Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Blue Ridge Buck
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Blue Ridge Buck

by Andrew Sentipal

Gallery: WildlifePosted March 5, 2011107 views3 comments
I found this nice buck on Skyline Drive in Shenandoah National Park last November. He was more interested in the nearby doe than me. Nikon D300 ISO 1250 1/1000 F9 with Nikon 70-200 lens. Strong sidelighting so I toned the area on the left off him down a bit and opened up the shadows on his back slightly. Comments and critiques please. I learn from every post ? Is the background too distracting ?

A 10 pointer if I am counting correctly.

Comments

3 comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on March 6, 2011 at 9:18 AM
That's a nice buck and a good photo. I don't find the background distracting, it's characteristic. I like the sharpness in the leaves around the buck, I can hear them crunching underfoot. You might crop a bit off the top, which would focus more attention on the buck and darken the whites on his head a tiny bit.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on March 6, 2011 at 1:45 PM
You were up against some contrasty lighting. I think you did a good job with the processing you mention, but I agree that if you can dial the whites back a little it will help. Background distraction can be a matter of taste. To my eye, the busy nature of the tall grasses on the left edge are more distracting than the dark timber. The positioning of the front legs (beyond your control) gives him a little bit of an unbalanced feeling. Perhaps you have other frames or at least in the future it is one more thing to be watching! :wink:
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on March 6, 2011 at 11:22 PM
Hi Andrew, that looks like a very close, yet relaxed encounter; it is always great if an animal allows you this close. Apart from what Lon and Mark have already brought up I have two points that could have improved this. First of all a lower angle (eye-level rather than top down) would have given this a completely different, more appealing look IMO. Secondly I am confused by your exposure techs. With a busy BG like this a wider aperture would have helped to create more BG separation. Further your ISO and consequently your SS are much higher than you needed here. The high ISO will make it more difficult to retrieve shadows and highlights as dynamic range decreases with higher ISO values.
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments