Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
A Delicate Balance
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

A Delicate Balance

by Robert Beideman

Gallery: LandscapePosted April 9, 2011609 views18 comments
I had the chance to take a month and drive from Boston to Utah/Arizona and back last October, mixing in some business meetings with a good few weeks of solid shooting with friends. Fantastically cathartic...

Here's one of the images from that journey.

For most of you, I'm sure it's a familiar location. But perhaps it's at least a new perspective...

Two exposures iHDR'd. Exposures were made separately for the sky and for the foreground.

Nikon D700
17-35mmf2.8 @17mm
1/4s exposure for the sky (with a lightning trigger)
2s exposure for the rest of the scene (pulled back quite a bit in the end...but I wanted to have the detail available)

All C&C welcome!

Robert

Comments

18 comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on April 9, 2011 at 12:21 PM
Wow, such a powerful image. I love the carefully crafted composition, the rich color, excellent detail and sharpness, and of course, the drama. Great shot.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Greenwood on April 9, 2011 at 2:04 PM
A very different view! The arch looks very odd from this perspective, but the storm in the background is fantastic!
Registered on November 9, 2003, 229 Posts, 1523 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on April 9, 2011 at 5:20 PM
Wow, A great shot Robert. The large version is especially nice! Love the colors and detail, and then there is that lightning!

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Morkel Erasmus on April 9, 2011 at 6:00 PM
this certainly is a dramatic moment over a very nice scene Robert!

sorry to be picky, but looking at the large file, it seems that there are quite a few "hard edges" between the rocks/FG and sky, which doesn't really look natural.

which blending method did you use? :confused:
Registered on March 22, 2011, 385 Posts, 2068 Comments
Comment posted by Michael J Greene, on April 9, 2011 at 6:48 PM
Very cool shot Robert and wonderful capture. I wish there was a bit of room between the legs of the arch and the barrel distortion is noticeable as well...Overall, I think this is fantastic capture. A unique take on this iconic spot with some incredible conditions.

Michael
Registered on June 18, 2009, 86 Posts, 2317 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Dayton on April 9, 2011 at 8:57 PM
This is one of the best perspectives that I've ever seen of Delicate Arch.
This lightning strike is quite an addition. This is very dramatic.
I'm looking forward to more of your postings from your October trip.
Registered on November 11, 2008, 281 Posts, 3958 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on April 9, 2011 at 9:33 PM
Fascinating scene and perspective. Some really unusual shooting conditions. Could maybe see burning down the lights and opening up the shadows a bit more to balance the light.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Zack Clothier on April 10, 2011 at 3:18 AM
Wow, what an incredible capture and unique view of the Arch. Nicely done. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2010, 343 Posts, 2257 Comments
Comment posted by Anil Rao on April 10, 2011 at 5:46 AM
Very nice. I love the intensity of the storm and the overall mood that it gives to the rest of the scene.
Registered on November 15, 2003, 234 Posts, 4923 Comments
Comment posted by Andrei Malashenko on April 10, 2011 at 12:19 PM
Nice dramatoc photograph. Well done! :toast:
Registered on March 18, 2011, 13 Posts, 68 Comments
Comment posted by Rafael Rojas on April 10, 2011 at 3:38 PM
Wow image from a wow place...and more importantly, wow lighting conditions. Well done!!
Registered on March 1, 2009, 56 Posts, 623 Comments
Comment posted by Luis Argerich on April 11, 2011 at 7:03 PM
What can I say? It's a fantastic shot!
Registered on December 22, 2009, 91 Posts, 1349 Comments
Comment posted by Aaron Feinberg on April 11, 2011 at 10:54 PM
Might crop 4:5 to eliminate some left side but wicked cool shot :) Which trigger? Or was it the 'lightning trigger'? :p

aF
Registered on October 26, 2009, 399 Posts, 2789 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on April 12, 2011 at 2:41 AM
Fantastic conditions, and a real cool perspective--congrats for getting these two things together!

Morkel wasn't being picky, he was being observant. When a post here has 400+ views and only 13 comments, it generally means there are major technical problems with the shot. Here, the dark outlines around the arch etc make this look like two shots spliced together, which as Morkel notes, is unnatural looking. The fg is much too bright compared to the arch. I think if you cant make the blend work, you're better off just using the shorter exposure even if the fg becomes heavily shadowed. If you need help with the blend, either post the two exposures here or email me them, and id be happy to offer suggestions.
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Arild Heitmann on April 12, 2011 at 7:00 AM
Looks fantastic! What a dramatic scene!
Registered on October 13, 2010, 27 Posts, 378 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Beideman on April 12, 2011 at 7:58 AM
Morkel and Stan,

Great observations...and it's clear that I've got some work to do. The two exposures were pretty far off of each other (1/4 and 2s), making the blend pretty extreme no matter what I do. Perhaps Stan is on the mark...and the darker exposure may need to stand on it's own.

The processing of this one was also done quite some time ago, before I learned a lot more about lum masks (my masking was pretty extreme, unblended, and hard-edged then). Like I said...I'm hopeful that I've learned a lot since then.

I'll definitely revisit this one in the coming days...hopefully bringing some new knowledge and processing experience to bear...and work to get the blend right (hopefully :wink: ). If it's not a problem, I'd love to pass the resulting rework by the two of you for your thoughts on it!

Everyone else, thank you for your feedback as well!!!

Robert
Registered on April 7, 2011, 27 Posts, 74 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on April 12, 2011 at 12:14 PM
No problem at all. I was going to suggest lum masks, but with the big spread in exposures it may or may not work. But its worth an attempt, cause the subject is extremely cool. :wavey:
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Morkel Erasmus on April 12, 2011 at 1:04 PM
Another option is using more exposures and thereby taming the huge difference in dynamic range. But that of course needs to be sorted out in-camera in the field :).

Would love to see the stand-alone lightning exposure...
Registered on March 22, 2011, 385 Posts, 2068 Comments