Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Surgerunner +Update
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Surgerunner +Update

by Alex Noriega

Gallery: LandscapePosted January 26, 2013602 views19 comments
Receding waves on the sandstone formations of Oregon's Cape Kiwanda at twilight. Larger version on a dark background at the Purchase Print link. Scroll down to see the web sharpening on the stars removed.

Three exposures -

Landscape+water: 2 seconds, f/11, ISO 100
Sky (for dynamic range): 1/2 sec, f/11, ISO 100
Stars (1/2 hour later): 30 sec, f/4, ISO 1600

Canon 40D, Sigma 10-20mm

Before anyone says anything about the sky color, check out this informative screenshot of one of my RAWs that I hastily put together, which I believe is justification/exemplification of my approach to lingering post-sunset color in my twilight images: check it out here.

That having been said, I could probably push the yellow/orange area of the sky more toward red/magenta, and darken it a bit further.. but meh. The main thing to keep in mind is that the warm/cool division in the sky is NOT where I blended two exposures - the white dots of the stars were merely overlaid via the Floris Van Breugel lighten-blend-mode method. The sky color is natural, and indeed occurred after stars had already appeared over my head.

I'd also like to discuss (read: talk at you about) the exposure time in relation to the darkness of the scene. I couldn't give up that water texture in the FG, or the wave, both of which were captured in the same 2-second exposure. I had some foggy 30 second exposures and they're really just nowhere near as interesting. The thing is, when you're there and night is falling, you don't see long exposures with your eyes - you can still see the waves approaching and crashing and receding. I wanted to convey that. It's really only photographers that get put off by the water not being a longer exposure, since photographers know that you generally need longer exposures at that time of the evening. Not a matter of realism though, since you can totally see the action yourself at the scene. Just imagine I had a D800 and shot it at ISO 1600-6400 to freeze the water action later in the evening with acceptable quality, instead of a 40D that forces blending exposures for results like this because it's unacceptable at those ISOs. :smile:

Comments

19 comments
Comment posted by Zack Clothier on January 26, 2013 at 9:58 AM
Alex, I like the image, seems pretty well crafted as far as the blending goes. The only nit I have is with the "glow" on the right side of the stack, seems a bit strong, especially in the larger version. The comp is very nice and I love how the wave action pulls you right in.

Your link appears to be broken.. :wavey:
Registered on January 28, 2010, 343 Posts, 2257 Comments
Comment posted by Alex Noriega on January 26, 2013 at 10:20 AM
Thanks, Zack. Fixed the link - NPN was removing part of the link because it had i-m-g in it, so I just hosted it on my own server.

The glow/warmth is significantly toned down and cooled down from the raw sky exposure, which was taken as stars were appearing overhead. Perhaps I should push the orangeish tones more toward magenta/red and darken that area, but these are basically untouched colors other than the overall white balance. No added glow or color in that area.

That's kind of why I posted that link that ended up breaking - to demonstrate that, in fact, there can be a ridiculous amount of post-sunset color/light left in the sky as the stars appear. :smile:
Registered on May 19, 2012, 80 Posts, 195 Comments
Comment posted by Zack Clothier on January 26, 2013 at 10:36 AM
I too have seen this afterglow as I like to call it, long after the sun has gone down..thanks for posting the link
Registered on January 28, 2010, 343 Posts, 2257 Comments
Comment posted by Cristina Strudthof on January 26, 2013 at 10:46 AM
Your composition is amazing. Everything working together to point the viewer further into the shot. I'm loving your twilight shots so keep them coming.
Registered on January 14, 2011, 53 Posts, 363 Comments
Comment posted by Alex Noriega on January 26, 2013 at 10:52 AM
Thanks Cristina - credit for the composition should go to Ryan Dyar, who I believe said it originally came from Chip Phillips. Hard to unsee those things if you've never shot it before seeing everyone else's work there, plus there's not much else in the way of horizontals from in this sandstone bowl. I had my own original vertical comp worked out last year that I never posted, but the waves would have pulled me away this time if I'd tried that one with the tide this high.. :smile:
Registered on May 19, 2012, 80 Posts, 195 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Anderson on January 26, 2013 at 11:43 AM
Alex, well done.
Beautiful image and well crafted.
:toast:
Registered on September 6, 2007, 346 Posts, 2696 Comments
Comment posted by Brian Schrayer on January 26, 2013 at 11:44 AM
Beautiful work, Alex. Nothing to criticize here. Well presented and executed!!
Registered on May 28, 2004, 114 Posts, 2890 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Coskun on January 26, 2013 at 12:02 PM
Another great blend Alex. The texture in the water and the overall color balance is very nice. The stars just add to the image.
Registered on October 31, 2011, 170 Posts, 1240 Comments
Comment posted by Oleg Kuchorenko on January 26, 2013 at 2:40 PM
It looks incredible, you able get the max quality from night photography as it possible, all your works looks original and interesting for studying..
Registered on July 2, 2012, 9 Posts, 111 Comments
Comment posted by Aaron Feinberg on January 26, 2013 at 6:18 PM
You're on fire man. Too epic. Still havent been able to pull this off. Great work.

aF
Registered on October 26, 2009, 399 Posts, 2789 Comments
Comment posted by Joseph Campisi on January 26, 2013 at 11:51 PM
Love it Alex! The blend looks very natural to me, and the stars top it off. I really like the exposure for the water as well. Nice dynamic sense of movement there. Great image! :toast:
Registered on November 24, 2008, 304 Posts, 3211 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on January 27, 2013 at 12:16 AM
It's a beautiful image, Alex. You handled everything perfectly.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Jack Maloney on January 27, 2013 at 1:23 AM
I've stood on this very spot many times. This image does it justice! Very well done!!! :toast:
Registered on November 5, 2004, 5 Posts, 20 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Chamberlain on January 27, 2013 at 3:07 PM
Alex, the foreground is very nice and dramatic, but there's something about the stars that just doesn't look right to me. It doesn't seem like the stars would be that bright and vivid at this time of day and they almost seem like they should be smaller since this was shot with a wide angle lens. I know you said the stars are from an exposure 1/2 hour later. Maybe that's why they seem brighter than what they should be. I understand your techniques of post processing, but I just think this image may do better without the stars. Other than that, this is a great photo.
Registered on January 6, 2013, 12 Posts, 44 Comments
Comment posted by Alex Noriega on January 27, 2013 at 9:33 PM
The web sharpening made them more pronounced in this 700px version than I intended in the large version. Here it is with the web sharpening masked out, Dennis. I still think they could be smaller and dimmer, and not come as close to the horizon/color. I'll have to re-do them before printing.
Registered on May 19, 2012, 80 Posts, 195 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Chamberlain on January 27, 2013 at 9:46 PM
Thanks for the explanation Alex. I think the stars look more natural in this one.
Registered on January 6, 2013, 12 Posts, 44 Comments
Comment posted by Abdullaziz Bin Ali on January 28, 2013 at 6:03 AM
I really love this
Registered on May 31, 2009, 112 Posts, 1590 Comments
Comment posted by John Mumaw on January 28, 2013 at 7:06 PM
Oh, that's much better, Alex!
Registered on September 9, 2005, 62 Posts, 2289 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Gasior on January 28, 2013 at 7:45 PM
Beautiful image .Great work :wavey:
Registered on March 7, 2010, 99 Posts, 502 Comments