Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Rainforest Nobility
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Rainforest Nobility

by Brad Hill

Gallery: WildlifePosted July 8, 2014275 views11 comments
Rainforest Nobility

One of my favourites from my late spring Khutzeymateen photo tours. Definitely not dramatic or exciting...but just the kind of shot that works for me (and probably few others :wink: )!

You're sitting right at the top of the food chain. You're sitting high on a rock overlooking a long coastal inlet on one side, and a thick section of temperate rainforest on the other. Your cubs are fed, safely tucked in, and snoozing just below you. What's there to do? Relax, look around with your nose slightly upturned, and convey as much of an air of royal haughtiness that your status as rainforest nobility allows you to. After all, right now you're the self-proclaimed Queen of the Khutzeymateen!

Subject: Female Grizzly (Ursus arctos) laying atop Fucus covered rock on the edge of the forest
Location: Khutzeymateen Inlet, northern Great Bear Rainforest, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D4s
Lens: Nikkor 400mm f2.8 VR. Hand-held from floating zodiac. VR on and in "Active" mode.
Exposure: 1/500s @ f6.3; ISO 1000. -0.33 stop compensation from matrix-metered exposure setting.
Crop: None - this is full frame

More details about the image - including why it works for me, post-processing information and a higher res version of the image - can be found here on my website:

http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/latest/.

Comments and critiques welcomed - probably best to view the larger version prior to doing so!

Cheers...

Brad

Comments

11 comments
Comment posted by Jerry Austin on July 8, 2014 at 6:25 PM
Were are of the same mind on this one. A regal pose and you can see the claws on both the front and back legs. The background is stellar and the green right behind the bear's head and shoulders lets the head stand out. If this sow were following your directions I don't thick you could have gotten a better setup. As always, well done.
Registered on January 6, 2012, 651 Posts, 3448 Comments
Comment posted by Christine Adams on July 8, 2014 at 8:03 PM
Great shot! Certainly does look every bit noble!!
Registered on January 24, 2006, 119 Posts, 1871 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on July 8, 2014 at 8:15 PM
Superb image quality, as always, Brad. I like the pose, but something about the angle just doesn't set right with me. Maybe some more of the rock?

:toast:
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Jerry Austin on July 9, 2014 at 11:05 AM
If my observationa are accurate, I would say that this momma bear is the same bear depicted in "On The Lookout" with the blonde cub. I also think that the blonde cub in "On The Lookout" is the same cub in "Sentience". Am I correct?
Registered on January 6, 2012, 651 Posts, 3448 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on July 9, 2014 at 11:20 AM
Hey Jerry,

You are correct. We had several sets of cubs (and tons of adult bears) to work with on this trip, but the only ones accessible at low tide were these ones (and this Ma had two cubs - the blonde one and the darker one depicted in "Flat Out"). Fortunately they were quite the performers!

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Jerry Austin on July 9, 2014 at 12:01 PM
Brad,

I think everyone would agree that your images are top notch. We are all also familiar with your work flow to achieve these results. However, when I look at some of your posted images, I can't help but wonder what you started with. Would you consider posting an initial image so we could take a look at the before and after? This one might be a good candidate.

Jerry
Registered on January 6, 2012, 651 Posts, 3448 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on July 9, 2014 at 12:12 PM
Hi Jerry,

I'll post an untouched version here either later today or first thing tomorrow (have some deadlines to deal with). One thing to keep in mind - it's pretty much impossible to post a truly "untouched" version - the minute it's in my raw converter (Capture One Pro) there's adjustments made (default tone curve for the camera, in some cases lens profiles applied, etc.), and the same is true if you're using Lightroom or ACR (tho' the images look immensely different when one is looking at "previews" in Capture One Pro than they do in Lightroom or ACR).

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Jerry Austin on July 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM
Thanks, Brad. I realize that "untouched" is a relative term. Look forward to seeing your post.
Registered on January 6, 2012, 651 Posts, 3448 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on July 10, 2014 at 10:12 AM
Wow Brad, the setting just could not be better, picture perfect :smile:
And such a noble creature, you've really done it justice here..
Excellent work :toast:
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on July 10, 2014 at 10:41 AM
Hey Jerry,

As requested - the "rawest" form of the image that can be seen (I think you know what I mean by that). This one is how it looks in Lightroom - NOT Capture One Pro (my reasoning is that there are far more users here of Lightroom than Capture One Pro). A few things to note:

1. As is often the case, Lightroom preview (as seen here) is lacking contrast and saturation. The preview in Capture One Pro (before adjustments made) had more colour (so much so that I had to desaturate the greens and the yellows) and much better contrast.

2. I "shoot to process" - not for in-camera results. I intentionally over-exposed this shot with the thought I would bring the exposure down in processing. I'm not a big proponent of ETTR, but in this case there were lots of subtle tones/hues in the coat of the bear that I wanted to make sure I recorded (in the raw file). Odds are if I backed off the exposure in the field these wouldn't have been lost (in this case), but just playing it safe.

3. In a sense this raw vs. final image comparison isn't too instructive in that I did little with the overall tonal balance (which I do monkey with in many of my images). What I did do was really work on the tonal separation in the coat of the bear (mostly by manually tweaking the mid tones via the exposure blends I performed.

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Jerry Austin on July 10, 2014 at 11:08 AM
Brad,

Thanks for taking the time to do this. It was very informative, as always.

Jerry
Registered on January 6, 2012, 651 Posts, 3448 Comments