Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Enduring Spirit  +rp
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Enduring Spirit +rp

by Lon Overacker

Gallery: LandscapePosted May 27, 2011362 views23 comments
Thanks so much for the comments on my previous image. Feels great to be back and having some images to post again.

This one here is a slight departure from my norm and may not be everyone's cup of tea. I haven't done many black and whites, but more and more and especially on this trip, I am "seeing" more b&w. I always try and I prefer to visualize a b&w scene before the capture. But I'd be lyin' if I said I've never converted to b&w just to see what it looks like... :wink:

The scene here called out for the higher contrast, simple tones, motion and just said b&w. I'm wondering if that holds true for the viewer though. Oh, and also it's pretty obvious that most of the branches are blurred from movement as you get away from the core of the tree. I knew this and was hoping it adds to the overall impact rather than detracts.

Any help with a title for this would be appreciated. I just can't seem to find anything that really nails this scene.

All honest comments and critiques welcome!

4x5, 210mm, V100, f/22 @1s
TK's Luminosity masks and new Triple Play

Thanks!
Lon

Comments

23 comments
Comment posted by Sarah Marino on May 27, 2011 at 3:55 PM
Hi Lon - I love b+w images like this so this is my cup of tea! I really like the texture of the water and the overall composition. I tend to prefer stronger contrasts when I process my own b+w images, so I might use a bright lights luminosity mask to brighten the lightest tones just a bit more (with the exception of the lightest tone under the branch with looks to be just the right tone to me). Otherwise, I really enjoy this image.
Registered on November 10, 2008, 23 Posts, 393 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Marcellini on May 27, 2011 at 4:00 PM
You say higher contrast, but I want more! ;) I would add a bit more black to the pockets of dark in the top so it doesn't have a half and half look so much. I don't mind the blur and love the overall comp.
Registered on November 27, 2007, 250 Posts, 2468 Comments
Comment posted by Phil Pogledich on May 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM
Black and white suits this image perfectly and the conversion looks pretty good to me. I can see bringing up the brighter tones in the upper 1/2 of the image but otherwise contrast looks about right. I don't mind the blurred branches and I share your view that they add to the dynamic nature of the scene.
Registered on August 24, 2009, 123 Posts, 3099 Comments
Comment posted by Sean Bagshaw on May 27, 2011 at 4:46 PM
I love the stark simplicity of this one Lon. Very subtle and powerful at the same time. I'm wondering if you could dodge through a selection to create just a bit more separation between the branch and water on the lower left side?
Registered on February 14, 2007, 99 Posts, 479 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on May 27, 2011 at 4:54 PM
Thanks for the comments so far. I'm sure everyone goes through this. You work on an image for so long and pretty soon you can't see the forest for the trees, and in this case I was worried I had already carried the contrast too far. Eventually you just have to step away and let someone else take a look. Here's repost with some increased highlights, darkened shadows and overall contrast boost.

And Sean, good idea - that could be tough, but I might try and do that. Thanks all for the comments.

Oh, here's a larger version too.

Thanks!
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on May 27, 2011 at 5:36 PM
You have conveyed the movement of the raging water so well that this is a little unsettling. Evocative, emotional, threatening even. Hmmm, must be art! :biggrin:
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Lundh on May 27, 2011 at 7:30 PM
Honestly, this really is very cool. I have always wished for an image like this in my portfolio. I have no nits with this, I think you captured and presented it perfectly! :toast:
Registered on April 28, 2004, 774 Posts, 4351 Comments
Comment posted by Eva McDermott on May 27, 2011 at 8:59 PM
Your repost nails it for me Lon. Fine art indeed! Morris explains my feelings perfectly about this image. It is also metaphorical in a way with all the violent weather and floods across the US.
Registered on January 4, 2009, 1015 Posts, 13229 Comments
Comment posted by Nancy Lea Sandy on May 27, 2011 at 9:06 PM
Second image is much better. The deeper contrast adds the extra spark this image deserved. It's full of drama, energy, and motion. Perfect for b&w. Really well done.
Registered on January 24, 2011, 576 Posts, 6942 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on May 27, 2011 at 9:30 PM
Lon, I prefer the second version, but I think you could pop the whites even a little more. It is an evocative image as Morris mentioned, but it is not up there with my favorite Overackers.
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments
Comment posted by Gabi Lach on May 27, 2011 at 11:33 PM
Motion of water mimicking motion of the tree is amazing here, Lon. Great catch! So smooth and beautiful...
Registered on May 1, 2007, 101 Posts, 3187 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Duval on May 28, 2011 at 2:50 AM
If it makes it, then it will be an enduring spirit, bowed but unbroken, assailed but undefeated. However it means futility to me, the river will overwhelm it, so this image could have many titles based just on how the viewer perceives the story. Sorry, no happy ending here for me. Except for you Lon, another keeper. Very powerful image.

