Gallery: AvianPosted January 19, 2015185 views14 comments
Brambling. Few and far between this year. Taken at the small woodland pool.
Nikon D200
Sigma 100-300f4
800 ISO
80th second.
70% of frame.
Neat image
Hide
Cheers
JohnR
Comments
14 comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on January 19, 2015 at 9:55 PM
Nicely done, John! The bird has good detail and I like the floating leaves surrounding it.
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Allen Brooks on January 19, 2015 at 10:14 PM
Nice detail in the bird and a great setting. An attractive color palette as well.
Registered on July 27, 2011, 262 Posts, 2597 Comments
Comment posted by John Tobias on January 19, 2015 at 10:24 PM
Nice colors through out with the leaves, water and the bird. A sharp image. Thanks for sharing.
Registered on September 12, 2009, 2120 Posts, 6455 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on January 20, 2015 at 12:00 AM
Wonderful colors and habitat, and fine techs, John.
The species is accidental in Alaska and always a cause for excitement when they appear.
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Gavin on January 20, 2015 at 1:32 AM
A Brambling in the water where they usually are drinking, bathing or both. 1/80th of a second and still very sharp. Very impressive.
Registered on August 14, 2008, 293 Posts, 1250 Comments
Comment posted by John Robinson on January 20, 2015 at 3:54 AM
Thanks all. This one had a particularly dark head but still showing detail in the blacks.
Thanks for looking.
JohnR
Registered on March 2, 2008, 535 Posts, 2453 Comments
Comment posted by Hans Overduin on January 20, 2015 at 2:31 PM
Love them - not many of them here.. Maybe a slightly lower vantage point could have worked even better, but a pleasant image as presented ! Cheers, Hans
Registered on August 31, 2011, 491 Posts, 3807 Comments
Comment posted by John Robinson on January 21, 2015 at 3:36 AM
Thanks Hans I' sitting in 9 inches of water as it is !!
John
Registered on March 2, 2008, 535 Posts, 2453 Comments
Comment posted by Brian Gatlin on January 21, 2015 at 8:23 AM
really nice colors and details, John. I agree that a lower angle would be even better, but it sounds like you'd need a snorkel.
Registered on March 21, 2009, 202 Posts, 4187 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Zablotny on January 22, 2015 at 8:25 PM
Hi John,
Great reward for your effort. I like the pale edges to the feathers and warm fall colors of the entire scene ....................Jim
Registered on January 17, 2004, 705 Posts, 3594 Comments
Comment posted by John Robinson on January 23, 2015 at 4:39 AM
Thanks both
This low angle comes up time and time again. As I say if I go lower and a bird lands at the front of the pool with its back to me and head turned to camera(my favourite pose), then it is roughly at 45% to the camera. Therefore there is much less DOF thanif the camera is where I have it. Depth is hard to get in the dark pool area so I need every bit I can get. Hope that explains it a bit.
Cheers
John
Registered on March 2, 2008, 535 Posts, 2453 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on January 23, 2015 at 6:50 AM
This is a beauty John I really like how the fallen leaves frame the bird. A very pleasing composition.
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments
Comment posted by Rob Drummond on January 24, 2015 at 7:02 AM
Very pretty John - great detail and I love the floating leaves
Registered on November 8, 2003, 617 Posts, 8267 Comments
Comment posted by John Robinson on January 25, 2015 at 12:24 PM
Thanks Ken/Rob- appreciate your comments
JohnR
Registered on March 2, 2008, 535 Posts, 2453 Comments
Comments
14 commentsThe species is accidental in Alaska and always a cause for excitement when they appear.
Thanks for looking.
JohnR
John
Great reward for your effort. I like the pale edges to the feathers and warm fall colors of the entire scene
This low angle comes up time and time again. As I say if I go lower and a bird lands at the front of the pool with its back to me and head turned to camera(my favourite pose), then it is roughly at 45% to the camera. Therefore there is much less DOF thanif the camera is where I have it. Depth is hard to get in the dark pool area so I need every bit I can get. Hope that explains it a bit.
Cheers
John
JohnR