Fiery Gloriosa
by Gary Yeoh
The exposure of this one is tricky. The leaves are very thin and easily overexposed but the center of the gloriosa is fairly radio-opaque and underexposed. I have burn this area but did not want to over-do it to avoid the posteriorized effect and hence the center of the flower is very bright. Anyway I kind of like the bright area radiating into the petals which look like white fire.
Positive image included for comparison. Do you have any preference?
GE mammogram machine 28kV 24 mAmp. CS5.
Comments
20 commentsI think I prefer the positive but it's really close. I like both of them.
Compositionally, i feel like there are two subjects (the top and bottom) in the image. For me the lower subject is more elegant. I particularly like those rolled tips. In the top there seems to be a sort of tangle with the stem and the anthers. That weakens the image for me a bit.
I'm still very impressed with the images and what I would really like to see, if you're taking requests, having seen this, is an X-Ray treatment of a fern.
These are really neat.
pat
Both are fascinating. I sort of lean toward the positive because of its apparent sharpness throughout. They would make a terrific diptych. Great stuff.
Pat & Scott:
I see what you are saying about the composition. Initially I was going to only image the flower but I also like the curled tips in the leaves so I ended up including them. They do indeed looked like two compositions but I am hoping the stem provides a bridge between them. The top part with its disorganized lines going everywhere like a flame is contrasted by elegant flow of lines ending the those curls in the lower portion.
I have in mind to do a few compositions with just leaves only and ferns would certainly be good candidates.
Nathan
Mauro
lucy