Twinkle Tufas
by Peter Coskun
I've been playing with this image for quite a while, mostly because I am heading back to the area and am trying to get ideas on new images. This is a blend of two images taken a few hours apart. I wanted some stars in the image mixed with the clouds that lingered on the horizon and was hoping to get it in one shot, but the sky cleared up after sunset and there were no clouds. So I stuck around and fired off some night shots to blend into this frame. I liked the overall scene, though not 100% on the comp. Does it work for you? Comments and critiques are greatly appreciated.
Canon 7d
Canon 17-40mm @17mm
Base image-f16 1/10th sec ISO 100
Stars- f4 30 sec ISO 3200
Tripod
Comments
14 commentsNick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
On the other hand, the wide angle distortion is fairly noticeable to me and a bit distracting...I don't always mind it, but here the shadows of the tufas give it away and the tufas themselves seem to be leaning toward the edges of the frame. Also, I agree with Eva on the shadow touching the rock, but I like the camera angle you chose overall. Isolating the tufas against the sky is important to the success of the shot.
If you intend to do more night shots like this, you may want to try renting the 24mm 1.4L. I've used it a couple of times and I know some folks think it's the best lens Canon offers for night shots of the milky way, etc. It's pretty darn sharp from f/2.8 through f/16, and getting a one-stop (or greater) advantage for nighttime shots over your 17-40 might be well worth it. Plus sharper corners aren't bad either.
Phil, I'm planning on getting a new lens soon for my night photography, and right now it seems that it is between the Rokinon 14mm 2.8 and Tokina 11-16 2.8. We shall see what I end up with. Don't want to spend too much especially considering I hear lots of great things about both lenses.
Thanks Stan. I'm gonna try to reprocess it and work the few kinks out. Hopefully it will look nice for print.
(P.S. it should not account for your pet peeve of large rocks in the foreground since this technically isn't a rock, but I'll just accept the fact you like it lol)
Having said that, I would consider a slight saturation drop in the blue in the upper sky and maybe a lowering of the opacity of the stars so they look more natural, less put in. That is just me, others may not agree. But as is it still certainly works.