Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Doppelgänger
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Doppelgänger

by Richard Sandor

Gallery: AvianPosted November 1, 2014155 views13 comments
While not a true double or alter ego, the mockingbird in the background added interest in what was otherwise empty space. A small, heavily shaded pond near McAllen, Texas was where this was taken.
Shot with a D4 and 500 mm lens, 1/2000, f/5.6, Auto ISO at 320 and -2/3ev. C&C most welcome. Richard

Comments

13 comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on November 1, 2014 at 3:02 PM
The "doppelganger" is more of a distraction imo. Actually, I would prefer the empty space. Others may disagree. :smile:
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Mike Ramy on November 1, 2014 at 3:44 PM
This is a tough one Richard,
The subject bird is well exposed, tack sharp with a sweet environment and nice pose. The BG bird appears very unnatural and has a presence that competes with the subject bird in a negative way. I like this composition but will have to agree with Phil that the empty space would be better.
:cool: Shot either way.
Registered on June 16, 2012, 567 Posts, 2809 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Sandor on November 1, 2014 at 6:01 PM
Phil and Mike: thanks for the cc. It is appreciated. You've got me wondering if the b/g bird is too bright, too out of focus or lends nothing to the photo or all the above. :smile: My take on this photo is that we see lots of excellent work of lone birds and this one struck my fancy because it's a bit different.

Registered on January 12, 2014, 453 Posts, 1625 Comments
Comment posted by Mike Ramy on November 1, 2014 at 10:36 PM
Richard,
My first thoughts were too bright and too OOF. The subject bird appears to be looking at the BG bird with concern which does add interest and makes this a hard choice. The BG bird feels more like a statue than a real bird as presented and that's the main thing that doesn't work IMO.
Registered on June 16, 2012, 567 Posts, 2809 Comments
Comment posted by Hans Overduin on November 2, 2014 at 5:32 AM
The front bird looks excellent, the other one is too much of a distraction to my taste, however it makes for a nice title for your post :wink: . I personally have nothing against (a lot of) empty space in images .. Cheers, Hans
Registered on August 31, 2011, 491 Posts, 3807 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on November 2, 2014 at 8:06 AM
I really like the front bird, details, pose sharpness... I too find the OOF bird in the background a distraction.
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Thompson on November 2, 2014 at 3:48 PM
I have to agree with the other comments regarding the oof bird, but this would be a real solid shot if it were removed. I I like the greens and browns together and the main bird is tack sharp. :smile:
Registered on August 7, 2014, 125 Posts, 2319 Comments
Comment posted by Jefferson Silva on November 2, 2014 at 4:03 PM
The bird in sharp is excellent, and I agree with others about the oof bird as a distraction.
Registered on December 18, 2012, 162 Posts, 975 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Sandor on November 2, 2014 at 8:51 PM
OK OK, I give. :smile: Will still try different things from time to time. Richard
Registered on January 12, 2014, 453 Posts, 1625 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on November 3, 2014 at 11:47 AM
Just wanted to see what it would look like with the OOF bird removed. A quick clone (no promises of precision on this one).

I do think it looks better without it.....
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Sandor on November 3, 2014 at 1:27 PM
Keith: definitely agree. Can you provide any details as to how you did the cloning. I've never done any where near as much. Richard
Registered on January 12, 2014, 453 Posts, 1625 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on November 3, 2014 at 6:28 PM
Can you provide any details as to how you did the cloning. I've never done any where near as much.


Richard: Really nothing special. The uniform black area made it relatively easy to clone out the OOF bird. Just work in smaller areas to build up more black, then bigger clone stamp brushes to make it smoother as space permits. As I said, I didn't take much time and didn't work the boundary between the black background and the transition to the mid ground.
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Watkins on November 3, 2014 at 11:10 PM
Richard,
The OP is certainly very different I am unsure whether it works or not.
The RP looks much better :toast: :toast:
Registered on December 15, 2010, 1537 Posts, 4877 Comments