Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Elowah Falls REPOST
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Elowah Falls REPOST

by Raymond Klassen

Gallery: LandscapePosted November 21, 2011394 views17 comments
I haven't been posting recently, since I've been trying to improve my PS skills. This is from my trip to Oregon in spring with Mark Metternich. This is a 2 shot blend for exposure. Any suggestions for improvement would be appreciated, since I haven't done a lot of blending yet.

D300s, 18-70mm at 18mm
f/16, ISO 200, 2 sec. and 5 sec. shutter speeds

Thanks for looking!

Comments

17 comments
Comment posted by Andy Richards on November 21, 2011 at 6:23 PM
Really, really difficult exposure situation. Looks like you were dealing with very high contrast between the brighly lit "background" falls and the foreground. Its always difficult to tell from monitor to monitor, and mine here at work hasn't been recently calibrated. So my comment may not be worth much. But it appears to me that the upper right quadrant of the photo is still a bit bright for my taste. Maybe some additional work with blending. Unless you were going for a "high key" look in that part of the image. I don't do a lot of blending myself, so cannot suggest how to do it differently. I have used the photomatix HDR software to do most of my blending work lately.

I like the composition a lot. Nicely balanced with the long, single flow on the top and the two shorter ones in the foreground. There are a couple sub-compositions in this shot, and you have successfully brought them together in one image, in my view.
Registered on November 7, 2010, 37 Posts, 114 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on November 21, 2011 at 7:45 PM
Mainly running a graduated adjustment from the top down to reduce the top luminosity. Then some advanced sharpening techniques. Still for jumping in and giving it a go, good job Raymond. Now get your internet working faster so we can do those Skype lessons!!! :biggrin:
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Raymond Klassen on November 21, 2011 at 7:49 PM
Thanks for the suggestions Andy. Yeah I guess the background is a bit too bright. Mark, thanks for the ideas, and yes, I really want to continue when my net improves!
Registered on November 30, 2008, 114 Posts, 790 Comments
Comment posted by Harry Lichtman on November 21, 2011 at 9:20 PM
Raymond - I do like the arrangement of the falls in the image. I might suggest cropping a little of the top to eliminate the bright spot at the top. In the future, you may want to try some slower shutter speeds for the falls to blend in. I'm from the camp that some detail in the water better represents the flow and motion of the water but you may prefer the milky rendition. Just changing ISO and maintaining the same exposure can give you a great variety of choices while keeping the desired DOF. I didn't see that you used a polarizing filter, which might help as well. :toast:
Registered on September 17, 2010, 304 Posts, 3507 Comments
Comment posted by Art Escobado on November 21, 2011 at 9:22 PM
very nice i like! :toast:
Registered on January 7, 2007, 0 Posts, 775 Comments
Comment posted by Raymond Klassen on November 21, 2011 at 9:35 PM
Harry, I did forget to mention filters. I believe I was using a polarizer on this shot.
Registered on November 30, 2008, 114 Posts, 790 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Chamberlain on November 21, 2011 at 11:33 PM
I've never attempted a blend that worked so I can't really comment on that. My only issues are that it could use some web sharpening, and the background could be darkened slightly and a little more contrast. I like your composition of this, my favorite waterefall in the gorge.

Chris
Registered on March 13, 2007, 500 Posts, 8365 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on November 21, 2011 at 11:40 PM
Maybe we can do this as a "before and after lessons." :biggrin:
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Raymond Klassen on November 22, 2011 at 12:02 AM
Had I known that Mark I could have made the "before" shot look even worse. :wink:
Registered on November 30, 2008, 114 Posts, 790 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on November 22, 2011 at 2:49 PM
I like the comp and light. Could maybe see trying to balance out the light and dark areas a bit.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel & Loana on November 22, 2011 at 5:08 PM
I like the composition and the timing a lot.

Very well seen.

D&L
Registered on October 7, 2008, 166 Posts, 3044 Comments
Comment posted by Rodrigo Sandoval on November 22, 2011 at 5:26 PM
Raymond,
I love well-done waterfall pictures such as this. I think you chose a perfect three point composition.
As for the blending, certainly you managed a great tone rendition, but I think a 3 (darker) additional exposure would have gotten the upper waterfall just perfectly. Anyway, nice work!
Registered on April 4, 2009, 13 Posts, 254 Comments
Comment posted by Danny Laureys on November 22, 2011 at 7:21 PM
Very good composition, top should be darker, could be painted in. overall I really like this.
Registered on January 5, 2008, 590 Posts, 1261 Comments
Comment posted by Raymond Klassen on November 22, 2011 at 8:04 PM
Thanks everyone for the advice! I took your suggestions and did a quick rework. Hope this improves it some.
Registered on November 30, 2008, 114 Posts, 790 Comments
Comment posted by Simon Evans on November 23, 2011 at 4:16 AM
I am reasonably new here and learning as I go. However I find this a very visually pleasing shot and to my untrained eye would not have known it was two shots merged etc. For me a very pleasing photo, one that even though running water is the feature, conveys peace and calmness. Simon
Registered on October 1, 2011, 11 Posts, 23 Comments
Comment posted by Ben Horne on November 25, 2011 at 7:39 PM
I really like what you've done with the top part of your rework. It has restored some contrast, which is nice. I am curious why the main waterfall is darker in the middle than it is on the edges. Was this the result of blending in some more detail in the water? If so, I don't think it's really necessary unless the area surrounding the waterfall was darker. With this exposure, I would expect the water to register equally bright throughout the waterfall. With a long exposure, I really wouldn't expect to see much detail.
Registered on August 27, 2009, 51 Posts, 959 Comments
Comment posted by Raymond Klassen on November 25, 2011 at 8:54 PM
Thanks Ben. The dark middle in the waterfall is natural. I'm guessing there's a separation at the top of the falls that causes less water to fall down the middle, because it is visible on all the shots I got.
Registered on November 30, 2008, 114 Posts, 790 Comments