Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Spider Lily
‹ PreviousFlora GalleryNext ›

Spider Lily

by Alan LaFaver

Gallery: FloraPosted March 24, 201449 views8 comments
No expert at all here, just an admirer of this flower. Saw this yesterday in Jean Lafitte Nat. Park, Barataria Preserve.

Original version below so you can see what I started with.
Your thoughts?

I just thought it was such an interesting, pretty flower. Wanted to showcase it here.
Adjusted contrast, saturation, levels. Tried to keep whites from blowing out. I sharpened the lily, added NR to surrounding area. Reduced brightness on a few artifacts I thought distracted from the lily. Cloned out the reddish spot just above lily. Cropped to what I thought was good, but I'm open to all suggestions.

D7000, Nikon 70-300mm VR @ 300mm, 1/400, ISO400, f/8. Manual mode. Chose 1/400 to reduce effects of movement/vibration. No tripod, HH, but lens supported on wood rail.

Thanks,
Al

Comments

8 comments
Comment posted by Alan LaFaver on March 24, 2014 at 11:17 AM
Original image, converted straight from RAW @200dpi.
Registered on February 28, 2014, 18 Posts, 147 Comments
Comment posted by Nathan Buck on March 24, 2014 at 12:25 PM
I think your processing here is great Alan - I think you excluded the elements that should have been excluded. I think the bloom is very interesting, but it looks like a tough one to shoot. Nice job showing the character of the bloom.

Nathan
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1101 Posts, 13589 Comments
Comment posted by Allen Brooks on March 24, 2014 at 1:31 PM
You did a nice job in post-processing, creating an aesthetically pleasing composition. :toast:
Registered on July 27, 2011, 262 Posts, 2597 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Cross on March 24, 2014 at 5:16 PM
A great looking flower, Alan. You did a good job getting the image to here. My suggestion would be to do something with that bright veg coming in from the RH side. I would either clone it out or darken it up. It's too bright for this photo and pulls the eye over there.
Registered on April 3, 2010, 271 Posts, 1342 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on March 25, 2014 at 1:16 AM
That is a very interesting looking flower with the stamens all coming from the outside instead of the center of the flower. Good detail in the larger version and I like the contrast, way to go.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by Genny K. on March 26, 2014 at 8:38 PM
Nicely done. The flower itself is exquisite, and you really brought that out in your final image. It's so delicate and you did a good job with color and keeping the detail in the whites.
I'm no expert on doing flora shots, but I sure see some great ones on here. The people who are really good at closeup flowers shots like this have a knack for seeing all the things that SHOULDN'T be there, and doing what they can to remove or minimize them before taking the photo.
Imagine how incredible this flower would look it the flower itself was in fairly bright light, but the rest of the plant, and the other vegetation around it was in darkness. That flower would practically pop out of the image. As the other commenters noted, you already removed or fixed the big things. You've got a really good flower, it's fixing those other distracting things that would make this even more fantastic. I think you could still darken the other parts of the plant that are fairly bright, especially that bright stem going off to the right.
It would have been interesting to see if you could have positioned yourself so that the petals of the flower did NOT intersect with the other vertical parts of the flower. I also wonder if you could crop it more, to really focus on the flower.
Nice one; the large image is a dandy!
Registered on June 5, 2006, 132 Posts, 2001 Comments
Comment posted by Albert Darmo on March 28, 2014 at 3:43 PM
Hi Alan :wavey: I see a great improvement from the original shot.. the processing is very.good. but to me the composition still has too much background.


Albert Darmo.. Canada
Registered on November 25, 2008, 1386 Posts, 11978 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on March 28, 2014 at 5:38 PM
The differences and similarities between this flower and my post are fascinating. The web site I used for ID limited its distribution to Florida, but it's very clear that identifying the different spider lilies at the species level is a huge challenge. In fact, you probably need to be a botanist and have dissected the flower to be certain of the species ID. You've got excellent sharpness on the flower and its long sepals and your processing lets the flower take center stage. It would be nice not to have that second bud touching the frame. One way of dealing with it here would be to significantly burn in that stem. Then it wouldn't attract as much attention.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments