Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Hairy Woodpecker
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Hairy Woodpecker

by Hilke Breder

Gallery: AvianPosted March 21, 201072 views5 comments
This woodpecker was lurking between two trees remaining motionless for minutes watching the feeder on a nearby tree. I was struck by the juxtaposition of the strong facial markings and the patterns on the trees.

Nikon D300, Sigma 150-500mm f/5.0-6.3
1/125 sec at f/8.0
500 mm, ISO 200

Comments

5 comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on March 21, 2010 at 6:22 PM
I like the graphics of this and the very interesting textures. But you didn't have enough depth of field for this to work: only the nearer tree trunk is in focus. A higher ISO setting would have allowed the lens to be stoped down for more DOF, and the point of focus should hve been on the woodpecker.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Dudley on March 21, 2010 at 7:14 PM
Hilke, I like the vertical orientation of all three major elements - bird and two trunks and the contrasting textures of the two trees is appealing. But I agree that there's a DOF/softness issue here.
Registered on March 30, 2007, 437 Posts, 10915 Comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on March 21, 2010 at 7:39 PM
Hilke,

Ron D. and Rich D. have already addressed the issues I see in this image. I like the bird among the tree trunks, the different patterns and the soft greens in the background.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on March 21, 2010 at 10:26 PM
I think I would crop just a little bit from the left and the right to remove the green bg there Hilke. Is this cropped a lot? I'm seeing a fair amount of loss of detail in the bird and I'm not sure if it's a focus/dof or cropping issue. If it's cropped quite a bit and you have more room on top and bottom I would include more room there. :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Hilke Breder on March 23, 2010 at 11:46 AM
Thanks for all your comments. It's cropped to about 1/6th of the entire area. I sharpened it as much as I could without causing artifact. I usually set my ISO at 400 to 800; the setting of 200 was left over from a previous shoot. I should go through a checklist before each session :-)
Registered on February 9, 2010, 10 Posts, 11 Comments