Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Chowade River
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Chowade River

by KatherineAnne Enns

Gallery: LandscapePosted January 20, 2011203 views8 comments
This was taken early in the fall, in the morning on the way to work in northeastern British Columbia on a remote site in the Rocky Mountain Foothills. Its a tonemapped image from three exposures shot with a Canon 5D II, and a 24-105, at 400 ISO, and variable shutter speeds of course. It was then processed in CS4 with Nik Effex, using glamor glow. I tried a crop of this as well, but I liked the foreground too much.

Comments

8 comments
Comment posted by Danny Laureys on January 20, 2011 at 10:14 PM
Very Nice!!! :toast: :toast:
Registered on January 5, 2008, 590 Posts, 1261 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on January 21, 2011 at 12:37 AM
This is lovely! I like the balance of light and the and the painterly feel.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Balakumar Kaushik on January 21, 2011 at 4:31 AM
Simple and neat composition with some nice light. The filter effect is probably a bit overdone IMHO which has created smudgy patches; but again that's what gives it a painting-like look.
Registered on January 4, 2008, 98 Posts, 1403 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on January 21, 2011 at 7:59 AM
Welcome to NPN Katherine, and thanks for a beautiful post. This is quite lovely, and obviously carefully crafted. Well done.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by dean hebert on January 21, 2011 at 12:16 PM
What a beautiful scene. Unfortunately the processing does nothing for me, I wish I could see more detail and a more realistic blend of exposures.
Registered on August 4, 2010, 70 Posts, 1132 Comments
Comment posted by KatherineAnne Enns on January 21, 2011 at 1:11 PM
Hi folks and thanks for the kind words. I used Photomatix for this, when I could have used HDR Efex pro, and maybe I could try that instead. Its three images, and even though they were shot with a tripod and a shutter release cord, that bit of discontinuity between images (that gives it the smudge) is something I am either trying to get, or trying to avoid, and I am never sure which until I try a few things. I also wanted the richness of the underexposure, the gravels and vegetation looks so much heavier, thus the blend. But I am not (as one of my wildlife biologist friends tells me) a digital space monkey. I dont come by this stuff naturally at all. Here is the midrange photograph to show what it looks like, shot with a Canon 5D II, as above.
Registered on January 5, 2011, 22 Posts, 137 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on January 22, 2011 at 6:21 PM
KatherineAnne,

Welcome to NPN and the ES&S/Landscape gallery. I believe this is your first post here? I see you just recently joined and so welcome aboard!

I think your processing has rendered a very pretty scene, although somewhat unnatural, but in a PhotoArt kind of way. I like what you've presented and I think it works.

Very close to this being a better fit in the Photo Art gallery - and thanks for your discussion in your latest comments. But it's very difficult to know if someone is trying to create something in an artistic vein, or simply trying to make improvements to the technical aspects such as contrast, color, dynamic range etc. Anyway, a topic and discussion for outside my comments here.

I like the result.

We look forward to your images and participation on NPN.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by KatherineAnne Enns on January 23, 2011 at 2:00 PM
Hi Lon, thanks for your note. Points well taken.

The blur is unintentional, and I think it’s a function of the tripod being on a bridge and there was just enough motion with my weight shifting to jig the dynamic range series of shots ever so slightly. (I guess I could lose a few pounds, lol!). Also I used Photomatix Pro 3 to do the tonemapped blend, and I have noticed that it promises to align image components but it is just not that good at that part. It is easy to use for the learning HDR-er though I may try this in the above mentioned Effex and see what happens. Thanks for your advice.

The colors are actually true, but it is a blend. Its a function of the HDR. I this image is about to fall off the end of the table here, soon :smile: Kat
Registered on January 5, 2011, 22 Posts, 137 Comments