Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Yellow-cr. Night Heron
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Yellow-cr. Night Heron

by Barbara Graham

Gallery: AvianPosted September 23, 2011330 views16 comments
Canon EOS REBEL T2i
EF400mm f/5.6L USM
9/6/2011 – 7:11:52 PM
1/100 sec
Manual
f/5.6
ISO 400
Tripod
Harris Neck NWR, Georgia
Raw, CS5, 55% of FF (most of the crop was from the top, with a bit from the left)

Pros: I think the sharpness and detail held up to the crop pretty well. I like the perch and the vegetation on the water as a background and the light.

Cons: 55% of FF.

Comments and suggestions are always desired and appreciated.

Thank you!








Comments

16 comments
Comment posted by Peter J. Morrissey on September 23, 2011 at 1:17 PM
This is a really great photograph. What kind of tripod and head did you use, I am looking to replace my tripod?
Registered on July 3, 2011, 188 Posts, 969 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on September 23, 2011 at 1:55 PM
IMO this is your best image posted in Avian to date.

It is a good subject - the Yellow-crowned Night-Heron isn't nearly as widely distributed at the Black-crowned.

The pose is very good, showing off the plumage and head and beak to advantage.

The perch is an asset in the image, adding texture and form without overpowering the image.

The setting is neutral for the most part and makes a decent background to show off the subject without distracting from it.

Technicals look good, especially in the larger version.

Your 400mm max will limit what you can capture, so you'll be forced to crop more than others. This is probably as much as you will want to crop in the future in order to retain sufficient image quality and enough pixels for larger versions of the image.

With this opportunity and 400mm I would probably have composed this as a landscape format with more empty space on the right. That would have reduced the amount of cropping needed here, I think. That assumes, of course, that there wasn't some distracting element on the right.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Scott Frye on September 23, 2011 at 3:09 PM
I like the green moss showing on his beak -- gives me a sense of where he has been. The orange eye looks good -- good look at this species
Registered on February 3, 2007, 387 Posts, 1136 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on September 23, 2011 at 4:13 PM
OK, now we are talking. This is a very nice shot Barbara. I agree with everything Rich D stated. A great subject, and that makes a difference. Nice detail (55% is not bad). Nice setting with great habitat, but not distracting. Great job at 1/100s. Keep what you did with this shot in mind as you pursue your next shots. Remember, just because a bird presents itself as a POTENTIAL subject does not mean it is a good subject in a good location at a good time to make a pleasing image. This was a good photo op executed well.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on September 23, 2011 at 4:56 PM
Richard has given you a good critique and good advice. I know the spot very well where you took this—there is a colony of YCNHs in the SW corner of Woody Pond. Usually, the morning light there is pretty harsh, and I pass it by. I'll have to get down there in the evening sometime.

55% of FF isn't bad, if you are shooting from a solid platform in even light like this.
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Ray Whitt on September 23, 2011 at 6:42 PM
Really like the setting and the perch. Nice detail in the dark and the light feathers, excellent.

Ray
Registered on May 27, 2011, 92 Posts, 2619 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on September 23, 2011 at 10:31 PM
Barbara, your images keep getting better and better! I think this one is my favorite I have seen from you to date.Great comp, love the moss hanging from the beak! Good techs as well! BRAVO :toast: :toast: :toast:
Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments
Comment posted by John Tobias on September 23, 2011 at 11:19 PM
Well done Barbara, this is a really nice image. The duck weed on its beak just adds a bit of a touch of humor to the shot, makes me wonder if it just tried for a fish and missed! Thanks for sharing, keep up the good work!
Registered on September 12, 2009, 2120 Posts, 6455 Comments
Comment posted by Barbara Graham on September 23, 2011 at 11:34 PM
Thank you so much for the comments and also for the further instruction. I greatly appreciate it.
Registered on July 27, 2010, 1310 Posts, 5035 Comments
Comment posted by Ashley Vincent on September 24, 2011 at 1:50 AM
Everything in this image works for me Barbara, although going by your "cons", if whatever you cropped out was pretty much all filled with that vegetation on the surface of the water, I would have left much more of it in as a uniform backdrop, making the frame rectangular, and composing the picture so the Heron sits more to the left.
Registered on March 1, 2011, 154 Posts, 2083 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Shellenberg on September 24, 2011 at 1:55 PM
Very nice image, Barbara. Great detail in the heron, and very nice light. That angled perch and the crop that you chose make for a great composition. Nice background with no distractions. A great job.

The crop does not appear to be an issue to me, you have plenty of detail in the larger post.
Registered on February 6, 2008, 168 Posts, 3118 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on September 24, 2011 at 3:53 PM
I think that it turned out really well, Barbara. Interesting bird, nice pose, fine detail. I don't see a contribution of percent crop to the image quality here. It's a 10 MP image which is quite a respectable size. I'd be more concerned about the very slow ss: this bird was very cooperative about remaining still. After discussing crop effects at length on this website my conclusion is that, in general, the main reason to strive for a high % crop is that it is an indicator of how closely you were able to approach the bird. With a 400 mm lens you need to get pretty close, especially for a small bird. Incidentally, I find it curious that one of my birder friends told me that many birders don't like to see nature photographers approach birds closely (key question: under any circumstances?). They apparently would like if we used very low percent crops (i.e. maximum magnification). :smile:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by SandyRichardsBrown on September 24, 2011 at 11:00 PM
Wow, excellent, especially for that large of a crop.
Richard said it all, and well, so I'll just add a "bravo" !
Sany
Registered on November 24, 2003, 3937 Posts, 12909 Comments
Comment posted by Angela McCain on September 25, 2011 at 1:23 PM
Nicely done Barbara. Keep headed this direction.
Registered on April 19, 2009, 367 Posts, 3589 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on September 26, 2011 at 12:56 PM
Very cool pose and setting to this. Rich D has some wonderful tips and I also like his choice of a landscape composition. Sometimes the setting the bird is in adds as much as the bird to the overall image. Nice job in getting this shot for 7 pm time frame and well seen.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by May Haga on September 26, 2011 at 2:42 PM
Very well captured Barbara.
May
Registered on February 22, 2007, 714 Posts, 8470 Comments