Greenshank
by David Sewell
Within the UKNP gallery, several photographers are not keen on reflections in photos. I think the main reason is that usually the bird itself ends up small in the frame as a result. Here is a greenshank with the reflection deliberately cut out. Do you think the photo would be better with the reflection left in but the bird smaller? Views for and against equally welcome.
If you would like a comparison, I have posted a green sandpiper (with reflection) taken during the same session in the UKNP gallery.
David
Nikon D300, 600mm Nikon, tripod mounted. 200 iso, 1/1600th @ f5.0
Comments
10 commentsI like this.
Its not the reflections I don't like its the way they inhibit the cropping or framing potential , and as you have pointed out- end up smaller in the frame.
Cheers
john
When I'm working the related Greater Yellowlegs here in the U.S. I spend as much time with the bird as it allows and hope to get full reflections and close compositions in the same session rather than employ cropping with the loss of quality that results.
Also like Rich, if the bird sticks around long enough I will get shots with and without full reflections in the same session and then later find within them those that suit my tastes. I like frame filling shots but I also enjoy images where the birds are small in the frame.
David
cheers
Rob