Gallery: FloraPosted February 17, 20151,785 views10 comments
Hi all.
More from the files of what I took last year. This one, a cram of an Osteospermum.
Any and all thoughts appreciated.
Nathan
Nikon d7000, Sigma 180 macro, tripod, ISO 400, f4
Comments
10 comments
Comment posted by Bill Fach on February 17, 2015 at 8:24 AM
Nathan: Most excellent. Love the POV and the color palette. My only tiny nit is the small patch of green on the left edge. I would be tempted to make that go away but still very well done.>=))>
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1805 Posts, 26981 Comments
Comment posted by Nathan Buck on February 17, 2015 at 12:40 PM
Ahhhhh. Good catch, Bill! I will definitely make that go away.
Nathan
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1101 Posts, 13589 Comments
Comment posted by John Launstein on February 17, 2015 at 4:12 PM
Holy smokes, Nathan! This one's off the charts for me. Can't disagree with Bill's suggestion but seriously top shelf image even as posted. Spectacular colours and detail where you want it (and not where you don't).
My first, second and third impression were all consistently "WOW--I love this one!" It's interesting that if you study an image long enough trying to figure out ways that MIGHT be an improvement, you usually find some, but there's so much personal taste that gets in the way, never mind that the photographer was dealing with a specific set of circumstances that are largely outside of our grid of understanding when critiquing an image! So with all that in mind, it does occur to me that perhaps the TINIEST bit lower of a camera angle might have reduced or eliminated the soft green diagonal under the flower and created a nice pink vignette giving way directly to the pinks, purples and lavenders of the flower, keeping the green only to right. But that would also seriously blur/block the base of the flower, and would change the image appreciably! I'm betting there would be more cost than reward and you've found the perfect composition and approach here. Just felt like musing for a bit I guess!
Registered on April 5, 2011, 223 Posts, 1193 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Gavin on February 17, 2015 at 6:09 PM
Bill and John said it all; well, almost all. This is an outstanding photo. Only nit: In a perfect world, the tip of far right petal would not have a slight blemish.
Registered on August 14, 2008, 293 Posts, 1250 Comments
Comment posted by Igor Doncov on February 17, 2015 at 6:32 PM
I love these kind of soft closeups. Wish I could do them. Nicely done.
Registered on November 22, 2014, 189 Posts, 2733 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on February 17, 2015 at 8:33 PM
My favorite of the series so far! Absolutely brilliant!
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Nathan Buck on February 18, 2015 at 1:23 AM
Hi all.
Here is a repost, taking into account the green on the left, and the little blemish on the right petal. John, I have another version that I will post soon that was taken in a way that you suggest.
Thanks for all of you kind thoughts and suggestions!
Nathan
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1101 Posts, 13589 Comments
Comment posted by Catherine Reilly on February 19, 2015 at 1:00 AM
Good critiques on this one! The repost takes all of it into account with a most excellent result. Such subtle changes! But that's how we improve, even for you, Nathan, who are at the top of the ladder, so to speak.
Registered on August 16, 2006, 603 Posts, 9192 Comments
Comment posted by Nancy Lea Sandy on February 19, 2015 at 10:33 AM
Looking at your side-by-side posts, I like this version best. The in-focus part of the image seems much sharper. The peek-a-boo openings into the center look like little jewels and act like intriguing puzzle pieces. Wonderful all the way around
Registered on January 24, 2011, 576 Posts, 6942 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Fach on February 20, 2015 at 9:32 AM
Nathan: 2+ thumbs up on the repost.>=))>
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1805 Posts, 26981 Comments
Comments
10 commentsNathan
My first, second and third impression were all consistently "WOW--I love this one!" It's interesting that if you study an image long enough trying to figure out ways that MIGHT be an improvement, you usually find some, but there's so much personal taste that gets in the way, never mind that the photographer was dealing with a specific set of circumstances that are largely outside of our grid of understanding when critiquing an image! So with all that in mind, it does occur to me that perhaps the TINIEST bit lower of a camera angle might have reduced or eliminated the soft green diagonal under the flower and created a nice pink vignette giving way directly to the pinks, purples and lavenders of the flower, keeping the green only to right. But that would also seriously blur/block the base of the flower, and would change the image appreciably! I'm betting there would be more cost than reward and you've found the perfect composition and approach here. Just felt like musing for a bit I guess!
Here is a repost, taking into account the green on the left, and the little blemish on the right petal. John, I have another version that I will post soon that was taken in a way that you suggest.
Thanks for all of you kind thoughts and suggestions!
Nathan