Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Rickett's Glen, PA
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Rickett's Glen, PA

by Ronald Murphy

Gallery: LandscapePosted November 4, 2013206 views7 comments
A perfect picnic place, but damp.

Three RAW exposures for DOF hand blended in PS6, processed in LR5, then TK resize/sharpening for web.
Canon T3i, 1/10 s, f/8, ISO 400, EF-S10-22 mm @ 10 mm, CPL

Seeking any and all advice and comments. Thanks in advance.

Please view the large image!

Comments

7 comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on November 4, 2013 at 10:12 AM
That's a neat slab of stone and the stream angling in the background works well and adds a fine sense of depth. I'm torn over the trees at the top, liking the additional context, but wondering if cropping to just above the large rock urc doesn't work better by putting more focus on the slab.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Reid on November 4, 2013 at 11:10 AM
Very interesting rock slab you found Ronald. I like the tones and colors and nice depth to the scene. Well done.
Registered on January 27, 2013, 65 Posts, 2460 Comments
Comment posted by Bob Miller on November 4, 2013 at 12:22 PM
I like the shine coming off the ledge. A question- Is it really necessary to do an image blend with a wide angle that has such a short infinity focus? I think I can get infinity at around 1 foot @ 11mm with my Sigma 10-20.
Registered on January 24, 2005, 152 Posts, 405 Comments
Comment posted by Ronald Murphy on November 4, 2013 at 1:25 PM
Bob - According to my DOF calculator, closest subject for "acceptable" focus with 10 mm @ f/8 is 1.9 feet which, yes, may have covered those nearest leaves, if "acceptable" is acceptable. But for the distribution of subject distances in a scene like this, masking for three distances is so trivial, it's become my standard approach. Also, for this scene I could live with 1/10 s, but, if there had been any wind, a shorter shutter speed would have forced a larger aperture and decreased DOF. Thanks for asking.
Registered on March 13, 2012, 279 Posts, 975 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on November 4, 2013 at 8:27 PM
That is an unusual and cool looking slab of rock, Ronald. I'll have to be on the lookout for it on another visit to the park as I like those graceful curved lines. My only suggestion would be to tone down the hotspots a bit on the right topside of the rock. Looks like you came back with some nice images from your trip.

Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on November 5, 2013 at 10:59 PM
I think the composition works very nicely here Ronald. I do wish for more atmosphere.
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Larry Fischer on November 6, 2013 at 8:11 AM
Great shot.
Color sells.
I would increase either saturation or contrast on the leaves against the grey.
the fisch
Registered on July 28, 2008, 155 Posts, 874 Comments