Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Tranquility
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Tranquility

by Brad Hill

Gallery: WildlifePosted June 10, 2013236 views8 comments
Tranquility

I captured this image during my "Grizzlies of the Khutzeymateen" Instructional Photo Tour in late May. Timing of the tide and participant enthusiasm allowed us to get into the upper reaches of the inlet before the sun was up and the soft mist-softened light turned the entire area into pure eye candy. My "job" as tour leader has positives and negatives - it's absolutely wonderful to visit places like the Khutzeymateen on a regular basis. But while I do shoot images myself on my tours, one of my cardinal rules is that the client's photos come first. One of the on-the-ground consequences of this is that I stay in the back of the Zodiac and "work-around" everyone else. As a result there's no doubt I miss some images.

But, in this case, my "back-of-the-boat" positioning worked in my favour. About one minute before I captured this image the bear was in front of the Zodiac and quietly foraging on grass with a "drop-dead gorgeous-I-don't-believe-what-I'm-seeing" background. Then, the bear abruptly moved around us and gracefully and smoothly entered the calm high-tide waters right behind the Zodiac! I instantly dropped as low as possible - both to get the heck out of the way and to get as low an angle as possible to shoot the scene from. And this is the result. Thank you Mr. Bear!

I got lucky on this shot in at least one other way. During this year's tours I was shooting Nikon's "new" AF-S 80-400mm f4.5-5.6 VR lens (I often shoot primarily with primes in the Khutzeymateen). And, I happened to have the 80-400mm mounted on my D4 when this scene unfolded. This bear was close, so I instantly zoomed all the way back to 80mm and captured a sequence of the entire scene - from the bear entering the water through to swimming to the opposite side of the channel. This one - where the bear's rear end is just clearing the dark green reflection line - is one of my favourites of the lot. To me it conveys the tranquility and peacefulness we all experienced that memorable morning. And it's just SO Khutzeymateen!

Subject: Male Grizzly Bear (Urus arctos) taking a dip before sunrise
Location:Khutzeymateen Inlet, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D4
Lens: Nikkor AF-S 80-400mm f4.5-5.6 VR zoom @ 80mm - hand-held from floating zodiac. VR on and in "Active" mode.
Exposure: 1/320s @ f7.1; ISO 800. -0.33 compensation compensation from matrix-metered exposure setting.
Crop: Extremely minor - Just a few pixels cropped from bottom

Like almost always, additional details about the image (including processing details and more) is available here:

http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/latest/.

Comments and critiques welcomed - probably best to view the larger version prior to doing so!

Cheers...

Brad

Comments

8 comments
Comment posted by Max Waugh on June 10, 2013 at 12:03 PM
Thanks to the background haze, it looks like a completely different environment. For all I know this bear could've been crossing a watery stretch in the Okavango. :wink: I like the departure from the usual wet forested environment.

Max
Registered on September 26, 2008, 428 Posts, 2329 Comments
Comment posted by Bob Decker on June 10, 2013 at 9:07 PM
This is a really enjoyable image. I like the composition and the conditions and setting is just wonderful for this shot.
Registered on April 28, 2011, 14 Posts, 40 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on June 11, 2013 at 1:48 AM
Hello Brad. I spent a few years working on the water in that part of the world and I recall the special feeling you refer to. The sound, light and even the smells are quite unforgettable. The fog always creeped me out though, too easy to loose your bearings, but that's another story.

I really like the lush detail in the sedge on the left side and the sweeping arc of the waterway. The larger view shows adequate detail on the bear. A couple of technical items struck me. What passes as a horizon here seems tilted to the right about 2 degrees, easy to happen from the back of a zodiac. Easy fix, if in fact there really is a rotation? The other point is the irregular angularity of the brightest area in the foggy background above the bear's head. Might be an artifact from jpeg compression for uploading here?

I viewed this photo this morning and it has been on my mind all day, it's 11:46 pm now. A photo that has the ability to get under the viewers skin like that must be hitting the right notes. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Watkins on June 11, 2013 at 2:59 AM
Brad,
A very tranquil image, whilst I know there must have been little light, I wonder if the image could just do with a little lift in light.
Like Gary I wonder what has caused the strange patterns in the central sky, if they are in the RAW I would definitely try to make them disappear.
Looks like you have two bears in this picture?
Registered on December 15, 2010, 1537 Posts, 4877 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on June 11, 2013 at 7:44 AM
hey Gary and Ken,

I was wondering if someone would point out the white "blotches" in the "sky". What you're looking at there is the toe of an avalanche slope on the background mountain - and the remaining pile of snow. So definitely not an artifact. Still uber-easy to remove on a background like that, but once it's a concrete element of the scene (rather than an artifact, removing it enters different terrain for me (ethics-wise). And, if you look closely, those snow patches produce a faint reflection on the calm water - a vertical line that leads STRAIGHT to the bear's head. So, if remove the snow, you also have to remove the reflection (otherwise the reflection makes no sense). Again, easy to do, but if I do then I'm at the point of "patching" up a lot of the image (and while I'm not certain I like the snow, I do like the reflection it produces).

Gary - glad to give you an "eye-worm"! Oh...on the apparent tilt - that horizon you're gauging by isn't flat - a 2 degree rotation to level that would have the bear swimming uphill (which I think is more of a problem - even to the laws of physics - than a tricky shoreline! :wink: ). The reflection of the darned snow pile (i.e., exactly vertical) also confirms the image is level. But I definitely understand how the optical illusion on the shoreline could produce that impression.

Cheers and thanks guys...will be interesting to see how others react to the snow...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Watkins on June 11, 2013 at 8:06 AM
Brad,

I would never have known that the BG was in fact mountains, I imagined it to be an overcast sky :confused:
Registered on December 15, 2010, 1537 Posts, 4877 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on June 11, 2013 at 8:27 AM
Hey Ken,

I would have thought the trees on the right climbing the slope would have been a giveaway! :wink: This image is REALLY dependent on the brightness of the host monitor/display, which makes it a dicey one to post. On my laptop (not at brightest setting) I can see the lighter green grass around the snow (at the toe of the avalanche slope) and even individual trees on the slope, but this doesn't mean that others see the same thing (due to monitor brightness). Regardless, I totally understand your point about the snow being distracting and the minute one has to explain an image for others to "see it" then it has lost some effectiveness. In a perfect world the snow wouldn't have been there and none of this would have come up...

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Steeve Marcoux on June 13, 2013 at 12:32 PM
I like it a lot, that's the kind of atmosphere that made a shot memorable.
Registered on November 23, 2012, 15 Posts, 76 Comments