Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Winter bulls
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Winter bulls

by Lon Sharp

Gallery: WildlifePosted February 15, 20152,119 views8 comments
These are young adult bison in Wind Cave National Park, South Dakota. I was lucky to catch some nice warm light coming through after a foggy and frosty sunrise. Bison can look almost black in summer coat, but by mid-winter the bulls have fairly shaggy manes that take on nice hues of yellow and orange/red. When most big mammals are looking shop worn, I like how bison come into their own!

Nikon D610, Tamron 150-600 (I'm liking the versatility of this lens) @ 260mm, 1/400, f9, -0.3ev.

I hesitated whether this arrangement worked with DOF favoring only the leader, but finally decided I liked the overall effect. Your opinions welcome!

Comments

8 comments
Comment posted by Jerry Austin on February 15, 2015 at 7:51 PM
This works for me Lon. The lead bison is really nice. The other two, while not sharp, do add to the image. I really like the dark bison against the light background. Well done.
Registered on January 6, 2012, 651 Posts, 3448 Comments
Comment posted by Sandra M. Apel on February 15, 2015 at 10:53 PM
Lon, I have no problem with the lead bison sharp and the others not. I like the story line of the bison on a crispy winter morning which you have captured well. You may be aware of the artist /painter Oscar Howe from SD ... an image such as this reminds me of his wonderful paintings. My nit is I wish the center and left bison's lead footfall had made the step forward because it gives a bit of an awkward slant to their uphill climb. I do like the image! :smile:
Registered on October 15, 2013, 20 Posts, 171 Comments
Comment posted by Stephen Kaluski on February 16, 2015 at 6:26 AM
Hi Lon, I much prefer Winter scenes as they for me, are far more atmospheric and can convey a lot more within the image. The slight warmth in the 'haw' frost grass is nice and really sets the Bison of well with it's rich colour. I don't think you could do much about trying to give separation, even with moving position, allowing them to walk in 'position/frame'? Nice to see that eye. I know it's optical, but the lead Bison does seem to have a slight lean to the left, but perhaps you were at an angle shooting down an incline? The diagonal line of the hill in the BKG also adds context to the location. I think you would have had to really crank up the ISO from where it was to achieve a lot more DoF, therefore I think you did well.

TFS
Steve
Registered on March 25, 2007, 189 Posts, 1064 Comments
Comment posted by William Bickle on February 16, 2015 at 8:37 AM
Hello Lon

As mentioned here by others, A Fine Capture!

The whole image with its many areas has a lot to offer for me. The frost and stiff plant life is great to see here? And still short enough to allow the full leg and hoof to be visible. A definite uphill climb with the centre guy leading, Would have been ideal for more separation between them, Like the DOF on leader and well defined eye. You have done well to open up the dark fur areas to show detail. Interesting to see where you used a negative meter compensation in this scene?

Like the Capture!

Bill
Registered on June 13, 2011, 183 Posts, 1702 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on February 16, 2015 at 9:13 AM
Hi Lon,

Nice winter scene - the small amount of snow on the bisons themselves, plus the ice-encrusted snow on the ground, definitely gives an overall frosty feeling to the shot. I have no issue with the DoF or the fact that just the lead bison is in sharp focus.

I am in agreement with Sandra on the slant off the two left-most bison's adding a degree of awkwardness to the shot. A tiny bit more separation between those same two bison might have helped strengthen the shot as well.

On the Tamron lens: I've been testing that same lens for a number of months and don't disagree with you on its versatility. And no one can argue with its value proposition. While I think many will really like the Tamron and it will serve them well, I have decided not to keep mine. My main reason is that I find the AF-S 80-400 VR to be a little more useful focal range for me. Add in that the 80-400 and is even smaller and easier to carry (it fits into a holster system with a pro body attached while the Tamron doesn't) and its better optics...and...well...I just can't really find a reason to keep the 150-600. In my case I have focal lengths between 400 and 600mm covered pretty well, which also factors into my decision to let the Tamron go.

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Watkins on February 16, 2015 at 10:14 AM
Lon,
The lead bison is marvelous, and the others are not to bad either, although I wouldhave preffered no overlap.
DOF in this case a pure fantasy, whatever lens youy used :biggrin:
Great natural image :toast: :toast:
Registered on December 15, 2010, 1537 Posts, 4877 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on February 16, 2015 at 12:10 PM
In response to William's ?, the reason I chose negative exposure compensation is twofold, one to keep as much detail in the frost covered grasses as possible and secondly to not let the relative mass of three bison influence the exposure too much. I guarantee that if you mostly fill a frame with bison body/bodies the meter will be fooled into trying to lighten the scene and overexpose. By shooting raw I can selectively tweak brightness as needed to protect highlights or pull detail from the shadows.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on February 16, 2015 at 5:41 PM
The lead bison is spectacular, agreed a bit of separation would have put it over the top but it's still a sweet image Lon. :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments