Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
A Story in Edges
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

A Story in Edges

by Tony Kuyper

Gallery: LandscapePosted March 5, 2010576 views49 comments
As if sandstone isn't already abstract enough, this is an attempt to let it go a bit further. I took the image so it all makes sense to me, but I'm not sure it'll be clear to others. I've not shown this to anyone yet, but feel the edges hold the clues. Can you figure out what this is? (Larger version included for better edge-checking.) Does this work as an image or is it too indecipherable?

Minimal processing on this, so your thoughts and suggestions would be appreciated.

5D, 28-200.

(Note: Vance Gese and Dietrich Gloger basically have comp figured out below.)

Comments

49 comments
Comment posted by Youssef Ismail on March 5, 2010 at 11:26 PM
Tony,

I am not sure. It looks like you are in some type of a slot canyon with some very interesting reflected light bouncing off something to light the closest rock face. I love the hint of back light at the ver top of the center dak wall. It is very abstract with a sens of flatness and depth at the same time. Very elusive.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 474 Posts, 5555 Comments
Comment posted by Vance Gese on March 6, 2010 at 12:01 AM
At the risk of always seeming to be sort of gushing over your imagery Tony, this is absolutely beyond belief. Phenomenal abstract by a master of the art. The textures, the lines, the light are beyond superb.
After a bit of study, I believe that I am looking at three sandstone faces; that on the right is nearest, the darker one is mid-ground, and the farthest stone face being on the left hand side of the image. I imagine reflected light is illuminating the faces on the left and right; the left hand sandstone face being lit by light reflected off the back of the dark mid-ground face, the slight edgelight suggesting this. Could be all wrong though. Amazing how the lines and light confound the mind as to who's on first. This uncertainty adds to the amazing beauty. Incredible work as always.
Registered on November 13, 2008, 298 Posts, 6629 Comments
Comment posted by Aaron Ellingsen on March 6, 2010 at 12:11 AM
Ah, man. I love an image that commands you to study it and take a closer look in order to get a grasp on what is happening. Absolutely brilliant in that department. I like the very subtle striations and the natural feel of the processing as well. This is one of the best images I've seen in a while, and one I'd gladly put on my wall.
Registered on January 16, 2008, 56 Posts, 953 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Pelzmann on March 6, 2010 at 12:51 AM
Tony, I like this slot canyon abstraction a lot. The small version really plays tricks on my eyes. The larger version less so. However, the tones look rather strange, especailly the transitions to what were probably darker shadows. It looks like the results I get with too much shadow/highlight recovery? :confused:
Registered on January 26, 2005, 27 Posts, 265 Comments
Comment posted by Bret Edge on March 6, 2010 at 1:02 AM
I think I understand what's going on here but really, I don't care whether I "get it" or not. I love the image and find it to be a beautiful abstract w/ stunning light, color and tones.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 711 Posts, 6363 Comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on March 6, 2010 at 4:06 AM
Great shot, Tony. I actually like the little "puzzle" included in here. Makes you look closer and enjoy all the beauty in here even more.
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Hamed Musharbak on March 6, 2010 at 5:49 AM
WoW !! this is killer :eek:

what a great find

im always enjoying your fine art works

very beautiful Tony

wish you all the best man

Hamed
Registered on June 1, 2009, 372 Posts, 2282 Comments
Comment posted by Dietrich Gloger on March 6, 2010 at 6:35 AM
Have not looked at other's people guesses. Of course a slot canyon. The nearest wall is on the right, partly covering the one in the center and then the one on the left is the one furthest away. This one seems to be lit from behind the center element.

Works great for me Tony. Fascinating how this gets my mind working.
Registered on January 26, 2007, 360 Posts, 9876 Comments
Comment posted by Rajeev Thomas on March 6, 2010 at 6:56 AM
I am totally confused by looking at it :biggrin: But what an excellent image.... !!! :toast: :toast: I think this is your best Tony.... holy smokes....
Registered on February 20, 2008, 0 Posts, 291 Comments
Comment posted by Mary Dennis on March 6, 2010 at 7:18 AM
Hi Tony,

I'm with Bret on this. I don't care if I "get" what's going on here. Don't need to at all actually. It has great visual impact and a wonderful rhythm running vertically as well as horizontally. Interesting about the minimal processing for such a powerful image.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 290 Posts, 2897 Comments
Comment posted by Angela McCain on March 6, 2010 at 8:21 AM
Very interesting. Lovely range of tones and light.
Registered on April 19, 2009, 367 Posts, 3589 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Tal on March 6, 2010 at 8:29 AM
I love it, Tony. Can't tell what's in front or behind what. This really plays tricks on your mind and makes it fascinating to study.

Guy
Registered on November 1, 2003, 566 Posts, 15507 Comments
Comment posted by Larry Fischer on March 6, 2010 at 8:48 AM
Yup, it's an abstract and I like it.
The alternating shades and vertical lines, along with very subtle horizontal lines, make the photo.
the fisch
Registered on July 28, 2008, 155 Posts, 874 Comments
Comment posted by Abdullaziz Bin Ali on March 6, 2010 at 9:00 AM
Wow Tony, This is 3D work :)
I love this work
the light here is wonderful, I always enjoy your work Tony
Registered on May 31, 2009, 112 Posts, 1590 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on March 6, 2010 at 9:00 AM
What a wonderful study of light, shapes, and texture! Almost three dimensional in it's depth. Super eye Tony.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Dayton on March 6, 2010 at 9:03 AM
A fine art abstract, Tony. Beyond that I don't know what it is nor do I care.
Registered on November 11, 2008, 281 Posts, 3958 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on March 6, 2010 at 9:39 AM
What Guy said. This is excellent, but my eyes are having a great time being baffled. What seems to be in front and back is continually shifting on me. I think I have it, then what seemed like the background becomes the foreground again. Very cool!! :toast:
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments
Comment posted by Jimmy Gekas on March 6, 2010 at 9:47 AM
This is really tricky and I like it! Great glow regardless and I think it glows more when you have to stare at it to figure out what is going on. Good stuff. :toast:
Registered on July 26, 2007, 244 Posts, 2807 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Baumbach on March 6, 2010 at 10:05 AM
I'm with the others here. I don't care to make sense of the image. I just like it.

- Dan.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 473 Posts, 7980 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on March 6, 2010 at 11:07 AM
This is great to look at, and very interesting. On my monitor I see a little white on the rock edge of the shadow area left of center and not sure what that is. Guess I can't really figure it out, but I sure like the image. The detail in the sandstone is amazing to me. Great work.
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Bob&Charly Nelson on March 6, 2010 at 11:19 AM
Wonderful Tony, the shadows, lines and colours are great. Super capture and presentation :toast:
Bob :wavey:
Registered on October 27, 2005, 289 Posts, 4202 Comments
Comment posted by Greg Cope on March 6, 2010 at 12:02 PM
Outstanding stuff Tony. Absolutely love the layers play tricks on my mind, how they add so much dimension
Registered on January 22, 2007, 212 Posts, 2737 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel Ewert on March 6, 2010 at 12:05 PM
Great work, Tony. I have a guess as to what is going on in this puzzle, but I can't be sure. Excellent work!
Registered on June 2, 2009, 103 Posts, 1500 Comments
Comment posted by Rudy Ruberti on March 6, 2010 at 12:51 PM
I really like how the three rock faces appear to jump around in the scene. Great image and illusion, Tony. Judging from the bright edge on the center rock, I would guess that it's being hit by direct light from behind.
Registered on October 28, 2008, 179 Posts, 1875 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on March 6, 2010 at 12:54 PM
This makes my brain hurt! :biggrin: What an incredible, complex, beautiful image. There is also a very sensuous line in the middle that looks like a profile of a woman's body.
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by R.Bill Moser on March 6, 2010 at 1:40 PM
First of all i like this image even though I don't really know what this is. I think that you are in a slot canyon and this are the canyon walls and its reflected light and shadows. It is very abstract but it does work for me. I love the lines and textures here and the color.
Registered on January 29, 2010, 285 Posts, 4281 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on March 6, 2010 at 2:06 PM
I do like it but at the same time find it a tad "indecipherable." Almost an optical illusion. I think it confuses the brain. In that respect, very unique and very cool!
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by John&Patty Benway on March 6, 2010 at 2:16 PM
I hope you tell everyone what we are seeing, I have been looking at this for a long time and it is starting to make me crazy. the center column of sand stone is real, not a shadow, and I believe your light source is coming in from behind it, giving it the illusion of being a shadow, anyway, beautiful work as always Tony.
Registered on May 12, 2006, 626 Posts, 8700 Comments
Comment posted by Justin Reznick on March 6, 2010 at 3:58 PM
Beautiful image Tony, the light is fantastic! I thought I understood it just fine, but looking harder I now see it in a different a way. That's too cool Tony. Well done!
Registered on November 24, 2009, 79 Posts, 515 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel Rappaport on March 6, 2010 at 6:51 PM
Indecipherable to me beyond orange sandstone, light and dark, but as an abstract it works beautifully.
Registered on September 9, 2009, 294 Posts, 2006 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on March 6, 2010 at 7:06 PM
This is absolutly fascinating, Tony. The combination of light and shadow is very engaging and keeps the viewer looking. I have looked at this a couple of times and I have seen a face, a woman's profile and a derriere so far. This rocks!

Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by Margo Pinkerton on March 6, 2010 at 7:43 PM
The whole idea of an abstract is that is not need to be decipherable. Don't do that to yourself. What you have done is a beautiful, dynamic abstract. Do I guess what it is? Yes. Do I really care what it is? No. That is the mark of a successful abstract. We are more taken by the design than the source. Well done!
Registered on October 18, 2007, 39 Posts, 214 Comments
Comment posted by Bruno Silva on March 6, 2010 at 10:50 PM
I took a few minutes staring at the large version, impressive. My eyes were glued, very misterious and painterly. Beautiful work. One must take some time to apreciate the beauty of this piece of work, or shall I say, piece of art. fabulous, tony.
Registered on May 6, 2009, 132 Posts, 1406 Comments
Comment posted by Eva McDermott on March 6, 2010 at 11:22 PM
I think it is two sandstone faces. The two darker stripes are part of the light kissed one on the right. The light and color looks magnificent Tony. Only very minor nit is the little bit of white on the edge of the left face. Really did not notice it until I looked a the larger version. Splendid work once again.
Registered on January 4, 2009, 1015 Posts, 13229 Comments
Comment posted by Adrian Klein on March 6, 2010 at 11:58 PM
I can't remember anything else that has played with my eyes more than this in recent memory. Wow, this is very cool regardless if I can figure out what is front or back. Another top notch TK sandstone image!
Registered on June 10, 2007, 112 Posts, 1506 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Lundh on March 7, 2010 at 12:21 AM
What a wierd effect... I love how it plays with the mind. It's pretty difficult to discern which is the fg element and which is the bg... Either way, what an amazing abstract with wonderful light! :toast:
Registered on April 28, 2004, 774 Posts, 4351 Comments
Comment posted by Kevin Trinkner on March 7, 2010 at 7:58 AM
Wonderful abstract shot Tony, incredible light and color. My guess is this is a slot canyon, but either way I really enjoy this shot. Great work.
Registered on June 30, 2008, 203 Posts, 2641 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on March 7, 2010 at 12:33 PM
Fascinating mind game Tony. I really like the slightly more subtle/natural color/contrast you used on this one too, looks real nice :smile:
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Scott Smorra on March 7, 2010 at 12:52 PM
This is an amazing abstract image Tony. It really plays tricks on my eyes/mind, which makes it very enjoyable to view. Well done.
Registered on November 2, 2009, 161 Posts, 2143 Comments
Comment posted by Julian Barkway on March 7, 2010 at 1:55 PM
What everyone else has said. :wink:

Excellent, Tony.
Registered on January 18, 2007, 344 Posts, 1961 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Capurso on March 7, 2010 at 8:37 PM
A beautiful study in light, texture and contrast. This is destined to be a classic, Tony.

Mark Capurso
Phoenix, AZ
Registered on January 4, 2008, 47 Posts, 321 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Capurso on March 7, 2010 at 8:39 PM
A beautiful study in light, texture and contrast. This is destined to be a classic, Tony.

Mark Capurso
Phoenix, AZ
Registered on January 4, 2008, 47 Posts, 321 Comments
Comment posted by Anil Rao on March 8, 2010 at 12:47 AM
Very very interesting. And, really abstract. I have been studying it for a while (specially the larger version) and its taxing but enjoyable to try and figure it out. I think the way you have it now is perfect - the contrast is excellent and that is perhaps what is keeping us from easily deciphering the image.
Registered on November 15, 2003, 234 Posts, 4923 Comments
Comment posted by Giovanni Allievi on March 8, 2010 at 2:05 AM
Nice job Tony.

At first I was a bit disoriented, but I second Vance and Dietrich guesses.

Giovanni.
Registered on March 26, 2008, 87 Posts, 379 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Richins on March 8, 2010 at 10:09 AM
Wonderful light and glow in this image. But, it's difficult to tell what's in the front or back, and this works for me.
Registered on March 6, 2008, 113 Posts, 1009 Comments
Comment posted by Chip Phillips on March 8, 2010 at 1:54 PM
This is great Tony. I don't recall ever seeing an image that messed with my eyes and brain so much.
I think there is something about the edges that really amplifies this, don't quite know what it is though.
Registered on November 26, 2007, 128 Posts, 1436 Comments
Comment posted by Phil Pogledich on March 8, 2010 at 2:42 PM
I believe it can be figured out without that much difficulty (the walls recede from right to left across the frame). If you tell us otherwise, I'll be a bit surprised. Regardless I enjoy it tremendously. I'm not quite willing to agree with those who say it doesn't matter if you can figure it out . . . I like to be able to get my mind around what I'm looking at even if it is an abstract.

Oops, just read your "note" about the comp. Looks like my instincts were right.
Registered on August 24, 2009, 123 Posts, 3099 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on March 10, 2010 at 7:33 PM
Coming back to it at first glance before my mind plays tricks on me I see foreground on the right, midground in the middle then background on the left. Right? Wrong? :confused:

Then the mind flips it in reverse. :confused: :biggrin:
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Zack Schnepf on March 25, 2010 at 9:02 PM
Wow! This image is wild, this is one of those abstract images that really confounds the senses. I love the relationship with the positive and negative space. Wonderful image Tony.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 403 Posts, 2528 Comments