Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Muskrat
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Muskrat

by Luke Ormand

Gallery: WildlifePosted March 29, 2010185 views6 comments
After photographing a pair of visiting Sandhill Cranes (Second sighting of this species since 1995, with the first sighting being earlier this year) I swung by one of my few "secret spots" where I've gotten quite close to pied-billed grebes here and to my surprise a muskrat was hanging out along the shoreline (only the 6th time I've seen one). It retreated to the water after awhile but I was able to walk out on a dock and get this shot which I'm really pleased with. A lower angle (laying down on the dock) WAS possible, but not in my time frame so I had to settle for kneeling and angling my body quite low.

This is just a one time reprieve from my seal photos which will continue later this week :biggrin:

D300s 300 f4 + 1.7X TC HH
f/7.1
1/800
ISO 800

Minor crop, sharpened the area in focus, no other adjustments.

Comments

6 comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on March 29, 2010 at 1:06 AM
These guys dive quickly every time I see them Luke, so I think this works great and certainly understand why you didn't have time to get lower. Besides, I really like the reflection in thi shot! I wish just a tiny bit more of him was in focus, but at 1/800 and all that hair any more DOF might have sacrificed sharpness.
Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on March 29, 2010 at 9:52 AM
Hi Luke,

I'm liking your seal images just fine, but this IS a nice interlude! :wink:

I like your diagonal use of the frame and the selective focus and thin depth of field do draw my eyes to the head region on the muskrat. You've already identified the single biggest factor that could have improved this image the most (shooting from lower angle) so no need to remind you of this. It's a shame the sky conditions didn't give you a more interesting and/or colourful water surface to work with, but there was obviously nothing you could do about this. I think in a perfect world I would like to see a little more DOF here, especially given how much of the animal is in view (and I think the diagonal orientation and strong line of the body would have led the viewer's eye to the right place even if more of the subject was in focus). I'm guessing that the thin DOF was mainly driven by technical issues, primarily keeping your shutter speed high enough to HH that lens and TC combo...

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on March 29, 2010 at 3:03 PM
He looks better large. I like his attitude and the reflection elevates this a level!
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by SandyRichardsBrown on March 29, 2010 at 6:59 PM
Luke, this is really cool. These guys are always too quick for me.
Maybe I'm screwy, but this seems to need a bit of cw rotaiton..? Seems the eys are off-level, which to me is the test.

Sandy r
Registered on November 24, 2003, 3937 Posts, 12909 Comments
Comment posted by Greg Cope on March 29, 2010 at 9:55 PM
Pretty cool. I like the the lack of large ripples in the water and the low pose the Muskrat has.
Registered on January 22, 2007, 212 Posts, 2737 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on March 30, 2010 at 1:55 PM
This is a very pleasing rat image Luke (never thought I would say that! :biggrin: ). The diagonal combined with the simplicity (i.e. no distracting elements whatsoever) makes it eastheticaly appealing. The reflection certainly also helps with that and in that respect your shooting angle is just fine. A lower angle would have yielded a potentially great image too, but a compeltely different image. :toast:
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments