Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Red Sky at Night ...
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Red Sky at Night ...

by Margo Pinkerton

Gallery: LandscapePosted March 21, 2010168 views11 comments
The same night I saw Impending Storm (Man & Nature), I looked the other way and saw the most amazing sky. Racing to the other side of the island, I did the usual sky shot, then saw this amazing play of the red reflections on the water.

Comments

11 comments
Comment posted by Barry Vangrov on March 21, 2010 at 1:51 PM
Beautiful light on the water. I'd suggest a 4x5 crop of the top 1/3 that's out of focus. :smile:
Registered on September 1, 2009, 148 Posts, 749 Comments
Comment posted by Margo Pinkerton on March 21, 2010 at 2:16 PM
Thanks for your input, Barry. I tried cropping it, but didn't like it at all. It lost the effect I wanted of using selective focus to allow the image to trail off. I wanted to keep your eye in the fore- and middle-ground.

That said, I know there are plenty of people who prefer everything in focus in a photograph.
Registered on October 18, 2007, 39 Posts, 214 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on March 21, 2010 at 7:01 PM
Focus aint the problem, brightness is! Must see brighter, at least the bright portions (if youve never played with luminosity masks--nowz the time!). The red blue contrast will be killer (once i can see them better). Id also lose the nasty chalkboard surrounding bg, black would probably work just fine. :wink:
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Reed Bowman on March 21, 2010 at 8:47 PM
I think the impact of this image is in the contrast between dark blue and read and the patterns they form in the water. I don't need every image to be tack sharp, but not sure what purpose the oof foreground and bg serves. I like a hortizontal crop of just the middle, with a bit of lightening...there are amazing patterns and colors here...well seen
Registered on March 2, 2009, 166 Posts, 1058 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on March 21, 2010 at 9:22 PM
That's neat. Good eye for the unusual. But you shouldn't've told us what's going on. This is a cool abstract that's fine just to enjoy as is.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Youssef Ismail on March 21, 2010 at 10:55 PM
Margo,

A fascinating abstract. I do wish it had more DOF. The OOF portions distract.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 474 Posts, 5555 Comments
Comment posted by Hamed Musharbak on March 22, 2010 at 1:54 AM
great touch of light here

a little bit dark

Hamed
Registered on June 1, 2009, 372 Posts, 2282 Comments
Comment posted by Stuart Williams on March 22, 2010 at 4:53 AM
subtle shapes emerge from this; i'd be inclined to crop to square.
Registered on December 7, 2007, 247 Posts, 4792 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on March 22, 2010 at 2:17 PM
Margo,

I really like the patterns and abstract nature of the rippling water surface. The color contrast is the great eye-catcher too. I can understand you're thinking about the selective focus and I think this does work to keep the eye in the sharper area. But IMHO, selective focus/shallow dof is tough when using with a continuous pattern. In other words, the eye wants to follow and explore the continued/repeated patterns, but then when they become out of focus, it mentally seems like a DOF issue rather than a separating technique - if that makes sense.

Regardless, a very nice natural abstract. I would agree with a slightly brighter presentation, but that's minor.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Mary Dennis on March 22, 2010 at 6:45 PM
This is pretty darn cool Margo. I think I would really like to see against a white background.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 290 Posts, 2897 Comments
Comment posted by Margo Pinkerton on March 23, 2010 at 8:17 AM
Thank you all for your comments. It was at the end of the day, when the water was nearly black. And on my regularly-calibrated screen at home, it is brighter than it appears once you upload it to these galleries. Certainly something to keep in mind for next time. I wish there were a way to update a photo. Ah well! Because there is lot of luminocity in the photo at home.
Registered on October 18, 2007, 39 Posts, 214 Comments