Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
White Rose
‹ PreviousFlora GalleryNext ›

White Rose

by Richard Sogn

Gallery: FloraPosted September 11, 201082 views18 comments
I'm hoping for feedback from the flora forum, as I have little experience in shooting or evaluating abstract photographs of flowers. I was trying to push myself into doing something a little different while at the Portland Rose Garden. This is of a pure white rose taken with a 180mm macro lens at f/4 so that only the edges of the petals are in focus. The yellow is from backlighting through the petals. I can't tell if it's junk, or an interesting abstract.

Comments

18 comments
Comment posted by Bill Fach on September 11, 2010 at 7:19 PM
Richard: Most definitely not junk. I like your POF/DOF, the color and the lines. Nicely seen and captured. >=))>
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1805 Posts, 26981 Comments
Comment posted by Buck Ward on September 11, 2010 at 7:51 PM
Luscious, creamy. Not junk.
Registered on December 8, 2003, 96 Posts, 1917 Comments
Comment posted by Ramamohan Pai on September 11, 2010 at 8:29 PM
Richard, Good layering effect here and the soft back lighting looks great as well.

In my limited experience I have found long focal lengths nearly useless for intimate abstracts. Shorter focal lengths like 50 to 100mm provide better perspectives as one can really go close and explore a lot more. It also provides the flexibility of hand holding.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 550 Posts, 9037 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on September 11, 2010 at 8:54 PM
I think this is a wonderful abstract. Certainly not junk!! Love the quality and texture of the light. Nicely done.
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Pat Sampson on September 11, 2010 at 10:44 PM
Certainly not junk Richard. I like the light and the image does hold my interest. I'd keep experimenting. I am.

Pat
Registered on May 19, 2007, 953 Posts, 15989 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on September 11, 2010 at 10:53 PM
Very subtle and yet very beautiful. :toast:
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Carol Hyman on September 11, 2010 at 11:40 PM
Definitely not junk, Richard, rather a very interesting abstract. Lovely softness.

Were you handholding the camera. Your plane of focus could have been a little sharper with a tripod and no winds.

And I like the image as is ...

:wavey:

Carol
Registered on January 18, 2007, 597 Posts, 8062 Comments
Comment posted by Muhammad Zaid Wani on September 12, 2010 at 1:00 AM
Beautiful image, Richard!
Registered on August 18, 2005, 23 Posts, 1406 Comments
Comment posted by Brigitte Lorenz on September 12, 2010 at 6:38 AM
beautiful abstract, Richard...lovely softness and light

Brigitte
Registered on January 10, 2009, 187 Posts, 1507 Comments
Comment posted by Mauro Pasquero on September 12, 2010 at 9:15 AM
Very tender image. I love its soft colors. Congrs.
Mauro
Registered on January 21, 2010, 650 Posts, 2500 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Sogn on September 12, 2010 at 1:28 PM
Thanks everyone for your comments.
Registered on January 17, 2007, 68 Posts, 210 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Dayton on September 12, 2010 at 2:41 PM
Lovely, Richard. For my personal taste this abstract has been artistically
presented. I like your depth of field choice.
Registered on November 11, 2008, 281 Posts, 3958 Comments
Comment posted by Catherine Reilly on September 12, 2010 at 5:27 PM
NOT JUNK! Well done!
Registered on August 16, 2006, 603 Posts, 9192 Comments
Comment posted by Albert Darmo on September 12, 2010 at 9:17 PM
Hi Richard :wavey: Come on!! dont be too hard on yourself! This is so close to being great!!! :eek: Try to get a bit more detail on the petal edges, because of the light colors.perhaps a 20mm ext tube would help. The layers and lighting are superb. :cool: :smile:
Albert Darmo. Canada
Registered on November 25, 2008, 1386 Posts, 11978 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Yeoh on September 13, 2010 at 2:13 AM
Richard:
Sure works and worth keeping. Nice repeating line patterns arising from the yellow mist. :toast:
Registered on September 1, 2009, 588 Posts, 8184 Comments
Comment posted by Patricia Brundage on September 13, 2010 at 9:27 AM
Love the softness, the mood and the choice of POV. Great work! :toast:
Registered on March 23, 2006, 1111 Posts, 6531 Comments
Comment posted by May Haga on September 13, 2010 at 1:26 PM
The back lighting is what makes this image for me. Definitely a keeper.
May
Registered on February 22, 2007, 714 Posts, 8470 Comments
Comment posted by Jay Levin on February 8, 2011 at 5:14 PM
I think this is exquisite. Wonderful lighting and colors.
Registered on April 24, 2009, 21 Posts, 184 Comments