Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Delicate summer
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Delicate summer

by Peter Coskun

Gallery: LandscapePosted April 25, 2012213 views11 comments
I'm in a bit of a slump right now and haven't shot anything in almost a month. I'm really hoping that will change over the next few months as I have began to plan some summer trips. In the meantime, here is one from last years trip to Moab of delicate arch. I know, it is so often photographed that it sometimes loses it's appeal. However, I wanted to see it just to get my shot of it. When we got to the parking lot, it was almost full and when I found the lone empty spot, it was declared full. I enjoyed the hike up as there are plenty of nice views. I just didn't enjoy bringing my heavy pack and the heavy winds that seemed to push me down. Once at the top overlooking the arch my friend and I decided to take shelter as it began to rain pretty hard. Mix that with 50+ mph winds and I had almost no hope of getting a shot. We decided to wait it out and have a few snacks as many people began to left. Finally the rain stopped and we moved to a new spot to set up our shots. Once we had everything ready to go we had to wait almost two hours until the arch was unobstructed with people. There was a german gentlemen sitting beside us screaming at every person who trotted under the arch. It was amusing and made the hike up a little more worth it. Apparently we had taken the best spot, because every person with a camera huddled around us. The sun was starting to get lower and more people ended up showing up. I was really starting to believe I would have to clone people out when I got back home. Alas, a window of opportunity was given as the arch was unobstructed for nearly two whole minutes. During that two minutes the clouds began to break apart and the sun had lit up the arch perfectly. Getting clouds during this trip was a hassle, so I was pretty thankful for the way they showed behind the arch and over the mountains. After the two minutes we contemplated on staying til the sun officially set (about 45 min til) or get to a new location. We stayed a few more minutes until a group of teens/young adults about our age trotted beneath the arch and began hula-hooping and mooning those trying to photograph the arch. We had enough and raced back to my car and headed to the windows, unsuccessfully getting a shot worthwhile. I'm happy with this even though it's cliche, but I'd like to hear your thoughts. Anything to improve?

Canon 7d
Canon 17-40mm @ 40mm
ISO 100
f22
1/40 sec
Tripod

Comments

11 comments
Comment posted by Richard Hartmann on April 26, 2012 at 12:08 AM
Nice conditions you have with this classic shot. Indeed the colors and sky are nice and the snow capped peaks are a plus. 40MM seems just about right for this subject. It seems like you have nice layers of color from front to back.

The bright light works well.

Too bad about the screaming photographer, especially in the digital age…..
You should have shot the moons and offered to email them the pix.
Registered on January 15, 2009, 13 Posts, 772 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Turner on April 26, 2012 at 10:27 AM
Love it. :jump:
Registered on February 18, 2012, 534 Posts, 2755 Comments
Comment posted by Michael J Greene, on April 26, 2012 at 12:39 PM
Wow - you had fantastic conditions Peter. This really looks nice. The top left portion of the arch looks a little over sharpened. Other than that, I think you really did a terrific job. :toast: :wavey: :cool:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 86 Posts, 2317 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Coskun on April 26, 2012 at 12:55 PM
Thanks everyone. Michael I think there is some web compression going on here that is making it appear over sharpened. I applied the sharpening to the entire image rather than selectively sharpening the arch.
Registered on October 31, 2011, 170 Posts, 1240 Comments
Comment posted by Harry Lichtman on April 26, 2012 at 2:04 PM
Peter - Try a B&W conversion if you haven't yet. I think the sky and varied tones might make this a bit more unique. It's a classic for a reason.
Registered on September 17, 2010, 304 Posts, 3507 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Coskun on April 26, 2012 at 4:35 PM
Thanks Harry, I do have a b&w conversion here
Registered on October 31, 2011, 170 Posts, 1240 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Westerbeck on April 26, 2012 at 5:42 PM
I like both versions, but I think I am more drawn to the B&W version. Very nice on both though...
Registered on March 21, 2012, 32 Posts, 111 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on April 26, 2012 at 10:17 PM
Post-card perfect, Peter. It's a very fine image and the clouds and color contrasts make it very appealing. What a great story about visiting the arch. Hula-hoopers and moonsters. Amazing what photographers attract.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Coskun on April 26, 2012 at 10:31 PM
Thanks Michael and Tony. I suppose this is as good as a postcard I'll ever get. I try to avoid the cliche, but just had to get this icon. I wish the storm would have lasted a bit longer to keep the crowds down, and perhaps give a better light show later on, but I won't complain. I felt bad for some of the other photographers who had set up their large format cameras and never even took a frame...
Registered on October 31, 2011, 170 Posts, 1240 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Teller on April 27, 2012 at 12:08 PM
I sat in the same place you took this image from and had the same experience, less the hula hoops and moons. No clouds for me, only a nice bright blue sky. Nice image and composition. This is always a great place to shot and never a waste of time. I turned my camera, with a wide angle lens on all the people with cameras set up and named the image the "Delicate Arch Paparazzi." Everyone always gets a good chuckle out of it.
Registered on August 23, 2010, 1162 Posts, 6692 Comments
Comment posted by Kartik Venkatarama on April 27, 2012 at 12:30 PM
Great conditions, and while a cliche, always a pretty sight. I do think the contrast in the foreground could be bumped up. If I were to guess, it looks like you did some shadow recovery in the foreground? It has what is usually a tell-tale "flatness" to it. Easily fixed though, and great image anyway
Registered on July 27, 2007, 197 Posts, 830 Comments