Green Visions
by Marc Adamus
For the past three weeks I have had the pleasure of leading a photo trip to the far north high in the mountains of the Yukon. Along on this mini-expedition to one of the continent's most impressive ranges were two NPN photographer friends of mine, James and Colin.
We had a tremendous time out there, with the best shows of northern lights coming the first four nights of the trip and one more a little later on. Weather was not terribly cold yet and we were very lucky to have found open water along some of the lakes mixed with interesting shapes in the ice.
All of our photography was focused on complicated renditions that showed off this amazing landscape as much as it did the Aurora. I personally have seven or eight Aurora shots from which I cannot pick a favorite. This was one of them. Please read below:
Processing: This is a blend of more than 10 images aimed at solving a variety of technical problems and getting the view I wanted. First I took the landscape AND aurora you see here with THREE horizontal 14mm stacked and stiched vertically, for a nearly 180-degree field of view (that peak was way too close, and absolutely enormous). I took the mid-ground and aurora sky one after another at 10 seconds, as I couldn't afford loosing the faint reflections in the water. I then proceeded to work the foreground ice, which was picking up a diffused green glow from all around. I would have obviously preferred one exposure here but that wasn't even close to within the technical capacity of the camera. Instead, I used about 10 consecutive bracketed shots for DOF throughout, all at f/5.6, ISO 1600, 45 seconds.....so it took another 10 minutes to render the exposures needed for the foreground. Fortunately, the aurora was going throughout all the exposures so there weren't any major color or tonal variances throughout my exposing for the foreground ice.
Once in PS, I blended all images for DOF first. After that, I stitched the three 14mm images vertically, which overlapped about one third. When this was complete, I dodge/burned here and there for the final result.
All color everywhere in the image comes from RAW only, and it was all GREEN! I thought about removing some green in the landscape itself but it didn't look natural. I just have to consider the fact that everything here (snow and ice) reflects light well, and the only light source there was, was neon green! Therefore, I think the color rendition is accurate enough.
1Ds III, Nikon 14-24. Large version included.
Thanks for your comments,
Marc
Comments
96 commentsThe foreground is wonderful too ..
Wow
Wow
There is one thing about this image that catches my eye though. And I made this assumption before reading your full tech details so take my observation at that. Upon reading the full tech, I'm slightly confused as to the blend between sky and mountain. Not sure if you meant you took a shot for the sky and mountain and blended them or just the mountain and sky together. My initial impression was that it is bordering on a composite look between the actual sky and mountain/horizon line. The only reason I am noticing this is I have done quite a bit of actual composite work for other projects (not necessarily landscape related), and the sharp lines seen here seemed to be a result of a hard blend. Sometimes to counter this I would take a brush somewhere between a hard line and soft line to give it a more blended appearance...that or feather it just slightly.
But then I've never worked with the lens you are using so take what I said with that in mind. I could be completely off base here. Might just be a tack sharp image in every way.
Regardless, the effort you put into this photograph and the trip in general is pretty awesome. Congrats!
Here's one taking into account the edge work you were mentioning.
Again, killer stuff man. You've motivated me to get my ass out into the wild this winter.
I hope to post my first image later today, this will take some time!!
Perfect composition, with the most unique foreground. This picture would work even without an Aurora. ('course with some stunning light)
One thing which surprise me most, (beside all the technical difficulties) is the angle of view, that you used 3 horizontal 14mm shots for it. I couldn't have guessed. It doesn't have that strong wide angle feeling.
I can't add any thing
I'm amazed with what i'm watching here
Again, superb work!
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Brilliant work my friend! You should have called it green with envy! Wow, would I like to see and capture such a scene. The only super minor thing is what seems to be a very slight inconsistency of color at the very bottom of the main peak. Just above the water line on the most prominent slope of snow there appears to be a slight magenta coloration which just seems out of place. I only mention it because it may become more noticeable in a large print.
As well is the anyway to get a tiny bit more detail out of the what appears to be black mid ground rocks?
Please take these as extremely subtle critiques, that in no way take away from what is one of the most spectacular images I have seen.
Awesome work!
Shane
aF
PS that ice does not look thick enough to stand on? deceiving?
This is one of the coolest photos ive ever seen, and definitely one of your all time best. You just can't beat the combo of elements here, and you captured them all masterfully!
Now if this werent the coolest shot ever, id stop there, but i have to add that it still has the one drawback that virtually all night shots of this type have--the peaks has that slight cut-n-paste look to it. Im not sure if it's even avoidable though (maybe a slightly darker peak??). Id sure try though, cause even if it means spending many hours getting this perfect it would be worth it.
Congrats!
EDIT: I wrote my comments before reading any of the others (never want to be biased by other opinions
I never had it. };]
There are ways to avoid the look you are referring. I hinted at them a little in my above comments but it's actually way more detailed and can take hours to do right, especially on an image with this much resolution. It is literally a pixel by pixel fix across the entire section where mountains meet sky, down to the grid magnification, but the results are worth the effort. Especially with a one of a kind shot like this. You definitely don't want to use the brush on more than just a few pixels between the two blends or you'll get a blurred effect, which is not what one would be going for. I figure Marc has enough PS experience he'll catch my drift.
The image being off the chart, I'm more impressed with the thought process and execution of that process. We all know I don't push myself to any limits(yet), but I almost can't grasp how you come to the conclusions you come to in the field, and then do it. For ten minutes to go by during a series of brackets, and it all comes together in the end must have been at least a little lucky, eh? Anyway, I'm most impressed!
Chris
Chris
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-11666-12012
Anyone want to buy a used 1dsm3? ;]
I also agree with Nic's comment about it looking like a composite. That's one of the first things I noticed, especially in the large version. I think your repost looks much more natural. Too bad you can't post a large version of the repost.
In any case, outstanding as usual!
As a side note, I thought I was the first to comment on this (LOL!) until I reread my comment.
I can only say I am stunned by this image. Thanks for sharing how you did it.