Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Coming Home
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Coming Home

by Ron Richins

Gallery: LandscapePosted December 2, 2010673 views17 comments
Taken the morning of the incredible sunrise in Zion. I've seen shots from other areas of the park. Fortunately there were only a few of us on the bridge. This is a manual blend of 2 exposures. The sky was exposed for 2 secs. at ISO 100, and the land was exposed for 2 secs. at ISO 1600. Only a little noise reduction added to the land. Any nits welcome.

Comments

17 comments
Comment posted by Joel Hazelton on December 2, 2010 at 11:23 AM
Ron, this shot is lovely! Beautiful sunrise and a compelling composition with lots of depth. I do have a couple nits regarding the processing. The sky seems a bit heavy (particular with the cloud on the left) and I can see some pretty pronounced evidence of the blend along the tops of the mountains and the tree (although maybe that's a result of web compression?).
Registered on August 6, 2008, 194 Posts, 1315 Comments
Comment posted by Gino Cortez on December 2, 2010 at 11:23 AM
Wow! Pastel eye-candy throughout! The sky, cottonwoods, and light on the Watchman are fabulous. I'm seeing a slight magenta/pink color cast on my monitor at work. This is gorgeous! :toast:
Registered on November 23, 2010, 57 Posts, 396 Comments
Comment posted by Nicolaus Wegner on December 2, 2010 at 11:24 AM
Definitely a pretty shot Ron, but this has a very photo art look to it. Somewhere between a photomanipulation and painting. Was this intentional?

Regardless, it is unique in its own way, congrats on being there to witness this.
Registered on February 21, 2010, 133 Posts, 1509 Comments
Comment posted by Harry Lichtman on December 2, 2010 at 11:24 AM
Spectacular colors, and sky. The mountain shadows look a little flat on my monitor, so maybe a little more contrast there. Otherwise a fantastic capture. See a little fringing on far right cottonwood where it meets the sky,

Harry :toast:
Registered on September 17, 2010, 304 Posts, 3507 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Richins on December 2, 2010 at 11:34 AM
Joel, I do see what you're saying about the tree. It's much less pronounced in the large file, but I could go in and refine that edge a bit more.

Nicolaus, very little adjustments were made to the files. Perhaps the biggest adjustment I made was to use a warmer white balance on the sky. Also, usually I like darker images, but for this I intentionally kept it light.

Thanks for the comments.
Registered on March 6, 2008, 113 Posts, 1009 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 2, 2010 at 11:41 AM
Ron, the processing doesn't work for me personally here. The light levels are bright in a very unnatural way throughout the landscape and the blending is evident around the treetop at right. I'd drop everything below the sky down at least two full stops and then work to bring out color and luminosity, maybe keeping the river a bit brighter than the rest to retain a nice path. The shadows on the Watchman are nearly as bright as much of the sky when in fact there would naturally be probably four stops difference. The sky seems washed out a bit and also seems off. The dark shadowy blues I remember from that morning in the clouds here have nearly identical exposure levels as the brightest of red highlights in the ULC. I'd probably rework this completely by starting with a darker image and brightening it selectively and more naturally if possible. From a compositional perspective, I can't fault anything and I think once you get the processing down on this one the landscape will glow and really compliment that firey sky.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by scott lanz on December 2, 2010 at 12:05 PM
This looks way too green. Oh wait, that's a reflection on my monitor of me being green with envy. Your image is gorgeous. Certainly one of the best I've seen from here. I agree that the processing makes this looks a little painterly, but I like it. :toast:
Registered on November 14, 2003, 840 Posts, 12902 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on December 2, 2010 at 12:53 PM
What an incredible moment of light! I love the luminosity of the distant peak, but overall the processing looks too, well, processed. I can even see obvious haloing around the cottonwood on the right, and around some of the peaks. I'd try Marc's advice and see where that takes you. Definitely worth getting this one right!
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by John Mumaw on December 2, 2010 at 7:42 PM
I have to agree with the rest re: 'development'. This is an outstanding scene and the light is super. However, the post work has rendered this artificially sweet, IMO.
Registered on September 9, 2005, 62 Posts, 2289 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Greenwood on December 2, 2010 at 8:11 PM
I am increasingly regretting that I missed being out and about on this particular morning in Zion. My hotel room had more of a sunset view than a sunrise view, and by the time that I realized what was taking place this morning and got my act together, it was too late. I applaud your effort to capture a morning composition of this scene. But I agree with the general consensus that you have over thought the post processing somewhat.
Registered on November 9, 2003, 229 Posts, 1523 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on December 2, 2010 at 8:59 PM
Lots of potential here I'd keep working on it. That is an incredible sky and you've got all the details to make it work. What a morning that was. Amazing how many folks were there to catch it.

The sky was exposed for 2 secs. at ISO 100, and the land was exposed for 2 secs. at ISO 1600. Only a little noise reduction added to the land.


Is that reversed :confused: The sky was give something like 4x the exposure that the land was?
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on December 2, 2010 at 9:41 PM
I have to agree with others in that while there is a nice pastel painted feel to this, it reeks of overprocessing and has the obvious halo on the tree. Once you get the processing right, this will be an amazing image.
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Art Escobado on December 2, 2010 at 10:02 PM
Ahh yes the Nov 8th morning was fantastic and you caught the Watchman sleeping!! Keep processing, good suggestions have been made. The image is in there.
Registered on January 7, 2007, 0 Posts, 775 Comments
Comment posted by John Williams on December 2, 2010 at 11:35 PM
I agree that this needs work, but is absolutely worth it. Beautiful colors and scene you captured!
Registered on September 6, 2007, 221 Posts, 5985 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on December 3, 2010 at 1:23 AM
Ron,

Without repeating too much, this is a beautiful scene and hopefully with some processing you can really make this one sing - and it's certainly worth the effort. As presented, I think the processing is a bit off. I hope you can repost, because it's a beautiful scene.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Schwarz on December 3, 2010 at 1:10 PM
Beautiful colors and comp. It looks like a painting. Mmust have been a fantastic morning.
Registered on November 29, 2006, 236 Posts, 1210 Comments
Comment posted by Kory Lidstrom on December 3, 2010 at 4:17 PM
A beautiful shot of an iconic spot. The sky seems a bit "off" though, can't put my finger on it.
Registered on November 19, 2008, 49 Posts, 1035 Comments