Paul
Registered on June 30, 2009, 508 Posts, 1907 Comments
Comment posted by Nicolaus Wegner on May 28, 2011 at 2:14 PM
I honestly have mixed feelings about this one Lon. The conversion, exposure, and processing are right on the money to my biased eyes. Not exactly sure but perhaps it is the composition that is throwing me off. I almost feel like having that branch further up the frame might have helped. Maybe a slightly lower perspective to bring the branch up a bit more and free it from the darker area below?

Funny, after writing the above, I almost deleted it and just said awesome work. Because it really is, as it 99 percent of the photography I see on this page. Perhaps as photographers were are getting too nit picky about details those who actually buy prints will probably never even see. On the flip side though, hard critiques push us all to improve our game even more. I definitely feel like I must work harder when someone critiques my images or points out something I completely missed.

Any way Lon, one small thing that I REALLY do like about this image is the movement of the top branches. It almost adds a sense of the branch flowing in the same manner as the water. On the flip side one could say that the movement of the branches takes away from the detail. Hahah...just kidding.

Great work as usual. :toast:
Registered on February 21, 2010, 133 Posts, 1509 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Chamberlain on May 28, 2011 at 3:06 PM
When I view and evaluate an image, I always go with my initial reaction. Does it have visual, or emotional impact? If it does then I view it as good. Sometimes it can have some minor flaws that I pick up on after the initial reaction, but that never lessons my opinion of the image. I think we as photogs get way too caught up in the technicals of photography. I understand why, but technical flaws do hinder the non photographer's ability to enjoy, or appreciate an image for it's simple beauty.

I think this is a very artistic interpretation of this scene. The b&w is definately right for the situation as well. I can see the benefits of some dodge/burn and contrast tweaks, but my initial reaction was that this was "good"!

Chris
Registered on March 13, 2007, 500 Posts, 8365 Comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on May 28, 2011 at 5:31 PM
Very nice, Lon. It looks great the way the tree follows the motion of the water and I love the curves of the waves.
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Lucy Aron on May 28, 2011 at 5:36 PM
My only nit is the bottom left hand corner looks a little too dark. Otherwise beautiful.


lucy
Registered on February 25, 2011, 189 Posts, 1160 Comments
Comment posted by Kyle L. Krause on May 28, 2011 at 7:25 PM
Lon, I think this is superb. Very artistic,moody and powerful image. B&W works great, I'd like to see more b&w from you. Inspiring stuff! :wink:
Registered on June 15, 2010, 29 Posts, 605 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on May 28, 2011 at 9:01 PM
I can relate to what Chris and Nicolaus said. My initial reactions were: cool, but.... And unfortunatley, minor as they are, it's the 'buts' that form my initial impression and that's what makes it or breaks it for me. I personally find the blur distracting, not becuase its blur per se, but because i dont find it aesthetic here--it looks more like a double-exposure accident rather than something that adds to the dynamics. I also wish there was more of the white surrounding the branch, as in the top of the shot.
So, like i said--cool, but not a showcase shot for you.
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Dietrich Gloger on May 28, 2011 at 11:23 PM
Another very fine harvest of your recent trip! The black and white definitely works great here. The tree fits so well to the movement of the water. And I really like the dark bottom of the composition. That bit of blur in the tree's branches is not an issue - it does not distract, but does not "add" either in my opinion. Contrast looks fine too to me - both versions..
:wink:
Registered on January 26, 2007, 360 Posts, 9876 Comments
Comment posted by Vance Gese on May 30, 2011 at 1:10 AM
Love the simplicity and the remarkable array of tones. Even more though, the sense of tension, the feel of how remarkable it is for this single tree to withstand the flow of the water, yet its bending makes you wonder if it will. Maybe I'm reading more into this than intended but I think this is simply fantastic, Lon.
Registered on November 13, 2008, 298 Posts, 6629 Comments
Comment posted by David Edwards on May 30, 2011 at 5:20 AM
I like this image a lot, Lon, partly because I tried a very similar shot on my last trip to Girraween NP and found it very difficult to capture a static tree in rushing water, but mostly because of it's beautiful subject contrast. It is a shame about the blurred bits of branch, but the strength of the idea carries above this for me. I like the feeling of R to L motion as the water bends the tree over, indicating a struggle against the elements. The texture and flow of the water is excellent, and the extra contrast in the repost is very nice. I find titles very difficult, but the feeling of hanging on and enduring spirit is there. How about 'Against the Flow' (see, I told you :wink: ).
Registered on December 6, 2008, 142 Posts, 2623 Comments
Comment posted by Anil Rao on May 30, 2011 at 1:12 PM
A delightful image, Lon. One which packs a big emotional punch. The simplicity is a nice cover for the deeper meaning that almost anyone can identify with. Very nice, indeed.

Registered on November 15, 2003, 234 Posts, 4923 Comments
Comment posted by Art Escobado on May 30, 2011 at 11:29 PM
Simple. Elegant.B&W is a great choice here.
Registered on January 7, 2007, 0 Posts, 775 Comments