Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Gadwal-female
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Gadwal-female

by Ron Bielefeld

Gallery: AvianPosted November 21, 2010122 views14 comments
Not the best position in the air and I know a lot of people will not like the OOF trees at the bottom, but I like the detail in the bird. This was shot on a very dim light morning at ISO 1000 with no NR. This is one of the first shots I ever took with my new Canon 1D Mk IV. After only getting to use this new body for a few hours so far, I am very impressed. What I am most impressed with is the AF speed with the 500mm f/4, 1.4x TC combo. It is much faster than my 7D. Also, the fps is crazy. I did not think there would be a very noticeable difference between 8 fps on the 7D and 10 on the Mk IV. The first time I let is rip it scared me. IQ seems really good too. I hope my initial feelings just get better with time. We shall see.

Canon 1D Mk IV
500mm f/4 + 1.4x TC
ISO 1000
1/1000s
f/5.6
Manual exp.
HH
50% of FF
No NR

Comments

14 comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on November 21, 2010 at 4:22 PM
Can't recall seeing a flight shot of this species... you made this little lady look elegant. Would certainly like a better BG but for the 500 + 1.4X and for just starting to work on this bird you did a wonderful job. Congrats on the new toy.
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on November 21, 2010 at 4:41 PM
It's fun to see another 7D enthusiast trying out the Mark IV. Autofocus was my main concern with the camera. Everything else seems so much better than the 7D (except the price). Currently I'm very happy with the autofocus. As you know, it is different than the 7D. I haven't tried many BIF shots yet and I'm not very experienced in such shots too. So, I'm very glad to see that you are.
Regarding this shot, I am one of those who would prefer to see the OOF foreground cropped out. [I have found that all pixels are not created equal: those in the Mark IV are significantly less noisy and I'm finding it easier in post-processing and in cropping.) I think the big question is whether this image is as sharp as your usual images. I find it so hard to evaluate that. It's certainly very close. AF and exposure setup is so important. I found the following Canon document very useful for it: "AI Servo AF Custom Function & ISO Speed Settings Guide"
I can't figure out how to put the link to it here. However, if you just input that title into Google it pops up.
I look forward to seeing more BIF from you with this camera, Ron.
:toast:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on November 21, 2010 at 4:56 PM
Looks good to me as posted. I recently shot beside a friend with one of these cameras and the frame rate was quite impressive (putting my old D200 to shame when I attempted flight shots).
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on November 21, 2010 at 5:42 PM
Steve, thanks for the comment. The AF on the Mk. IV is different and it "appears" to act different than any other camera I have used. At first attempt to shoot BIF against busy BGs I seemed the AF was jumping all over the place. However, after spending just a few hours working with the camera it became very apparent that what I first thought was the AF's inability to stay focused on a subject was really due to the AF's blazing speed and sensitivity. If you keep the focus point on the subject it will grab it and grab it fast and hold on well. However, if you stray from the subject it will grab what it is seeing and do it fast. So, you really must be very good at keeping the focus point on your subject or it will appear to jump around. Against blue sky it grabs the subject almost instantly and never lets go. Really amazing sensitivity and speed. It will take a bit of getting used to, but everything new does, and overall it looks like this camera will be just awesome for my style of shooting.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by Derrick Lipinski on November 21, 2010 at 5:56 PM
Wonderful flight shot, Ron; congratulations on your new acquisition. I made the jump to the Mark IV from a 20D/40D in June and I haven't looked back (I always had AF issues with these two cameras and was beginning to think it was just me). The customization, speed and accuracy of the AF and the low ISO cannot be compared to a 40D... but then... neither can the price; so it should be much better. At any rate, I'm quite happy with mine. I would also recommend the document Steve is talking about as there are so many custom functions to know about - and they all have their uses. :smile:
Registered on October 5, 2007, 58 Posts, 2039 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Dudley on November 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM
Quite a demonstration of the prowess of both the new camera and its operator Ron. Ducks in flight are just so difficult IMO (my few "good ones" are groups of birds) and here the sharpness and detail are very good - especially for a speedster such as this. I'm quite jealous of your new toy (but not enough to spring for the cost of one, at least not yet). Have fun with it!!!
Registered on March 30, 2007, 437 Posts, 10915 Comments
Comment posted by Charles Gangas on November 21, 2010 at 8:50 PM
Very impressive Ron. At ISO 1000, no NR and 50% FF I think you're really going to like that new toy!
Registered on August 12, 2009, 544 Posts, 2414 Comments
Comment posted by Angela McCain on November 21, 2010 at 8:55 PM
Nice flight shot. The image quality is very good-especialy given the ISO of 1000. There is no noise at all that I can see. I look forward to new "improved" images, although your prior ones were so spot on, it scares me to think of it.
Registered on April 19, 2009, 367 Posts, 3589 Comments
Comment posted by Graham Brown on November 22, 2010 at 2:55 AM
I can certainly understand why you changed your 7D Ron I wish I could do the same. However it's not all about the camera and I think you've done very well to capture this bird sideways on. You're obviously benefitting by being able to shoot at higher iso's , this looks quite impressive without any NR. Graham
Registered on November 20, 2007, 275 Posts, 1365 Comments
Comment posted by Rob Drummond on November 22, 2010 at 4:52 AM
I'm jealous Ron , one day maybe. I prefer the trees in the background - they anchor the shot and give it perspective. A slightly different wing position may have been nice but a wonderful shot

cheers
Rob
Registered on November 8, 2003, 617 Posts, 8267 Comments
Comment posted by Sally King on November 22, 2010 at 10:26 AM
It doesn't look like it is flying, but it looks like it is floating. That is incredible. I always kind of like some land in flight shots as it places them in relation to that land. Very good detail. Sounds like we can expect even better than the great shots we have been seeing from you now that you have this new camera.
Registered on December 2, 2008, 416 Posts, 4450 Comments
Comment posted by Wayne Willison on November 22, 2010 at 3:56 PM
Congrats on the new gear, Ron. Good head detail, here. Bet you'll have fun with it.
Registered on April 10, 2009, 292 Posts, 3967 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on November 23, 2010 at 12:45 AM
Congrats on the new camera Ron, really nice hen Gadwall. Good job on the exposure against that bright sky. :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on November 24, 2010 at 8:08 PM
I like the OOF trees at the bottom, just that little bit at the bottom gives a sense of place. Love the eye contact, details & sharpness.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments