Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
I didn't know.
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

I didn't know.

by Ronald Murphy

Gallery: LandscapePosted November 12, 2013359 views14 comments
I wasn't aware that their undersides were so brightly red. Near sunset at Lake Artemesia Natural Area, Maryland.

I went for a relatively-narrow DOF. Are there any opinions on this?

Canon T3i, 1/25 s, f/10, ISO 400, EF 70-200mm f/2.8 @ 175 mm, CPL

Seeking any and all advice and comments. Thanks in advance.

Please view the large image!

Comments

14 comments
Comment posted by Bob Miller on November 12, 2013 at 10:11 AM
It's nice but seems it needs something? Almost as if this is the background, and we want a frog or bird or something else to be the main object of the photo? I don't know but that's just my feel. :confused:
Registered on January 24, 2005, 152 Posts, 405 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Breitkreuz on November 12, 2013 at 10:16 AM
Ronald, I like this capture a lot. As for the DOF item it works just fine IMO. The center focus with surrounding edges being slightly softer can be viewed both positively and or negatively depending upon ones POV. I find it works OK here.
I guess the large dead leaf is the one item a bit distracting, but not a big negative. You could try a content aware on it for another look to see if it works. :cool:
Registered on February 25, 2006, 525 Posts, 8448 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Cameron on November 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM
I thought they were fish scales initially. I quite like it but I see Bob's point, something to break the pattern would probably make the image stronger still.
Registered on August 6, 2004, 1125 Posts, 3318 Comments
Comment posted by Ronald Murphy on November 12, 2013 at 10:29 AM
Thank you for the comments! I was hoping this would stand alone as an RGB abstract, but a good, fat frog would have made me happier I confess. I certainly thought about cloning out the dead pad, but that seemed to me to go a bit too far. Although I'm definitely not above SOME cloning, let me assure you.
Registered on March 13, 2012, 279 Posts, 975 Comments
Comment posted by Lucy VanSwearingen on November 12, 2013 at 11:16 AM
Just a crazy thought....I'll bet, that if you totally blurred this photo, it would be a wonderful abstract of green and red.............
Registered on May 23, 2009, 800 Posts, 2042 Comments
Comment posted by Vance Gese on November 12, 2013 at 5:12 PM
Love the pattern and the red and green color contrast is really nice. I might consider cropping a wee bit off the bottom to eliminate some of the out of focus leaves and at least part of the dead leaf, but just a suggestion, as this is really nice as is. Well done.
Registered on November 13, 2008, 298 Posts, 6629 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on November 12, 2013 at 5:56 PM
The late light really made the difference here Ronald, great 3D look.
One really has to see the LP, very nice! :toast: :toast:
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on November 12, 2013 at 6:26 PM
This is a neat look at this repeating pattern of leaves and the details show off much better in the larger version. In my opinion, an image like this one needs something (or two or three somethings) that stands out as different from the pattern. You might be able to get that by moving the dead leaf in the lower right corner into one of the power points (intersections of the 1/3 lines) or if you could find a spot where a leaf was missing.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Harry Lichtman on November 12, 2013 at 10:20 PM
The contrasting colors do make an interesting abstract. While the patterns work great as is, I might try to select a section of this to enlarge. The many lilies are pretty busy, so a tighter view might retain the great detail, patterns and textures. I would avoid the dead leaf on the right, so maybe the center left. Nice find.
Registered on September 17, 2010, 304 Posts, 3507 Comments
Comment posted by Russell Colletta on November 13, 2013 at 9:36 AM
Interesting closed composition. It would be a great image to experiment with to create even more abstraction, like softening, or reducing the contrast, or ...
Registered on October 31, 2009, 114 Posts, 1008 Comments
Comment posted by Russell Colletta on November 13, 2013 at 9:36 AM
Interesting closed composition. It would be a great image to experiment with to create even more abstraction, like softening, or reducing the contrast, or ...
Registered on October 31, 2009, 114 Posts, 1008 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on November 13, 2013 at 10:17 AM
I like the whole RGB thing going on here. Red, Green, Blue, and they all work well together with the repeating patterns.
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by John Williams on November 13, 2013 at 6:55 PM
Wonderful patterns! I agree; the red contrasts nicely.
Registered on September 6, 2007, 221 Posts, 5985 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on November 14, 2013 at 9:06 AM
A wonderful arrangement of repeating shapes, Ronald. I also like the RBG colors. Rather than cloning out the dead pad have you considered just cropping it off? That would still leave you plenty of image to work with. Just a suggestion of course.

Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments