Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Rifle Falls (again)
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Rifle Falls (again)

by Angela Classen

Gallery: LandscapePosted June 25, 2011717 views8 comments
Here's another comp of Rifle Falls from last weekend. I wasn't prepared for the amount of mist swirling around in some spots where I shot, thus I (and my lens) got soaked. I tried to remove some of the spots but I'm sure you eagle-eyes will see every one of them :wink: (Suggestions on better technique to remove water drops would be appreciated, BTW.)

Canon Rebel Xti, tripod
10-22 mm lens
ISO 100, F14 @ 1/13

Comments

8 comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on June 25, 2011 at 7:20 PM
My poor old weak eyes can't see the first water spot. :eek: The only nit I have is the washed out sky in the ULHC. Not much you can do about that in post processing. Maybe a bit tighter crop would reduce the significance. I like water that looks like water flowing and it is done quite well here. Also, a little darkening of the midtones might help with the flat light.
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on June 25, 2011 at 8:57 PM
The angle here is more dynamic, Angela. Could maybe see working the light to create more drama.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on June 26, 2011 at 1:37 PM
Angela,

I guess I'm failing at being an expert cause I can't see any remnants of any water drops! Ok, maybe a couple in the larger version... but nothing I would be concerned about. :smile: Actually, I'm more distracted by the UL corner than anything else in the image. I think this is a great capture of the falls, but my eye is drawn out of the frame. Looks like some partly cloudy/blue sky up there so I'm wondering if you could selectively work on that corner it could become less of a liability. If you could I think that would improve this quite a bit.

I do like the grasses at the bottom providing a solid base for your composition of the trio of falls.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by John Tobias on June 26, 2011 at 5:36 PM
Angela, I think I like this one better than the last falls you posted. IMHO there is less in this image to distract your attention from the falls. Thanks for sharing.
Registered on September 12, 2009, 2120 Posts, 6455 Comments
Comment posted by John Williams on June 26, 2011 at 7:23 PM
Holy Cow there's a lot of water spots in this one! ( :wink: I wouldn't have found any if you hadn't got me to looking.)

This is a great set of falls Angela, and I like this angle/comp. Catching them with some color/late light in that upper left corner would be sweet!
Registered on September 6, 2007, 221 Posts, 5985 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Hackett on June 26, 2011 at 9:18 PM
I like the previous one better. The upper left hand corner seems a bit distracting to me
Registered on January 12, 2008, 71 Posts, 192 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on June 27, 2011 at 12:30 PM
Angela, This is a wonderful falls and I do like this view of it. I have the same feelings about the u l corner as others, but still enjoy this shot. I think I would want to visit this location a few times.

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Bret Edge on June 28, 2011 at 12:19 AM
I like the composition and texture in the water due to your chosen shutter speed. The blown out corner is distracting and could be fixed with a blended exposure (if you made a darker exposure, that is). I like the angle here a lot, though.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 711 Posts, 6363 Comments