3. The landscape is screaming out for detail, but yet the vastness and distance just aren't allowing it. I see some detail, contrasts, shapes, land forms, etc., but my eye seems to just wander around looking for something to tell me about the land. Just not sure what it is; perhaps the distance brings in some haziness, dulling some of the details, like in the sides of the mesas or the expanse of lighter areas, I dunno.
A grand landscape and excellent b&w, just not near the top of my favorites from you Harley.
Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on January 6, 2016 at 12:01 PM
What a great looking b&w image, Harley! That 2000 pix version is impressive to look at. The more I look at it the more I keep seeing and enjoying. Love those clouds.
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comments
13 commentsThis is very nice. The image lends itself really well to B&W rendering. I like the way the dark clouds along the top, frame the image. Processing looks good. No nits.
Albert Darmo
Canada
Ed
I like this a lot, Harley. The composition and framing work well for me. One thing you might consider is adding a little light to the lighter greys in the desert. The textures throughout are nicely realized. Well done, sir!
--P
This image fits perfectly in your series of the vast, open landscape (the term you use escapes my mind at the moment.) The vastness of the open landscape and the big sky are clearly captured here. I just love the line of high contrast lower clouds - they make the image for me.
Here's the but.... for me, I'm just not connecting with the landscape portion of this; specifically about the lower 1/3. The landscape is screaming out for detail, but yet the vastness and distance just aren't allowing it. I see some detail, contrasts, shapes, land forms, etc., but my eye seems to just wander around looking for something to tell me about the land. Just not sure what it is; perhaps the distance brings in some haziness, dulling some of the details, like in the sides of the mesas or the expanse of lighter areas, I dunno.
A grand landscape and excellent b&w, just not near the top of my favorites from you Harley.
Lon
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI