Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Rain in the fjords
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Rain in the fjords

by Kurt Gaasoe

Gallery: LandscapePosted August 9, 2010297 views14 comments
When the weather is wet, its alot of times for good photography. In this case i had no umbrella so i just covered the lens with my hand. The grad filters used got a little wet on the edges, but i think i saved the picture. :)
I like the colors and the mood in the picture.

Comments

14 comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on August 9, 2010 at 7:43 AM
Definitely a great place. The comp feels well balanced and the moment you had there was very interesting. The clouds add a lot to the image here. A little issue for me is the little shoreline that separates the bottom rocks from the ones ahead. The eye need a needs a little force to get over it. You can try to lessen that effort by darkening the very bottom just a little.
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Plant on August 9, 2010 at 10:07 AM
very moody, great use of the rocks in the foreground to lead into the image, very nicely done!
Registered on July 7, 2008, 271 Posts, 1657 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on August 9, 2010 at 11:30 AM
Looks like a pretty magical place for sure, and you captured it well. I might crop just a little off the bottom but that's very minor.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Richins on August 9, 2010 at 11:56 AM
Very moody light you've captured here. Nice shot.
Registered on March 6, 2008, 113 Posts, 1009 Comments
Comment posted by Ben Horne on August 9, 2010 at 12:03 PM
The light here is fantastic. I like the atmospherics, along with the quality of light on the midground rocks. I don't think the vertical 2:3 aspet ratio is benefitting this shot though. The midground rocks are right in the middle, which gives me the feeling that the photo is being stretched apart. If you crop off the bottom of the shot, then use about a 4:5 aspect ratio for the top, the composition will again have harmony.
Registered on August 27, 2009, 51 Posts, 959 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on August 9, 2010 at 1:36 PM
Nice Kurt, I like the depth in this image. Also the fluffy white low clouds around the mountain are a great addition. I understand the comments made about the composition and feel that maybe a slightly higher vantage point would have brought the rocks lower in the frame and therewith created a bit stronger comp.
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by John Lehmkuhl on August 9, 2010 at 2:06 PM
Cool location, Kurt. I have to agree with Ben - the FG rocks are only a little on the attractive side. The money in this shot is the top 1/3 which maybe you captured as a separate shot ? I'd try to make them more the starts of the show instead of the rocks. Still worth getting wet for!
Registered on May 22, 2005, 165 Posts, 2008 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on August 9, 2010 at 10:28 PM
I think a square comp. Get rid of the lower foreground rocks because that view to the mountains mid-way up is powerful! Very well done!
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on August 9, 2010 at 11:15 PM
Oh gosh, this is good. So much to look at and enjoy. And what a magnificent place! Very well seen and captured.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on August 9, 2010 at 11:39 PM
Kurt,

I agree with you that the mood is quite nice, quiet, and the colors nice and very natural. While the composition in general is pretty well balanced, I would agree with some of the others that perhaps an alternate might be stronger. I think for me, you attempted to include so much and as someone put it, the comp seems stretched. Sometimes we fall prey to the notion that we have to have a compelling foreground in a wide angle landscape. Here, it's as it you have two of them; the immediate rock and water, and then the mid ground, which by itself could have served as a nice foreground. In the end, I'm torn between the wonderful sky and grand view vs. the texture and detail of the immediate foreground. Hope that makes sense.

The only other suggestion would be to bump up the contrast a bit at the base of the mountain between the lake's surface and the low hanging clouds, but that's minor.

I do with for a larger size though - you can post up to 720px in the long dimension.

thanks for posting!

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Vance Gese on August 10, 2010 at 12:59 AM
Incredible image Kurt. Love the mountains and the low lying clouds especially. Really nice.
Registered on November 13, 2008, 298 Posts, 6629 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on August 10, 2010 at 1:04 AM
Certainly a very eye-catching scene for it's rich colours and interesting landscape features. I can understand some of the reservations about the composition regarding foreground but it does work pretty well IMO.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Raymond Marlow on August 11, 2010 at 12:11 AM
great image with so much to look over, nice find
Registered on October 15, 2008, 158 Posts, 531 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Gaasoe on August 11, 2010 at 5:28 AM
Thank you all for your comments and opinions on my picture. I tried to make a crop as suggested and even darkened the forground a bit, but cant upload a new version. I have a horizontal version of the place as well, maybe that works better??
its been a lot of help from you guys! :)
Registered on August 5, 2009, 4 Posts, 7 Comments