Not the real name of this waterfall, but this view reminds me of the long train on the bride's dress in a royal wedding. This the same place as the last image I posted. I hesitated in posting the whole thing, because it looked like I broke a "rule" in photographing waterfalls. The water on the bottom looks too bright. I decided to post it this way anyway, because the glowing brightness at the bottom is one of the things that impressed me about the scene. What do you think?
Canon 5D Mark III; Canon 24-105mm.
8 sec. @ f/16; ISO 160
Please see the larger version. It is less saturated than this smaller one. (I only submitted one image: the larger one, which looks just like the original on my monitor.)
NOTE: OVER-SATURATION PROBLEM SOLVED. Some of you may remember a side-discussion in my recent posts about a problem I had with images getting over-saturated when I post them. Some commented that they had similar problems, so I thought I should report what I did wrong. I thought it was some complicated color management issue, but it was just a blunder I made in saving images for the Web. When I used the "Save for Web" method in Photoshop to save JPEGs, the "Embed Color Profile" box was not checked. I was confused about whether it should be checked or not. I tried checking it, and it worked! For a side-by side comparison of how this mistake affects images, see
my recent post in the Digital Imaging Forum.
Comments
10 commentspat