Flare Up
by Andrew Finlayson
Watched the high clouds drift overhead all day, waited for sunset. Chose centred composition to accentuate the feeling that the sky was exploding from one point.
Nikon D700
16-35mm @16mm
ISO 100 1/100
3 stop soft gnd
Processed in CS4, contrast, sharpening etc in RAW then a little TK luminosity and saturation masking. Didn't need a whole lot this one.
Comments
17 commentsedit: never mind that, got it.
You were very wide at 16mm, yet had to clip some of the sky drama. It's scenes like this that compelled me to get a Sigma 12-24. It is compatible with full frame sensors.
This is an ideal situation for a hard edge GND, but you used a soft edge. Did you have the option of using a 3-stop hard edge GND but chose the soft edge? If so, why?
I'd suggest trying to see if you could brighten the corners slightly using the vignette tool in lens correction.
Bottom line: Fabulous photograph.
Buck, I did consider the 12-24mm when getting the 16-35 recently but on some advice thought the 16-35 was a better lens. When some cash becomes availably I'll certainly have another look at the Sigma. As for the filters I've got a range of HiTechs on order but soft edge is all I've got at the moment.
I quite liked the vignetting but I agree perhaps its a bit too much. Thanks for looking and I appreciate the comments.
I didn't look into it too much as I was set on the Nikon anyway, but the 10-20mm is for crop and the 12-24mm is for full frame I think.
Congrats on the EP!
Sandy r
And thanks for taking the time to answer the questions from my first comment.
My first GND was a soft edge, and soon after I got some hard edge ones. I live in a flat coastal area and with the hard edge GNDs, I hardly use the soft edge. The Sigma 12-24 is the only lens that wide that is usable on a body with a FF sensor. It is a great adjunct to my 17-40mm. It is well built, reasonably priced (compare to the newly announced Canon 8-15mm fisheye) and optically pretty good - a little soft on the edges, but I think that is expectable.