Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
About that tail...
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

About that tail...

by Morkel Erasmus

Gallery: WildlifePosted December 21, 2011274 views12 comments
I am curious to have your thoughts here, and maybe I'll open up a can of worms...? :eek:

Early one morning in the Kgalagadi I came across 2 young male cheetahs. They were initially quite far but suddenly moved closer and I didn't have time to take the teleconverter off my lens. The light was sweet so I just tried to roll with it. Here I framed vertically to try and get him in the frame as it was just too tight at the top and bottom for a horizontal shot. I ended up clipping the tail-tip...a big "no-no" in traditional image critique.

That being said, I've browsed through some "high-end" local corporate calendars containing wildlife imagery of late, and in many images they've used feet or tails are "clipped"...


What would you say? Can it, or keep it?
:biggrin:

Techs:
Nikon D3s with Nikkor 500mm f4 VR-II + 1.4xTC @ 700mm
f5.6 @ 1/640 SS @ ISO-400
Full frame image

Comments

12 comments
Comment posted by William Bickle on December 21, 2011 at 4:16 PM
Hello Morkel

You can't be serious to consider canning it? Amazing Light makes this a Very Powerful Image. Sharp expressive eye & Catchlight. Maybe a little Tight but Very Pleasing Image.

Would be happy to have in my Gallery.

Like to see Large Image? Thanks for sharing!

Bill
Registered on June 13, 2011, 183 Posts, 1702 Comments
Comment posted by Ajit Huilgol on December 22, 2011 at 2:15 AM
I would keep this for the fantastic lighting alone. Pity about the clipped tail, but the rest of the subject and the already alluded to light more than make up for that tiny blip. Now, how about a larger image?
Registered on December 19, 2008, 302 Posts, 2055 Comments
Comment posted by William Bickle on December 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM
Hello Morkel

Another Comment..... Just can not get enough of this Stunning Light & Beautiful subject.

VERY POWERFUL Image !!!!! Thanks for sharing .

Bill
Registered on June 13, 2011, 183 Posts, 1702 Comments
Comment posted by Cam Held on December 22, 2011 at 11:27 AM
In my opinion the lighting and pose more than make up for the clipped tail! Great shot! :toast:
-Cam
Registered on November 12, 2009, 59 Posts, 398 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on December 23, 2011 at 2:50 PM
Bummer about the clipped tail. But the light and body position are very attractive. This photo has all kinds of publishing potential IMO :biggrin: Great Photo Morkel!

Ken Archer
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments
Comment posted by Joe James on December 23, 2011 at 9:36 PM
Definitely a KEEP on this one Morkel. The lighting and intense gaze in the Cheetah's eye make the shot, tail clip or no tail clip.
Registered on November 20, 2009, 89 Posts, 808 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Bunch on December 23, 2011 at 11:03 PM
I would say it is a definite keeper. Personally I wouldn't even think of of junking a really nice photo for something so insignificant as clippping a bit of tail. I think there are way too many critique "rules" in nature photography and from time to time it is just fine to break with tradition or the "rules".
Registered on May 18, 2004, 124 Posts, 2503 Comments
Comment posted by Neal Cooper on December 24, 2011 at 3:05 AM
Morkel. Stunning image in great light. I am one for having the whole animal in unless it is a specific head or other body shot. Its all a matter of taste. I would still keep it.
Registered on June 3, 2009, 144 Posts, 306 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on December 24, 2011 at 2:37 PM
Remember the NPN critique galleries are photographers suggesting improvements to photographers! It is a standard well beyond what is required for publication and appreciation by the rest of the public. This is terrific light and terrific expression. Would one prefer to have no out-of-focus foreground and for the tail to be curling into the frame? Of course. Still this is excellent and a real "keeper." ...but you already knew that! :wink:
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on December 24, 2011 at 6:09 PM
Undoubtedly a wonderful image Mokel, the light is stunning. The color of the eyes really grabs me as well. I'm old school and prefer to see the entire tail. I would keep the image for it's other strengths, unless I had a bunch of similar images with the entire tail.
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Morkel Erasmus on December 27, 2011 at 1:28 PM
Thanks for the thoughtful comments and discussion, everyone... :smile:
I would never really "can" this one, as I agree the light and subject are great. I was just really frustrated with myself for cutting this one off... :eek:

And I agree, we tend to be harder on ourselves and on each others' work than the majority of people would be who get to "view" this image. :biggrin:
Registered on March 22, 2011, 385 Posts, 2068 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on December 28, 2011 at 10:21 AM
I would of course keep it Morkel. I don't think people should be influenced to much by these critiques on what is or isn't a good photograph. I think the comments on here are a good starting point of things to consider when making an image, but think a lot of people take them too much as a rule of things when they are really more thoughts and ideas. For me, I use the feedback form this site to give me new or additional things to think about. I used to use a lot of it learn when I was new, but then found myself turing into a clone of every other photographer and feel I lost my personal approach and feel to creating images. I actually started a topic about this very thing in the RMNP Forum and had found many others were actually feeling the same way. it might be a good idea to read it...many people commented on it.

Actually this is one of the reasons, I haven't posted much lately...I felt I needed to find myself in my images again and not be so influenced. So, I guess for me, the question does open a can of worms in a sense. :biggrin:
Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments